This is what is known as holism, or the interconnection of all the various parts of culture. This is the integration characteristic of culture. Dynamism is important to a culture. This means
While culture does provide a uniqueness to groups and regions, all cultures do have similarities. Most countries, groups, and religions generally have one set culture, some may consist of many subcultures. While a country’s culture has deep roots in heritage, external factors may influence its growth and change; such as people, geography,
According to Howard S. Becker, American Sociologist, culture is defined as the shared ways of a human social group that includes the ways of thinking, understanding, and feeling that have been gained through common experience and passed from generation to generation. Thus cultural understanding expects its people to have same beliefs, and brings people to act under cultural norms. However, when a person in a community has different beliefs than them, then culture oppresses that person’s life in order to make he/she live under cultural expectation or eliminate that person from its culture in the name of deviant. Culture can be a community with encouragement, comfort and peace but it also can be a cold isolated place for people with different beliefs. In both stories, “No Name Woman” and Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza, describe isolated life of women under cultural oppression who deviated from
Eventually cultures are created through communication. Culture and communication have been characterized and re-characterized over and over, as these are the ideas that are personally connected with what is inherently human. In reality, from an anthropological perspective, culture got to be merged with every last bit of its variables at the point when man initially seemed and made interpersonal associations with the diverse people framing separate groups, subsequently considering intercultural communication. Dialect has dependably been considered, from the time of the Tower of Babel, as one of the impediments to intercultural correspondence, however in our universe of globalization also information transfers, this thought may be tested by the spread of
However, it is not a closed off system, it draws statements from and into other discourses. A discourse in this understanding is not based on the classical distinction between thought and action, it “(…) is about the production of knowledge through language. But it is itself produced by a practice: “discursive practice” – the practice of producing meaning” (Hall, 2006:165). It follows that because all social practices involve meaning, all practices necessarily have a discursive side. A discourse is comparable to what sociologists would call an ‘ideology’.
Collectively peoples social, historical, and cultural knowledge shapes who they are. He does this by highlighting to acquire knowledge it’s misleading to assume it’s based merely on memorizing facts and truths. Kincheloe continues to claim that “critical constructivist” attempt to
In the first position he defines identity as one shared culture and similarities amongst a group of people and the second position includes both similarities and differences amongst a group of people/immigrants, and moreover in this position identity is a matter of being and becoming (223). In this first position Hall focuses on similarities between people of a group. It emphasizes on one essential thing “oneness” the most basic of people (112). It is defined as “one shared culture”, collective and as one self which is true (225). Here self is hidden under many layers, it is hidden under many artificial ‘selves’.
This essay discusses the definition of culture, cultural encounters, and the representation of this issue in the story. Culture is defined by characteristics that are shared by a group of people. It is usually represented by language, religion, cuisine, traditional clothes, music, arts, and is dependent on social habits. Therefore, culture plays a major role in an individual’s perspective of life and his/her personality. Cultures have differed than each other, depending on the places they were established in, the way of survival people pursued to acclimate with different circumstances, and how they shared their experiences with each other.
There are many standards defining and measuring a culture, some of these are obvious from one culture to another and others need some analysis before recognizing them. Two of these traits are collectivism and individualism, which differ greatly from country to country and culture to culture. In addition to defining those, the possibility of coexistence of the two traits will be examined. First, collectivism simply defined is the idea of everyone being a part of a larger group and all behavior stemming from this. More specifically, collectivism includes looking at the needs of those in your group before looking at your own, readiness to cooperate with your group, shared beliefs, and happiness based on the welfare of those around you.
In my perspective, culture may be regarded as a curse or a blessing, there is beauty amidst diversity. Culture is defined as shared beliefs, values, and practices (REF). Therefore, People have to embrace the diversity that culture brings in order to find its inner strength in treasuring the core values of humanity. In understanding culture, we have to dwell deeper on the material and non-material aspects of it.
Firstly, Johnson disagrees with the individualistic explanation of society as simply a collection of people. Instead, he claims that every individual is always a part of “something larger” and the best way to understand social life is to determine what we participate in and how we participate in it (Johnson 2008: 9,13). He suggests that a collection of people makes up a system, whether they know it or not, and this system in turn lays out “paths of least resistance that shape how people participate.” Also, Johnson claims that systems and individuals are dependent on one another but are separate entities (Johnson 2008: 19). Thus, the sociological imagination for Johnson involves understanding our membership and the way we participate in systems such as race, class, and gender. More importantly, we must understand society not simply as a collection of systems or as a collection of people as individuals, but as both of them concurrently (Johnson 2008: