Robert Jordan, along with 500 others, took a written test for consideration to be a police officer in one of several cities and towns in southeastern Connecticut on March 16, 1996 (Jordan v. City of New London, 1999). The test was administered by “LEC” which is the Law Enforcement Council of Southeastern Connecticut, Inc. (Jordan v. City of New London, 1999). For the participating police departments, this test was used as an initial screener for likely candidates (Jordan v. City of New London, 1999). This written test utilized the Wonderlic Personnel Test and Scholastic Level Exam (WPT), which claim to gage cognitive aptitude (Jordan v. City of New London, 1999). This test actually came with a handbook that showcased recommended scores for particular jobs such a police officer and warned that higher scores needed for a job could prevent that opportunity (Jordan v. City of New London, 1999). The reasoning behind this was that over qualified folks usually leave their job soon after the agency has spent a significant amount of time and money into the applicant (Jordan v. City of New London, 1999). The score recommended for police officers was 21, and candidates selected had score ranges from 20-27 (Jordan v. City of New London, 1999). Robert Jordan scored a 33 (Jordan v. City of New London, 1999). …show more content…
City of New London, 1999). Robert initially thought he was being discriminated against for his age, as he was 46 (Jordan v. City of New London, 1999). After making a formal complaint, he was informed by the city that he was not being selected for interview because his WPT score was too high at 33 and the criteria for the city was to only interview those who scored between 20-27 on the WPT (Jordan v. City of New London,
Kelo v. City of New London was a case that peaked my interest. To me, this is a classic case of government overreach. Let us start from the beginning. In 1997 Susette Kelo purchased a home in the historic neighborhood of Fort Trumbull in New London, Connecticut. She had always dreamed of owning a home on the water and painstakingly restored it to it 's former glory.
The case prosecuted under the court of Appeal of Ontario, Her Majesty the Queen v Danny Lalumiere, in 2011, was intended to appeal the conviction of counseling to commit murder. The appellant argued that the life sentence was not appropriate and was outside the range of sentences imposed on similar offenders for similar offenses. This is an example of a case where legal guilt was used to provide a conviction. The conviction of the appellant was based on the testimony of a psychiatrist doctor, Dr. Pallandi, who provided a profile of the accused and concluded that the appellant was pathologically predisposed to commit an offense. The appellate court ruled against the Crown’s decision at the trial, stating that the appellant lacked moral culpability for his offenses and therefore the sentence was not deserved.
New Jersey v. T.L.O. is a Supreme Court case that made its way through the three levels of courts in 1985. The entire dilemma began one day when two girls were caught smoking in a school bathroom by a teacher. The teacher immediately took the two to the vice principal’s office, where they were questioned. One of the girls admitted to smoking, but the other, the girl known as T.L.O., denied it. The principal, Theodore Choplick, seized T.L.O.’s purse and began to rummage through it.
Should The SAT Determine Your Future Throughout the years there have been many questions regarding the reliability of the SAT. Should an aptitude test be such a large factor in college acceptance. I firmly believe The SAT should not be a factor in college admissions because it has proven to be biased , unreliable, and overall unjust. The Scholastic Aptitude test, or SAT is no stranger to high school students across America. The test is divided into two sections of math and verbal language skills, a total of 138 questions with a point scale ranging from 200-800.
In the article, “Blue Collar Brilliance”, published in the summer of 2009 by Mike Rose in the American Scholar, Rose persuades people that the amount of someone’s educational level doesn’t justify their intelligence level and we shouldn’t base our opinions of their intelligence purely off their jobs. Since this article was published in the American Scholar his target audience is people of higher education and those who might hold stereotypes of blue collar workers. Rose is highly successful in persuading his audience to form new opinions on blue collar workers and their overall intelligence levels. He emphasizes his credibility throughout the article with anecdotes, a well thought out organization of his paper, as well as an elevated vocabulary
Daryl Cagle: High School Standardized Testing In Daryl Cagle’s cartoon depicting a job interviewer asking a recently graduated high school student, “So, how has high school prepared you for this job?”, he wants readers to ponder if high school students are really prepared to take on the responsibilities of a job straight out of high school. The student’s response was that he could only think of the answer choices from the testing that he was given throughout his high school career. This leaves the reader acknowledged that the student is not prepared for the job and has not learned anything relating to the job that he is getting interviewed for. According to the Cagle’s comic, high school standardized testing doesn’t teach real life skills
Seika McKee Dickens ENGL 1113 1 OCT. 2015 The Hidden Education in the Poor Perhaps one of the most valuable opportunities in life is education. In a conversation between Adam Howard, associate professor of education at Antioch College, and Arthur Levine, president of Teachers College at Columbia University, in “Where Are The Poor Students,” some subjects at hand are the availability or unavailability of opportunities, the missed value of education, and the irrelevant comparison of test scores directed towards the poor students.
Issue: Kent was unaware of his case's transfer of jurisdiction from the juvenile court of D.C. to the state's regular district court. Was the juvenile court's waiver of jurisdiction valid? Would the individual transferred to the adult court still have rights that were applicable in juvenile court? Did the juvenile court conduct a full investigation for Kent? Important information might have been revealed had an investigation been performed.
In American society, the quality of public education is a vital topic for debate. While critics allege that the politicization of public education in underachieving communities has led to ineffective policies and reforms, proponents allege that public education still acts as an entrance to greater opportunities for students of all backgrounds. These two assertions have created a dichotomy amongst educators, policymakers, politicians, and parents. Thus, a reactionary perspective of educational reform has been proposed in response to advocates of public education.
Another thing that places students of color at a disadvantage in college admissions is the persisting cultural bias in high-stakes testing. “High-stakes” tests are those that are tied to major consequences, such as admission to college, or even high school graduation. Fair education reform advocates have long been citing an extensive record of standardized testing concerns, many of which relate to racial bias and discrimination. As researcher and author Harold Berlak explains in the journal Rethinking Education: Standardized testing perpetuates institutionalized racism and contributes to the achievement gap between whites and minorities. For instance, the deeply embedded stereotype that African Americans perform poorly on standardized tests
Either way, law enforcement officers are demanded to put themselves at risk to keep the general population safe. However, this does not keep this career from having its flaws, specifically the threat of death and/or injury, increased rates of depression or suicidal tendencies, and the mental strain of required duties. Methods Castaneda, L. W., & Ridgeway, G. (2010). Perceived Pros and Cons of Law Enforcement Careers. In Today’s Police and Sheriff Recruits: Insights from the Newest Members of America’s Law Enforcement Community (pp. 15–40).
Title: Mendez v. Westminster (1946) Abstract: The Mendez v. Westminster (1946) was the stepping stone to ending school segregation in California. The lawsuit was led by Gonzalo Mendez and five other parents who were denied enrollment of their children in an Anglo school. This led them to protest and then file a class-action lawsuit against the Westminster School District of Orange County California. Accusing them of segregating Mexican and Latin decent students.
Over recent years, the debate of whether or not to continue using standardized testing to evaluate college applicants has been somewhat controversial. Although college may not necessarily ensure success in the future, is not the only path in which success can be found, and is not a good path for every student, a majority of students that graduate high school want to go to college and need to know what it is they need to accomplish before their four years are up. Some of the colleges shifting to the idea of accepting applicants not based on test scores think that the potential to do well in college shouldn’t be based on these things. These argue that personal traits and characteristics are what determine success. Traits like these aren’t truly measurable though.
Whether The Mainstream Education and Standardized Tests measure Creative Skills or not The expression “alternative education” portrays distinctive ways to deal with teaching and learning other than state-provided mainstream education, by providing usual inventive educational modules and a flexible program of study which is construct to a substantial degree in light of the individual understudy 's interests and needs (Raywid, 1988; Koetzsch, 1997; Carnie, 2003). Alternative models of instruction have got along with the government education system ever since its initiation in the first half of the nineteenth century (Raywid, 1999). Otherwise, the endeavors made by the state to provide a typical, socially unifying education for all children have
Psychometric test is used to identify the mental characteristic of people and put a measurement against such characteristic (Roberts, 2005). Most of the psychometric tests are professionally designed by occupational psychologists with detailed manuals providing the data to establish the reliability of the test and how test scores might be judged. They are scored in a standardized manner so that employers can compare their test candidates against the scores of relevant populations (CIPD, 2015). The inbuilt measure and checks can identify whether the candidates are dishonest. Therefore it is a more objective and free from bias way of assessing candidates.