Julius Caesar And Brutus Comparison Essay
This essay highlights the similarities and differences of the characters, Mark Antony and Brutus, in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare. It’s easiest to say a few similarities first. Both characters wanted power and were willing to kill for it, whether it was Mark Antony trying to kill Brutus or Brutus killing himself for the better of Rome. Brutus says he will kill himself, as he killed Caesar, if he becomes a terrible leader like Caesar did. Another similarity is that both Mark Antony and Brutus are powerful speakers. Some of their differences throughout the play are their fight for power over Rome, their personal disposition throughout the play, and the persuasiveness in their speeches to the citizens of Rome, Antony uses his brain and Brutus is very naive.
Antony and Brutus have many differences in the play. First, their fight for power over Rome. In my opinion, I can argue both of their sides in this fight. Brutus killed
…show more content…
For example, Antony convinces the crowd that Caesar was a good man and they should all kill Brutus for what he has done to their “great leader.” Antony says in his speech to the citizens of Rome, “Ambition should be made of sterner stuff. Yet Brutus says he was ambitious; and Brutus is an honorable man.” Antony is smart and uses his brain to get what he wants, but Brutus on the other hand, is very naive.
Brutus is naive because he spoke to the citizens’ emotions and not to what he wants them think like Antony did. Brutus wants the crowd to be happy that Caesar is dead. Which they are, but Antony convinces them not to be. Brutus says to the citizens in his speech, “If any, speak, for him have I offended. Who here is so vile that will not love his country? If any, speak, for him I have offended. I pause for a reply.” Brutus ' speech appeals to people 's logic. Mark Antony appeals to people 's
Julius Caesar: Analysis Of Tone In Funeral Speeches
882 Words | 4 PagesIn view of, Caesar becoming to ambitious, Brutus kills him. As Brutus begins to speak out at the funeral he asks,“Had you rather Caesar living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead to all free men?”(Shakespeare 42). With this
Brutus Use Of Ethos In Julius Caesar
394 Words | 2 PagesIn the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare , Brutus and Antony both have different ways of getting the people’s attention through their speeches. Brutus and Antony appeal to ethos, logos, and pathos. Both use them differently to manipulate the people. Brutus uses them to confuse the people to justify the killing of Caesar. Antony uses them to take advantage of the plebeians and turn them against Brutus.
Julius Caesar Essay: Brutus As A Traitor
574 Words | 3 PagesBrutus has a vision, and he intends it to work out in every way he plans. In a sense he achieves what he wants, and killing Caesar may have been crucial to his short-lived success.
Antony's Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In Julius Caesar
949 Words | 4 PagesAntony’s Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, after Caesar’s death, the Romans are conflicted about what should be done. After Brutus’ speech the Romans are ready to crown Brutus king and be on the conspirators’ side. Though Brutus then leaves the crowd while Antony delivers his speech, the crowd realizes what should be done of Caesar’s murder and Antony prevents the conspirators from getting away with the murder of Caesar.
Mark Antony's Use Of Rhetorical Strategies In Julius Caesar
937 Words | 4 PagesWhen it comes to murder, the culprit almost always rationalizes his or her actions to make them seem innocent in the situation. The murderer usually rationalizes their actions by using the victim's characteristics and using that to measure the value of the victim's life. In the play Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, Brutus and others decide to kill Caesar to protect the citizens of their home for they fear Caesar and his “ambition” would enslave the people of Rome. After they murder Caesar, Brutus speaks to the people to explain his actions and Mark Antony, one of Caesar's close companions, speaks on Caesar's behalf. Mark Antony was able to use rhetorical strategies better than Brutus in his speech in order to gain a level of
Julius Caesar Ethos Pathos Logos
945 Words | 4 PagesWho is here so vile that will not love his country? If any, speak; for him I have offended.” (3.2.113) This tactic is being used to make the crowd feel proud of their country, and guilty if they don’t agree with Antony. One of the things that makes Brutus better, when concerning these criteria, is that he openly expected a reaction from the crowd which inclined them to give him one.
Powerful Words In Julius Caesar
521 Words | 3 PagesJulius Caesar Essay Words are more powerful than weapons. Throughout the play of Julius Caesar the idea of powerful words is a key theme. Through speeches lies and cunning plans the characters in this play are able to convince people to join conspiracies and move people to action. This play reflects on the need for excellent speaking skills and its importance in ancient Rome, Elizabethan, and modern times.
Historical Inaccuracies In Julius Caesar
1050 Words | 5 PagesSome playwrights choose to write plays about historical events, among them there is The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, a play that describes the downfall of the rule of Julius Caesar, but is also a play that is not as truthful as it first impressionably is, a complete truthful account of Julius Caesar’s assassination and the events leading up to it. In order to greater attract the audience, Shakespeare, along with other playwrights, relied on adding historical inaccuracies to add the necessary suspense. Thus, Shakespeare strayed away from historical events occurring during Caesar’s lifetime, implementing inaccuracy into the story. Shakespeare based one of his most well-known plays, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, on historical events that includes
Julius Caesar Ethos Pathos Logo Analysis
754 Words | 4 PagesBrutus and Antony use ethos, logos, and pathos in their speeches to convince the commoners of their side of the story. One person just so happens to be more convincing than the other. Using ethos,
Traits Of Brutus In Julius Caesar
935 Words | 4 PagesBrutus, According to Shakespeare The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, a Shakespearean play and representation of the assassination of Caesar, is a well written and developed story in which the build up of the characters is very well done. As a matter of fact, the developing of Brutus, the tragic hero on the play, is one of the most important characters and therefore one of the better explained and exposed. Brutus is a character that is marked with three traits that allow him to be the one responsible for Caesar's assassination. Indeed, Brutus is naive, well-intended and hypocrite, as seen when the conspirators convince him to be part of it, and be one of the most important figures in it.
Ethical Appeal In Julius Caesar
818 Words | 4 PagesBrutus wants to make the crowd feel like he is in a way the victim. In order to do that he says "As Caesar loved me I weep for him" so in a way the people feel bad for him. This emotional appeal did not persuade the audience considering the fact that he was if he truly did love Caesar as much as he said he would, then he would have tried to find a different route in getting rid of Caesar as emperor. Antony goes with the approach of making the people of Rome feel guilty. He tells the citizens "You all love him once not without cause what cause withholds you then to mourn for him" so they could reflect on their attitude towards his death.
Effects Of Brutus On Society In Julius Caesar
522 Words | 3 PagesHe was unable to see through the fake letters that are supposedly written by the people of Rome, but in reality are being written as a scam from Cassius. Brutus interpreted these letters as a protest against Caesar. He believed the people of Rome were telling him their desires through this letter, he tries to resolve this by listening to the societies challenge to “speak, strike, redress” (II.i.47). Reading these letters from “random citizens” it is what finally pushes him over the edge.
Examples Of Brutus's Idealism
762 Words | 4 PagesBrutus has negatively affected the outlook of Rome and created more harm than good for the situation. Not only did it harm Rome, but it brought his own demise and hallucinations of Caesar’s ghost. Brutus’s speech to the plebeians after Caesar’s death, about his dilemma and his viewpoint towards Caesar, influenced the viewpoints of the plebeians and causes them to believe he is the best roman until Antony speaks to them. Brutus’s idealism led to his own death later on and brought him more misery than his idealism could
Renaissance Humanism In 'The Praise Of Folly'
1629 Words | 7 Pages// I come not, friends, to steal away your hearts: //… But as you know me all, a plain blunt man //… For I have neither wit, nor words, nor worth, // … I only speak right on” (JC, 3.2.210-225) clearly expresses his self-love and his adaptability as he paves the path for his own political interests by cleverly playing it respectful of the conspirators yet turning the Romans against them while keeping his position completely neutral and safe. On the other hand, Brutus’s use of appeal to logic, unlike Antony, at his eulogy for Caesar’s funeral, “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more //…
Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech
884 Words | 4 PagesBrutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar
More about Julius Caesar And Brutus Comparison Essay
Julius Caesar: Analysis Of Tone In Funeral Speeches
882 Words | 4 PagesBrutus Use Of Ethos In Julius Caesar
394 Words | 2 PagesJulius Caesar Essay: Brutus As A Traitor
574 Words | 3 PagesAntony's Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In Julius Caesar
949 Words | 4 PagesMark Antony's Use Of Rhetorical Strategies In Julius Caesar
937 Words | 4 PagesJulius Caesar Ethos Pathos Logos
945 Words | 4 PagesPowerful Words In Julius Caesar
521 Words | 3 PagesHistorical Inaccuracies In Julius Caesar
1050 Words | 5 PagesJulius Caesar Ethos Pathos Logo Analysis
754 Words | 4 PagesTraits Of Brutus In Julius Caesar
935 Words | 4 PagesEthical Appeal In Julius Caesar
818 Words | 4 PagesEffects Of Brutus On Society In Julius Caesar
522 Words | 3 PagesExamples Of Brutus's Idealism
762 Words | 4 PagesRenaissance Humanism In 'The Praise Of Folly'
1629 Words | 7 PagesCompare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech
884 Words | 4 Pages