ipl-logo

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

703 Words3 Pages

Presenting a speech, so it is effective, is not always an easy task. For instance, in Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony speak to the crowd back-to-back from each other, yet one speech in particular makes an impact on the crowd. After both monologues are given, it is crystal clear who is the most favorable of the two in the Roman’s eyes. One, in particular, used spectacular tactics so the crowd would change their point of view on the situation. However, the opposing man lacked the appropriate strategies, therefore it was not a hard decision for the crowd to choose who to side with. The answer to success and failure in these speeches is ethos, logos, and pathos. Consequently, it is obvious with all of the strategies used, who the real winner is. …show more content…

He takes a very formal standpoint when giving his speech. Antony, on the other hand, opens his by saying, “Friends, Romans, and countrymen” (Anderson 834). By taking this approach, he uses pathos and gives off more emotion by calling them his friends first. The honorable man Brutus, gives a formal speech in an extremely serious manner. He has everything planned out and is rational within his speech. Such as listing the reason Caesar had to die for. “I honor him; but, as he was ambitious, I slew him” (Anderson 831). His opposing force, Antony, has a calm tone that the citizens of Rome relate to. His persuasion techniques include pathos and he also uses a hyperbole. Antony says, “When the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept” (Anderson 835). Caesar actually crying is used as a misrepresentation to make the people believe he is just like them in a certain aspect. In other words, Antony knew who his audience was and how easy they could be manipulated, but Brutus did

Show More
Related

  • Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar

    166 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Brutus' speech he uses logos to try to reason with the crowd whilst Antony uses pathos to control their emotions. Brutus explains that for the betterment of Rome Caesar had to die or else he would ruin the country and destroy the great empire. He at first has everyone on his side, that is of course until Antony speaks. When Antony speaks he gives examples of how Caesar wasn't going to ruin Rome and in fact how he was the best leader they had ever had. He says that Brutus and Cassius are murderers and that's all they are.

    Read More

  • Thank You For Arguing By Jay Heinrichs And Lies My Teacher Told Me

    580 Words  | 3 Pages

    The book is full of speechwriting teachings for public speakers. In particular, it is based on the knowledge of the past such as Aristotle’s logos, pathos, and ethos concepts, and yet tailored for contemporary public speakers with a broad range of references to day-to-day persuasive instances (Heinrichs 231). Besides being highly informative, Jay Heinrichs’ book (Chapters 1 to 10) is also hilarious and dynamic. As earlier mentioned, the book covers the central rhetorical lessons of both Cicero and Aristotle. However, the author further cites fresh examples, centers on workplace, cultural, marketing and political references.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Marc Antony

    696 Words  | 3 Pages

    His acknowledgement of Brutus saying “[Caesar] was ambitious” (III.ii.82) followed immediately by his saying that Brutus “is an honorable man” (III.ii.83) repetitively shows the crowd that Antony is ungrateful for the conspirators allegedly saving Rome. This repetition becomes sarcastic, creating an ungrateful feeling throughout the crowd. He also repeats good traits of Caesar, including how “He was [Antony’s] friend, faithful and just to [Antony]” (III.ii.81) which establishes an emotional connection between him and the citizens. He uses aposiopesis to display how the assassination has affected him, once again using emotion to persuade the crowd to see the murder the same way he views it. He reminds the citizens that “when that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept” (III.ii.87) which establishes another emotional connection between the fallen leader and the

    Read More

  • Pathos In Julius Caesar

    850 Words  | 4 Pages

    After tragedies, public speakers have taken advantage of their ability to voice their thoughts and opinions through speeches. By observing not only the speaker’s motivations but also their approach, the effectiveness of their speech can differ based on their execution. Strategically wording these speeches in their favor, Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare demonstrates the immense power of words through the speeches of Marcus Brutus and Marc Antony. Theodore D. Roosevelt also deems himself a credible example of a speaker who used their platform to affect a crowd in some way.

    Read More

  • Gettysburg Speech And Glory Road Rhetorical Strategies

    833 Words  | 4 Pages

    What makes a speech effective? Using rhetoric, a person can appeal to others emotion and logic to persuade a person into doing a desired action. They can encourage a person into success or they can discourage a person into wanting to prove others wrong. The two speeches that will be discussed in this paper will be from Remember the Titans Gettysburg Speech and Glory Road Final game speech. The Gettysburg speech was made in the middle of movie.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Pathos

    708 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the play Julius Caesar by, Julius Shakespeare, both Antony and Brutus give speeches after Caesar died. Brutus tells the people that it was for the good of Rome and had to be done. Brutus also backs up his claim by giving examples of how “ambitious” Caesar was. Antony on the other hand wanted to persuade the Roman people that what Brutus and the conspirators was wrong and they need to seek revenge. Both Antony and Brutus use Ethos, Logos, and Pathos, which are tools used in speaking or writing to persuade people.

    Read More

  • Comparing Aristotle's Rhetoric, Ethos, And Logos

    1377 Words  | 6 Pages

    Primarily used to persuade potential voters for support in election or legislation being championed by the individual or party. To that end, they employ each of Aristotle’s artistic proofs, Ethos, Pathos, and Logos in very artful ways. Unquestionably, one of the greatest politicians of the United Staes, President Ronald Reagan who earned the moniker “the great communicator,” utilized rhetoric effectively. Undoubtedly, on of his most significancy and memorable speeches took place in June of 1987, speaking to an audience of world leaders in front of the famous Brandenburg Gate in West Berlin, Reagan masterfully demonstrated each of the proofs. Admittedly, “President Ronald Reagan, almost by definition, had quite a bit of extrinsic ethos.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Ethos In Julius Caesar

    637 Words  | 3 Pages

    Worried that the crowd had been completely convinced by Brutus’s words, Antony had to persuade them to be on his side, so he began his speech by appealing to their emotions or pathos. He begins his speech by calling them “Friends, Romans, Countrymen”. Being classified as his friends, Romans, and countrymen is a compliment to most people, and appeals to their emotions by feeling as if you have a strong bond with one another. By showing them that he has a bond with them, he is showing them he is not there to change their mind, but instead to talk to them as the “friends” that they are. Later, he uses empathy by telling the crowd, “You are not wood, you are not stones, but men;”.

    Read More

  • Antony's Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In Julius Caesar

    949 Words  | 4 Pages

    Antony uses rhetorical appeals and techniques in his speech to turn the people of Rome against those conspiring against Caesar. As a result, the people see Antony as a persuasive and strong leader of Rome. Antony opens his speech at Caesar’s funeral by using ethos to present himself as a credible source and a friend of Caesar. Antony states his purpose in the beginning of his speech by starting with “I come to bury

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    833 Words  | 4 Pages

    By refusing to read the will several times and admitting that what it contains will cause the people to have such a great love for Caesar that knowing he is now dead will be unbearable, Antony ignites curiosity in the people and furthermore, a subconscious feeling of respect and graciousness toward Caesar. Basically, Antony uses Caesar’s will to convince the people that Caesar was a selfless, kind-hearted man and those who killed him should be ashamed and punished for killing an innocent man. Through Antony’s use of paralipsis, he is able to plant a seed of admiration for Caesar and one of hate for the conspirators in the hearts of the plebeians. In his speech to the citizens, Antony also asks many rhetorical questions to cause his audience to pause and reflect on how they really feel, or how Antony wants them to feel, about certain people and events that have recently become important. In one instance.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Devices Used In Brutus And Antony's Speech

    721 Words  | 3 Pages

    The appeals in Antony’s speech were persuasively better than the use of them in Brutus’s speech. Marc Antony uses all three appeals in his speech to make a very sturdy argument. An example of logos in his speech is when he states, “He hath brought many captives home to Rome Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill: Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” This speech is Antony stating facts of Caesar’s work which proves that he is not ambitious and does not deserve to be killed. Antony also uses ethos and pathos when he says, “He was my friend, faithful and just to me.”

    Read More

  • Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar

    437 Words  | 2 Pages

    At the funeral, both of Caesar’s friends, Brutus and Antony, made a speech. In Brutus’s speech he was very concise and was saying that he did it all for Rome. Brutus used logos and ethos in his speech. To fortify his speech, he used logos which is logic and reason. In his speech, he says listen to my reasons and he goes onto his reasons that Caesar would have become ambitious and enslaved them all.

    Read More

  • Antony's Use Of Ethos In Julius Caesar

    809 Words  | 4 Pages

    He shows this when he says “If I were to dispose, or stir your hearts and mind to mutiny and rage, I should do Brutus wrong…” He is pretending to care for the feelings of Brutus while making him seem worse to the audience while making Caesar seem as the righteous man Antony believed him to be. Antony’s speech about Julius Caesar was better than Brutus’ speech because he made the citizens believe it. Regardless of the things said, whether true or false he made the citizens believe in him which is important.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Rhetorical Appeals In Julius Caesar

    900 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the play, the two speeches contrast on the choice of rhetorical appeals towards the crowd. Brutus's speech, as the reader can see, appeals to the logic of the crowd while Mark Antony appeals to the emotions or pathos of the crowd. Brutas goes first when delivering the speech, his speech is quick and to the point. While trying not to cause chaos in the crowd, Brutas talks highly of himself to make himself seem honorable to the crowd. Brutas says "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more" (Shakespeare 3.2).

    Read More

  • Discuss The Use Of Pathos In Julius Caesar

    705 Words  | 3 Pages

    He uses his skill of appealing to the crowds emotion to persuade them that Brutus did not kill Caesar out of the good of Rome. Antony states, “O, judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts, and men have lost their reason.” He gives reasons why Caesar is not ambitious and did not deserve to be killed. One of the reasons Caesar was not ambitious is because “when that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept: Ambition should be made of sterner stuff.”

    Read More

More about Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

Open Document