Jury System Should Not Be Abolished In Africa Essay

1883 Words8 Pages

A jury should not be reinstated in South Africa
The South African legal system has developed thoroughly over time. It has undergone different changes which represent the character of its legal system. A large part of its change is signified in the jury system. The jury system in South Africa was abolished in 1969 by the Abolition of Juries Act 34. The decline of juries in South Africa was a result of fears of racial issues within jury members which would give South Africa more complex race relations, the “widespread exemptions leaving few competent jury candidates” ,“the widespread discrepancies in education between various South Africans” As a result of the reasons mentioned above and many others which will be mentioned in the essay a jury …show more content…

A jury system could potentially be able to fix the South African law system by addressing the illegitimacy of courts however reinstating a jury system would not eliminate the problems but rather create bigger ones.
A jury system dates back to 5th century Before …show more content…

The system is said to not work because judges who make judgements are given thorough training and are taught to give judgements based on facts that are given. The South African legal system also contains faults in making thorough investigations. There are faults in the manner in which forensics make their investigations, leaving out important evidence which could have an impact on the case at hand. As a result of this the source mentions the fact that the judges are trained to make judgements on evidence given even if investigations have not been made thoroughly. Therefore a jury system would not work in relation to this because there would be twelve other people gathering up their opinions and make judgements based on other factors rather than the facts or evidence at

Open Document