Julius Caesar's Influence On The Roman Government

However some may postulate that Brutus was a noble man in killing Caesar and “saving” Rome. After all Caesar was becoming an overeager tyrant that wanted to take over Rome. Brutus was benevolent in saving the republic rather than let a ruthless tyrant rule Rome. This argument fails to consider that Caesar “hath brought many captives home to Rome whose ransoms did the general coffers fill. ”(5.1.87-88)

Roosevelt changed America with the New Deal. Yes, it failed its utmost purpose of being created but it did refine economic security and stability. The New Deal made numerous jobs and if it wasn’t for America being the employer of citizens, millions of people would have been unable to provide from themselves and their families. Unemployment rates moderately decreased but profuse numbers of individuals were still jobless. When, the New Deal helped workers, it excessively favored white males.

The Romans were able to conquer the Gauls because Caesar had a large understating of their manner, while the Romans failed to conquer the Germans because there was a strong ignorance between the two people. Ever since the Gaul’s sacked Rome in 390 BC the Romans have obsessed over them. There is a strong interest in the entirety of their culture, politics, war, class system, and religions. The first person to create a major study of Gaul is Posidonius. He laid down the

But, Julius Caesar was considered arrogant to the people. People started to get suspicious when he made some political reforms which gave him more power than his peers. Julius Caesar had many occupations in his life.

During the Roman Empire, Dictator Julius Caesar had such a great impact in the world. Just to name a few, Britain, France and Germany became Roman states because he had a large influence on them. One of his most popular saying is “I came, I saw, I conquered”. Caesar's quote means that he knows he is powerful, he wants to rule the world and have every country to become a roman state. Many people from the Senate become scared of Caesar because they see that he is almost unstoppable.

Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus Germanicus was a homicidal maniac who because of his family name became emperor of the ancient civilization of Rome.1 Gaius is better known as Caligula from when he was a child traveling with Germanicus on war campaigns in the north. History records him in the first half of his reign as as respectable emperor who the people loved, but after falling severely sick the second half records him as a unintelligent psycho who had blood lust.2 Caligula’s qualities applied to present day would surely be interesting. Caligula would likely live a lavished lifestyle supplied from his rich family and enjoy the world because of all the new things he could use and abuse. Caligula’s lifestyle would of course lead to jail from his

So Cassius, being his manipulative self, persuaded Brutus to join by telling him that Caesar was just as good as the next man. Cassius had someone else leave forged letters from Roman

Later on, a group of men formed The First and Second Triumvirates taking controlled over Rome which it all ended with the group of men defeating each other. The Romans

Those partners were named Crassus, and Pompey. Together their power doubled and they soon became the only political figures that mattered in Rome, in “60 B.C.E, they formed the first Triumvirate” (Knight). Even though their unification strengthened their power and proved themselves the rightful rulers of Rome, their alliance was not one that the three men enjoyed or preferred. The three men promptly went their separate ways, Caesar went to “Gaul, anxious to gain more military glory, began seeking war, and soon he found it” (Knight). He fought the Helvetii, from “present-day Swizterland”, the “Suebi from Germany”, the “Celts of Britain”; he “killed around a million people from 55 to 54 B.C.E.” (Knight).

He supports the republic and system of government guided by the votes of the senators. He does not, however, support dictatorship “What’s means this shouting? I do fear the people choose Caesar for their king (I, I) Brutus’ gullibility is ironically one of his purest character traits yet a fatal flaw. Another tragic flaw of his is that he had a lust for power, and because of this Brutus meets his death at the end of this play.

Julius Caesar was excepted at the completion of his education to assume a modest office on the lower end of the long ladder of the Roman political career. however, Julius Caesar was not like other Romans. At a young age he had realized that money was the key to Roman politics as the system had by his time long been corrupt. When he was fifteen years old his father died, with him died the fatherly expectations that Julius Caesar should engage on a modest political career. Instead, Julius Caesar had set out to better himself.

In Julius Caesar, the two speeches are compared a lot. But most people would say Mark Antony's speech was more effective. And it was. But what people fail to mention is that Brutus' speech was equally great.

Persuasion can cause crowds to riot, it can change someone's mind about anything because persuasion could possibly be one of the most powerful things in the World. In Julius Caesar, William Shakespeare gives us examples of why persuasion could be one of the most powerful things in the World. In Julius Caesar, Antony gives this wonderful speech about why these Conspirators are bad guys. Antony and Brutus both give two great speeches but Antony's speech is way more