ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Just War Theory

1023 Words5 Pages

Present security environment and conditions for geopolitical relations and conflicts, shows that old postulates of traditional and conventional warfare, are not in function any more. New type of threats brings changes and different opinions in legal, ethical and moral domains of war. In some situations, when war methods are not conventional, under internationally acceptable conditions, key legal documents, such as Chapter of the United Nations, can become insufficient or irrelevanct. This unconventional sphere requires radical changes in existing legislations or completely new world wide acceptable definition of combatant, adversary and war.
Framework of war conditions, which we usually call conventional, becomes more blurred and different. …show more content…

Terrorist attack on United States of America on 11 September 2001, is milestone for future defining of conditions and demands in perception of dilemma’s solutions. This essay will follow evolution, principles and explanations of just war theory and its applicability in pre-emptive actions on different circumstances and different causes. It will argue reasons pro and con for justification of war and pre-emptive strike as not precisely defined area in legal and moral domain. At the end essay will provide some recommendations for possible solutions of …show more content…

Augustine (Aurelius Augustinus, C.E. 354-430). Principles that he introduce are base for lather international juristically system and still valid in present international relations. This theory, principles or conditions that war could be justified is applied, is more developed in ethical domain by St. Thomas Aquinas (1225 – 1274) and the others scholars. Related to conditions of war, theory is divided in three

Show More
Related

  • The Pros And Cons Of The War Powers Resolution

    645 Words  | 3 Pages

    The poor drafting of the WPR since the sections of the War Powers Resolution does not mention for example any procedures or what the congress can do when the president choose not to comply with the resolution. In addition the Congress unwillingness to enforced it over the years made it unsuccessful to be fully functional, that is why the United States Presidents had exploited some faults in the War Powers Resolution to undermine it, however the Congress, has the absolute powers to enforce it yet they did not, and so the WPR came through ups and downs due to its disadvantageous text and vagueness and resulted in ongoing tug of war in the Congress itself between the House and the Senate (Teacher. Law, 2013). If we look to the main function behind

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The War Powers Resolution

    1152 Words  | 5 Pages

    Since its enactment in 1973, The War Powers Resolution has been a point of tension between the executive and legislative branches. It is a resolution that prompts the commander in chief to exercise his war powers “only pursuant to a declaration of war, specific statutory authorization from Congress, or a national emergency created by an attack upon the United States.” It places a set of requirements on the president for the introduction of armed forces into hostilities, including a forty-eight hour period for the notification of congress, and a sixty day period for withdrawal of troops in the absence of a war declaration, with an additional thirty days for the safe removal of troops. It also requires the president to consult with congress when

    Read More

  • How Did Dwight D Eisenhower Use Pathos In The Cold War

    830 Words  | 4 Pages

    He emphasizes that warfare is not in the future of the United States and that it only wants peace for itself and all other countries. The audience will sway more with Eisenhower’s thesis because they were provided with valid statements that left an impact on viewpoints towards

    Read More

  • Michael Kimmel 9/11 Rhetorical Analysis

    802 Words  | 4 Pages

    A great terror struck our nation September 11, 2001, two aircraft’s hit the world trade centers, killing 2000 people and injuring over twice as many. A third aircraft flew into the Pentagon while a fourth crashed in a rural area in Pennsylvania. This day will forever be engrained into history as one of the worst terror attacks faced in this nation. Nearly three years later, in an attempt to figure out what happened on that tragic day, scholars came together to discuss the possible parallels between foreign and domestic terrorist. The author, Michael Kimmel, outlines the possible cause of the 2001 attacks and offers us a link between both foreign and domestic terrorism.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of War Hawks

    281 Words  | 2 Pages

    The War of 1812 and the urge that the War Hawks had to declare war on Britain caused social, political, and geographical changes between the years 1812 to 1815. The War Hawks were a group of pro-war Jeffersonian Republicans. Since the War Hawks were pro-war, they strongly advised Congress to declare war on Britain in 1812. It has been proven that when the time came to vote, most states voted in support of war. Most people voted in support of the war because of the War Hawks.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of War Power Resolution

    1042 Words  | 5 Pages

    War Power Resolution: A Failure The United States has a developed government system that composes three separate branches which cooperate with each other; however in some particular areas such as war powers, there are conflicting ideas about which branch must have the most power. The constitution does not make a clear statement about that, and there are many different interpretations about what is implied in the constitution. Throughout the history, the country experienced many wars and sometimes blamed the president for the consequences of the wars. After the Vietnam War, the Congress made a resolution of War Powers which reminds that the Congress has the authority to declare war. War Power Resolution seems to have failed, because the result

    Read More

  • Just War Theory: The American Revolutionary War

    727 Words  | 3 Pages

    War is a conflict that has been seen by every human civilization to some extent, and is sure to be seen by those in the future. These hostile situations can be caused by a variety of situations, including land, resources, philosophy, and religion. Though the exact cause and result of each war is different, there are ways to gauge the effectiveness and permissibility of the actions of governments and armed forces during war. This is the premise of Just War Theory. Just War is philosophy of rating a war as ethically just or not, which has three basic requirements along with a scale for comparison.

    Read More

  • Was Hiroshima Bombing Justified

    1723 Words  | 7 Pages

    In the sixty years since World War 2, President Truman 's decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan has been questioned by many people. The bombing caused many deaths but also clearly marked the end of the long drawn-out war. The justifications for the bombing are still however a widely discussed debate. Arguments supporting the justification of the bombing involve the President 's stern belief that the Japanese had brought it on themselves, and that the bombing would end the war and save many American lives. The counter-arguments were that the Japanese were already defeated and so ‘why was it necessary to drop the bomb?”.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of American War

    652 Words  | 3 Pages

    Every day, there are students, just like me, who sit and stare at their teacher's, stone-faced. The only concept floating around our minds is why we are forced to spend a chunk of our day unearthing the history of deceased white guys. First, we speak of the establishment of Jamestown, and its path that was paved on failure. Next, it’s the mistakenly named massacre that killed 5 individuals, and among them was Crispus Attucks, a freed black slave. Despite the plenitude of time periods, events, and ideas in American History, a specific event that was between Great Britain and France has left me entirely baffled and bewildered; the French and Indian War.

    Read More

  • Ethical Dilemmas: The Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb

    1990 Words  | 8 Pages

    The Decision to Drop the Bomb In the Battle of Okinawa 1941, Japanese Kamikaze suicide pilots targeted the US in Hawaii’s Pearl Harbor. Over 2,400 American and British lives were taken from this world, an additional 1,178 wounded. The President of the United States, Harry Truman, was faced with an ethical dilemma of whether to use the atomic bomb against Japan that could end WWII. My goal is to try to answer this moral question using the philosophical views on the morality of Held, Kant, Aristotle, and Mill.

    Read More

  • 9/11 Public Policy

    544 Words  | 3 Pages

    After a terrorist attack of any kind there are always consequences that must be faced. Sometimes the point of the terrorist attacks is because the organization wished to send a message or to influence policy in their favor. However, after the 9/11 attacks administrators realized that the United States was not prepared for a tragedy of this kind and had little to no measures to prevent one, this lead them to create new programs and policies. Terrorist organization’s goal often comes down to one of the following: regime change, territorial change, policy change, social control and status quo maintenance. The main purpose of a terror attack may well be to influence public policy.

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Just War Theory

    1943 Words  | 8 Pages

    Just War theory judges war twice, first for the reason that the states are fighting for and secondly, the practises in which they adopt in the actual fighting. Jus Ad Bellum or justice of war provides the guidelines

    Read More

  • Realism Vs. Liberalism In International Relations

    902 Words  | 4 Pages

    The first great-war shattered the human mind so profound that out of its aftermaths’ emerged a fresh discipline (in 1919 at the University of Whales known to us as International Relations) proposed to prevent war. “It was deemed by the scholars that the study of International Politics shall find the root cause of the worlds political problems and put forward solutions to help politicians solve them” (Baylis 2014:03). International Relations happened to play the role of a ‘correcting-mechanism’ restoring the world order of peace and amity by efforting at its best to maintain the worlds’ status quo. However with the emergence of a second world war much more massive that the first put at stake all the values of that young discipline of IR. The

    Read More

  • Comparing Augustine On War And Force

    1417 Words  | 6 Pages

    However, Aquinas goes into more detail and has more circumstances for a just war than Augustine. Aquinas believes that someone in power should be declaring war, and that war should not be declared by a single person. War should not be used as one’s benefit, but rather a nation’s benefit. Lastly, Aquinas talks about a just cause, which Augustine talks about in another writing. Aquinas and Augustine both agree that a just cause must be something along the lines of that a nation causes great harm in one way or another and refuses to make reparation.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The United Nations Charter

    1556 Words  | 7 Pages

    Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter states that, "all member states shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, nor in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations” . It is therefore a unilateral agreement signed by member states against the use of force when dealing each other. World events however since the signing and ratification of the UN Charter have indicated that states who are signatories to the charter continue to use force against each other for various reasons. Some 25 years after the writing and ratification of the charter one cannot doubt that states have used force and sought to justify it through individual or collective self-defence claims, as well as humanitarian claims in furtherance of national agendas and to increase territory. This no doubt may have been what frustrated Franck into the stance that Article 2(4) was in its grave.

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Just War Theory

Open Document