ipl-logo

Judicial Branch Essay

631 Words3 Pages

When the constitution was created the framers made the judicial branch in order to help keep the laws in place. The judicial branch was created to interpret the constitution and inforce the laws amongst the people. When the framers created the judicial branch they never knew what impact it would have on the country it does today. “While they understood and prioritized the value of an independent judiciary in a common law system, they could not have predicted the critical role the courts would play in the interpretation of the Constitution, our understanding of the law, the development of public policy, and the preservation and expansion of individual rights and liberties over time” (515). The judicial system is a good split of power between …show more content…

There is federal, state, and supreme. “The U.S. judicial system features a dual court model, with courts at both the federal and state levels, and the U.S. Supreme Court at the top” (515). Federal court cases are more low profiles, while state court is usually a higher profile case. “While cases may sometimes be eligible for both state and federal review, each level has its own distinct jurisdiction. There are trial and appellate courts at both levels, but there are also remarkable differences among the states in their laws, politics, and culture, meaning that no two state court systems are exactly alike” (515). Each state is different when it comes to laws, regulations, and their due processing system. The judicial system has evolved over the years, and is not the structure as the framers created. “The system’s reliance on precedent ensures a consistent and stable institution that is still capable of slowly evolving over the years—such as by increasingly reflecting the diverse population it serves” (515). The framers created the concept, but the structure needed to evolve over the years. The framers could not have imagined the impact the judicial system would have on today’s

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of The Return Of Martin Guerre By Natalie Zemon Davis

    1354 Words  | 6 Pages

    Although the judicial system was different in several ways, it outlined how we prosecute and defend people in modern court

    Read More

  • Essay On Checks And Balances Guard Against Tyranny

    800 Words  | 4 Pages

    In addition, James Madison stated the idea of Checks and Balances and what it will do to the government, “...the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other... The three branches should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” This statement means that each branch should have a different power, so they wouldn’t have any constitutional control over each other. That makes each branch check on the other branches to make sure they are doing everything correctly. One way that the Judicial Branch can check on the Legislative Branch is that when Congress creates laws, the Court can declare laws unconstitutional because some laws might not be a good idea for the people of the country, so the Judicial has the power to take away the possible law.

    Read More

  • Federalist Papers 78 And 79: The Judiciary Branch

    804 Words  | 4 Pages

    That if they had more power than just a simple court they could uphold the values of the country. Yes, there was the threat of abusing power, but it would be highly unlikely given the strict requirements to become a judge should deter anybody with bad intentions from becoming one. The idea was simply that why would someone trying to undermine the government go through the years of education necessary to gain the position. And if they ever did succeed then congress could simply remove them by will of the

    Read More

  • Texas Judicial Branch Case Study

    856 Words  | 4 Pages

    However, the Texas Judicial Branch operates efficiently now despite some minor issues that critics perceive as inadequate for the 21st century. Perhaps in the future, some areas of our judicial system could be streamlined to better meet the needs of our society as we grow our ever more diverse society here in the state of Texas. Until

    Read More

  • Constitutional Dbq Essay

    1227 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Constitution is frequently thought to be the preeminent law of the United States that all laws made after it ought to maintain. Hamilton expressed that "the Constitution should be the standard of development for the laws, and that wherever there is an obvious restriction, the laws should offer place to the Constitution" (Document E). In any case, there have been times in United States history where a law has been passed that collides with the Constitution. On the off chance that the Constitution truly is the preeminent law of the United States, than any unlawful law that is passed ought to be toppled. In the event that the Supreme Court did not have the force of legal audit, than the privileges of the Constitution would gradually be taken away by new laws that contention with the Constitution.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Texas And Federal Court System

    458 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Texas and federal court systems are integral components of the American legal system, but they share both similarities and differences that distinguish them from one another. In this essay, I will discuss two similarities and two differences between these two court systems, examining their structures, method of selection, and types of cases heard. Firstly, the hierarchical structure is a fundamental similarity shared by both the Texas and federal court systems. Both systems employ a similar hierarchical structure that commences with trial courts and progresses through intermediate appellate courts to the highest court at the top.

    Read More

  • Constitution Protect Against Tyranny Essay

    557 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Judicial Branch is the judge of any laws that the President or Congress passes, they decide if the law goes along with the Constitution. Without this system our government would fall into a complete disaster and most likely become a dictatorship. Given these points, it is obvious that the power in our government needs to be

    Read More

  • Explain The Strengths Of The Judicial Branch

    1067 Words  | 5 Pages

    Ultimately, the judicial branch has to go back to what the founding fathers intended for the court’s purpose and to use the power accordingly. To maintain the strength of the branch, the courts must think about what is constitutionally right. Their decisions should reflect the amendments as well. “Judicial power plays an important role in the rule of law, even while it comes frequently into tension with norms of democratic rule” (Friedman & Delaney, 2011, p. 57, para. 1). This is the only way that citizens will feel like their rights are truly protected.

    Read More

  • Judicial Branch Research Paper

    493 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Judicial branch decides the meaning of the law and how to apply it to real situations. It also decides whether a law breaks the rules of the Constitution. The Supreme Court which is part of the

    Read More

  • Summary Of Gerald Rosenberg's Book 'The Hollow Hope'

    710 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alex Frost Values: Law & Society 9/23/2014 The Hollow Hope Introduction and Chapter 1 Gerald Rosenberg begins his book by posing the questions he will attempt to answer for the reader throughout the rest of the text: Under what conditions do courts produce political and social change? And how effective have the courts been in producing social change under such past decisions as Roe v. Wade and Brown v. Board of Education? He then works to define some of the principles and view points 'currently' held about the US Supreme court system.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Broken Bench

    247 Words  | 1 Pages

    The article Broken Bench explains the controversy over having “tiny courts” in New York State. The author, William Glaberson argues that the idea of justice within the jurisdiction of these tiny courts is unfairly decided among the justices in charge. Due to the lack of experience of these justices, it is difficult for fair justice to be dealt out. One of the major causes explained by the author for unfair justice is that the justices of the court are very inexperienced. For example, William Glaberson states, “Nearly three-quarters of the judges are not lawyers, and many — truck drivers, sewer workers or laborers — have scant grasp of the most basic legal principles.

    Read More

  • The Constrained Court

    429 Words  | 2 Pages

    Courts prove unsuccessful in achieving social change due to the constraints on the court’s power. Rosenburg’s assessment that courts are “an institution that is structurally challenged” demonstrates the Constrained Court view. In this view, the Court’s lack of judicial independence, inability to implement policies, and the limited nature of constitutional rights inhibit courts from producing real social reform. For activists to bring a claim to court, they must frame their goal as a right guaranteed by the constitution, leading to the courts hearing less cases (Rosenburg 11). The nature of the three branches also creates a system of checks and balances in which Congress or the executive branch can reverse a controversial decision, rendering the Court’s impact void.

    Read More

  • Three Levels Of The Federal Courts Essay

    492 Words  | 2 Pages

    The three levels within the federal courts are: the U.S. Magistrate Courts, the U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. Supreme Court. The magistrate courts are the lowest level and as such are limited to trying misdemeanors, setting bail amounts and assisting the district courts. The U.S. District Courts are the federal branch of original jurisdiction courts. These are responsible for criminal trials and giving guilty or not guilty verdicts. The U.S. Courts of Appeals are responsible for all the appeals from U.S. district courts.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Judicial Branch

    473 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Judicial branch, just like the other branches, have to provide checks and balances on the other branches. The Judicial branch's check on the Legislative branch is to as stated previously, remove any laws from order if they are deemed unconstitutional. This means that the Supreme Court will review the law, check all aspects of it to the constitution, and from here a law can now go two ways. It can be deemed constitutional and be left alone, or it can be deemed unconstitutional and be overridden.

    Read More

  • Essay On Judicial Selection

    801 Words  | 4 Pages

    This may cause a judge to render a decision based on obligation instead of holding true to their beliefs. This pressure is not easily felt as intensely by appointed judges, especially those with lengthy terms. In considering the equity of the pros and cons it is my opinion that the existing system in place works best. Every system is flawed.

    Read More

More about Judicial Branch Essay

Open Document