Introduction
The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa enjoins the three branches and organs of the state with the primary goal to strive for the democratic values that determine the way in which South Africa should be governed, and are thus enshrined and reside within the Constitution, which is the highest law of the land. Section 165(2) of the Constitution1 declares that the courts are independent and subject only to the Constitution and the law, which they must apply impartially and without fear, favour or prejudice. No person or organ of state may interfere with the functioning of the courts2. Organs of state are directed to assist and protect the courts, through legislative and other measures, to ensure their independence3. The
…show more content…
The doctrine is responsible for the separation of the three main spheres of government, which include the Legislative, the Executive and the Judiciary. Within the constitutional framework, the legislative, executive as well as the judiciary, all play an immense role in the importance in the governing of the Republic of South Africa. One can state that the Legislative authority thus has the power to make, amend and repeal any rules of law. The Executive authority is responsible for the power to execute and enforce rules of law. Lastly, the judicial authority has the power if there is a dispute, to determine what the law is and how it should be applied in the disputes5.
1 Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996.
2 The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. Section 165(3).
3 The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. Section 165(4).
4 Valente v The Queen [1985] 2 SCR 673.
5 IM Rautenbach Constitutional Law 4 ed (2003) at p 78.
President Omar
…show more content…
This case clearly states that the Constitutional Court (CC) held that while the legislature may not delegate plenary law-making powers to the executive, the legislature may however, delegate a subordinate law-making powers. The court had confirmed reservation of plenary law making for the legislature and made it non-negotiable. This is because it is necessary and of paramount importance for the effective
In order to strengthen the government, three branches were put into place, each holding specific powers. These include the Legislative branch which creates laws, “To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers…” (2: Source A). The Executive branch that is meant to enforce laws, “He shall take care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States” (2: Source A). Lastly, the Judicial branch interprets the laws created, “The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity arising under this Constitution…” (2: Source A).
Regulating the branches of government is crucial to the success of our country, so the constitution laid out the concept of “checks and balances”. For example, the president can veto any bill passed by legislature. In this case, the executive branch checks the legislative branch of government. If this wasn’t possible, congress could pass any bill they want, and ultimately become a powerhouse. These guidelines help keep the government intact, and in turn keep the constitution intact.
Before the Revolutionary war beginning in 1775, the thirteen American colonies were controlled by the British without serious issues. Each colony had its own representative for its local government in terms of making and practicing laws with being supervised by the governor dispatched by the British. Moreover, all thirteen colonies were required to comply with the laws made by the British Parliament. It is possible to say that the colonial settles were proud of being the British citizens.
The legislative, executive, and judicial branches each have ways to check the power of another branch. Congress has the power to approve and confirm Presidential nominations, override a President’s veto, impeach the President and remove him or her from office, and impeach judges from office. The President can nominate judges and veto Congressional legislation. The Court has the rights to declare presidential acts and laws unconstitutional. “...the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other…
Robert Isenhour Federal Government 110 10/10/17 Judicial Review Judicial Review had been obsolete until 1803 when the need for it arose in the case of Marbury vs. Madison, where it was then found to become a new component to the Judicial Branch. I am here to discuss why judicial review is and shall remain a doctrine commonly used in constitutional law. Judicial Review is the power for courts to review other government branches to determine the validity of its actions whether it be constitutional or unconstitutional. These ‘acts’ can be described as legislation passed by congress, presidential orders and actions, or all state and local governmental actions.
Courts prove unsuccessful in achieving social change due to the constraints on the court’s power. Rosenburg’s assessment that courts are “an institution that is structurally challenged” demonstrates the Constrained Court view. In this view, the Court’s lack of judicial independence, inability to implement policies, and the limited nature of constitutional rights inhibit courts from producing real social reform. For activists to bring a claim to court, they must frame their goal as a right guaranteed by the constitution, leading to the courts hearing less cases (Rosenburg 11). The nature of the three branches also creates a system of checks and balances in which Congress or the executive branch can reverse a controversial decision, rendering the Court’s impact void.
Overview: The Articles of Confederation written by the second continental congress, came in effect on March 1, 1781, was the first constitution of the United States. The articles established a weak central government which led the states having more power and creating conflict. The Articles of Confederation lacked the power of trade and commerce, states had separate currencies, and even different militias. Although the Articles of Confederation were scraped, it became a learning point and the basis of our constitution that has lasted over 200 years and counting.
“How Did the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny?” In the year of 1787, delegates met in Philadelphia to write the Constitution. Tyranny, which is a type of government with an absolute ruler, was a fear. For James Madison and the delegates, it was a challenge for them to write the Constitution that could be strong enough to hold the people and the states together without anybody taking over too much control. James Madison’s idea between central and state governments if Federalism (Document A).
2- The constitution of the judiciary department might be inexpedient to insist rigorously on the principal. The system of checks and balances is one of the big ones. This gives all 3 branches of government about the same power but over certain things. They are all ruled over
Hana Kim Professor Yvonne Wollenberg Law and Politics 106 7 October 2015 Title In the United States government, there are three branches called the legislative, executive, and judicial branch. Out of these three, the judicial branch is the most powerful. The judicial branch is made up of the Supreme Court, the court with the most power in the country, and other federal courts that are lower in the system; the purpose of this branch is to look over laws and make sure they are constitutional and reasonable.
By allowing the judicial branch to interpret the law so that the executive branch can implement and enforce it, the United States government has found a way to combat this issue caused by divided government. Though divided government has been known to create problems, they can be overcome. Solutions such as these can keep the government functioning
Ethics is described as the moral believes by which a person will conduct a specific activity. It is these moral believes between the client and legal professional that need to agree to decide the outcome of the case. This essay will handle with legal ethics regarding to being a fit and proper person, the clients needs, professional conduct, professional responsibility and the legal system in South Africa. Before being admitted as a legal professional a person needs to be regarded as being a fit and proper person to practice the noble and precise field of law. The requirement of being fit and proper is seen as one of the most important characteristics of the legal profession but is not to be found in legislation nor is it defined.
Do you ever wonder if the separation of powers in the government is important or not? The Separation of powers among the branches of the government is important because it makes sure that one branch or group of people/a person is not overpowering the rest of the government. The Separation of powers also ensures that the government is listening to the citizens and is keeping the rights and liberties that the citizens have. In this essay, i will explain to you how each branch of the government ensures that the other branches abide to the constitution and ensure that they keep the promise of Freedom and the rights of the citizen. Topic from yellow Each branch of the government makes sure that the other branches are not overpowering or breaking
In recent decades, billions of dollars have been spent by the World Bank and other development agencies on developing the rule of law around the world—however with limited and relatively low success rates. To explain it precisely, the principle is that no one is above the law. The principle is intended to be a protection against arbitrary governance, whether by a dictator or by oligarchy. Thus, the rule of law is hostile both to monarchy and to anarchy.
Malaysian judiciary refers to the Malaysian court system. It is an independent body separate from the legislative and executive arms of government. The role of courts is to ensure the law and order are followed, that justice is done, and criminals are punished. The head of the judiciary is the Chief Justice.