Jury Deliberation Case

When someone discusses the social disorganization theory it is currently focus on the relationship between people crimes social control and deviant’s behaviors caused by the environment for example if u live in an area where most crimes were to happen like domestic abuse drug trafficking or gang violence then the people around or more likely to commit crimes than ones who live in good neighborhoods. Today in our community crime effects schools work even our own homes. According to Na’im H. Madyun the author of Connecting

The jury system originated in England hundreds of years ago. The colonists brought the jury system from England to the United States. In 1733, John Zenger, a printer, printed a newspaper critical for the British Government. His attorney convinced the jury to be in favor for Zenger because his criticisms were true. After this trial, it gave ordinary citizens the freedom of speech and the power to go against the king. The Founding Fathers wanted the people of the United States to be in a democracy or self-government and established the jury system into the constitution. It is expensive and is a long process to start a jury trial. Also, jurors are not as professional as judges and can not determine a fair verdict. The Crime Scene Investigation (CSI) effect might also affect the verdict of the jury. The American jury system should not be used because of it not being cost-effective, the lack of experience of the jury, which leads to justice not being served, and the CSI effect impacting the

"Jury System; a system in which the verdict in a legal case is decided by a jury on the basis of evidence submitted to it in court." Starting at eighteen, you become eligible for jury duty – something many have to do as one of our civic duties, however, it wasn 't always this way. As far as historians know, the jury was established by William the Conqueror who brought it to England from Normandy. However, this system that he brought was nothing more than a system that had witnesses who knew of the matter in question to tell the court what they knew.

Along time ago there was a king in England who would take colonists homes, put us in prison, and not tell us why. The king would take our guns which we needed to protect ourselves back then. We got into a war when we were trying to free ourselves from England. We won the war so we created a new government. But we wanted to have some rules the government has to follow so this new government doesn 't do the same thing the old garment did. This was called the bill of rights which was the first 10 amendments to our constitution.

“the right to a speedy and public, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.”

In a criminal case, I do not believe the answer is as simple as a yes or no to whether one opts for a jury trial or leave it up to a judge. Recently, in Baltimore, six police officers were charged with criminal offenses by the district attorney in the death of Freddie Gray. One officer resulted in a hung jury and later all charges were dropped. All other officers had a judge either dismiss charges or find them not guilty. Politics were at play in this heavily covered case by national media. I remember watching the news and was surprised to learn that many of the officers were allowing a judge to rule on their case. I think a particular jurisdiction has a lot to do with what is the right decision. Unfortunately, many judges do not represent

Under the Sixth Amendment. The Sixth Amendment guarantees a criminal defendant the right to impartial jury. The jury will consider the evidence against the defendant and decide whether to find him or her guilty of the crime. Twelve jurors must agree in order to find a defendant guilty or not guilty. If the jury fails to reach a unanimous verdict and finds itself at a standstill, the judge may declare a mistrial. Then the case may be dismissed or the trial may start all over again (LC).

Out of the over 350,000 cases brought to trial in the United States District Courts in 2016, almost 275,000 of them were civil and nearly 80,000 were criminal. No matter the type of case brought to court, both present evidence in front of a judge, resulting in a sentence after careful deliberation. Although there are multiple similarities between civil law and criminal law, there are many differences that differentiate the two as well.

Drama, often defined as the visual form of literature, can be seen as a mix of both realistic and unrealistic elements. Through drama, playwrights can develop plays that reflect our society and societal issues, consolidating different aspects of the real world to indirectly communicate with the audience. Reginald Rose's 1954 play, the 'Twelve Angry Men' is an excellent example of this, with recurring themes of racial bias, discrimination and social inequality woven deep into the plot, allowing him to convey his messages accurately and indirectly to the reader. The 12 conflicting titular characters each represent different ideologies and perspectives, which can greatly reflect how they react towards the situation faced.

Everyone has the right to a trial by jury is a practice that the United States adapted from England common law.

Anatomy of a Jury, written by Seymour Wishman, is a captivating murder mystery set in 1982 in Essex County, New Jersey located in a tension filled criminal court. Anatomy of a Jury is a nonfiction novel that employs the research conducted by the University of Chicago Jury Project to investigate into the grueling process of selecting a jury for the trial of a criminal case. This could sound as if we are indulging into a book with two different premises from a quick glance. That is Seymour Wishman’s point that he is trying to get at by doing so. Seymour Wishman, a renown criminal lawyer, wanted a chance to inform the public about the captivating institution of the jury selection in American courts, but needed a platform in which to do so. Knowing

James Joseph Bulger III (better known as) Whitey Bulger’s criminal behavior started early on in life. Whitey ran away to join the circus at ten years old. According to Biography.com, “Whitey Bulger was first arrested when he was 14 years old, for stealing, and his criminal record continued to escalate from there. As a youth, he was arrested for larceny, forgery, assault and battery, and armed robbery and served five years in a juvenile reformatory. Upon his release, he joined the Air Force where he served time in military jail for assault before being arrested for going AWOL. Nonetheless, he received an honorable discharge in 1952.” (Biography.com) After the military, Bulger returned to Boston and committed multiple bank

The emotional pain that Juries feel after acquitting anyone who should be guilty could take a burden on one 's life. After doing research on Juror B-29, I found that her life was turned upside down because of public information, for the Juror 's life has been destroyed and caused her distress all because she was in the process of eviction, in addition to how much anger her friends feel towards her after hearing the verdict (Uwumarogie, 2013).

The din clattering of the party slowly ceased and the noise stopped. A small ringing in my ears was the only thing that I could hear, and then zilch. I relaxed into the mattress of my bed and closed my eyes, happy I now had some peace and quiet. But as they say, silence is deafening. Although that 's true, my conscience slowly slipped away and I fell into a deep slumber.

Gentlemen of the Jury. You have come to the final judgement in this trial. You all know very well about the crime Tom Robinson has taken part in and you know very well of the distress and discomfort young Mayella has endured.