Connor Galvez
Kennedy
English 8
March 9, 2023
Did Justice Wargrave commit cold-blooded murder or was he merely carrying out justice? In the book And Then There Were None by Agatha Christie, Justice Wargrave took justice into his own hands by inviting ten people, including himself, to a remote island, in which they were disconnected from the world. Although the guests were from all different social classes they were connected by the crimes they had all committed prior to their invitation to Soldier Island. Wargrave’s plan was simple, he was to fill the gaps the law had failed to do, by sentencing all of the guests to death, for their crimes. Justice Wargrave delivered justice to these guilty individuals who were previously untouched by the
…show more content…
Blore and Vera, because they were both guilty prior to their sentencing, but lied to get out of punishment, meaning they should have been prosecuted beforehand, regardless.
Justice Wargrave’s enforced plans against Vera Claythorne are justified, because Vera is a criminal who killed an innocent child, and then lied her way out of execution. Despite Vera’s appearance as a straight-lighthearted girl, Vera was absolutely deserving of punishment, due to her criminal actions against a warm hearted boy she once looked after, Cyril Hamilton. Cyril’s uncle and Vera’s ex lover, Hugo Hamilton, was entitled to a hefty inheritance, but when Cyril was born, Cyril was entitled to the money instead. This meant that Hugo would not receive the money he needed to financially support Vera. So Vera let her greed overtake her rationalized thoughts when she was looking after Cyril one day, and encouraged Cyril to swim far out in the ocean. But instead of swimming with him like she had promised, she intentionally didn’t catch up with him, hoping he would drown so Hugo would receive the inheritance. But,”...you wouldn't think a girl like that-a nice straight jolly girl you wouldn't think she'd do that, would you? That she'd take a kid out
…show more content…
However, one cannot deny the fact that General McCarthar and Emily Brent weren’t as guilty as Vera or Mr. Blore. Before Beatrice Taylor was turned down by Emily Brent, her parents were so disgusted with her they threw her out of the house. Then,”The abandoned creature, not content with having one sin on her conscience, committed a still graver sin. She took her own life.” Although Emily Brent turned her down, her parents’ betrayal was a far greater factor for Beatrice Taylor’s suicide meaning it wasn’t entirely her fault. However, although Emily Brent and General McCarthar’s crimes were more indirect, both actions were clearly going to lead to a death. General McCarthar stated,”I sent Richmond to his death. I suppose, in a way, it was murder.” General McCarthar purposely sent Arthur Richmond on a suicide mission and intentionally killed him. Although his actions may have seemed reasonable he purposely killed an innocent man. And after his actions he never received any punishment except for the guilt he had to face knowing what he did was wrong. Arthur Richmonds guilt is not an excuse for killing a man and although he was remorseful he deserved to be punished. Emily Brent and General Macarthur's actions may have seemed reasonable but as a result their actions lead
Title Mary Surratt should have been executed. Mary Surratt was guilty because there is evidence of her supplying the criminals and having a very suspicious behavior. Mary Surratt's behavior was very weird and suspicious. Mary Surratt was not shocked at the news of Abraham's murder but when the officials visited her a second time her response was dramatically different and appeared shocked at the news. She pretended to not have heard the news which is lying and if she was innocent why would she need to lie to cops.
Sybil does not accept her guilt when turning Eva away for help. Sybil refuses to take any responsibility for the supposed death of Eva Smith. She is a strong believer that the father of her child is to take responsibility which the readers later learn is Eric; his brother. She doesn't feel guilty about refusing to give help to a pregnant woman. It is simply evident that Gerald croft is the most guilty for Eva Smith’s death.
During the entire time up till her death, Vera was almost in a trance-like state. Almost blinded by what she wanted,
The court overseeing the Lincoln assassination case sentenced any conspirator to death who was believed to have remained involved in the plot until April 14th, 1865, the date of the assassination. Mary Surratt’s meetings with John Lloyd incriminated her heavily. Lloyd’s testimony suggested Surratt had not only been aware of the plot’s true nature, but had remained an active supporter of Booth for the duration of the plot. Circumstantial and unproven evidence may have led to her sentence, but can anyone say she didn’t deserve. The court’s rule was clear, anyone who was still involved on the day of the assassination received a death sentence.
For helping Booth commit this awful crime both M. Surratt and Dr. Mudd should be held accountable for their actions. Many accomplices didn’t know they were helping Booth kill Lincoln, but they did know that they were helping him in a way such as M. Surratt. Booth had asks Mary for a favor which was to deliver a package to her tavern(pg 16). He also tells her he will stop at the tavern
Brent Bishop’s punishment is unreasonable and intolerable because his actions leads to a killing. He was convicted of manslaughter and drunk driving. Manslaughter means the crime of killing someone by accident. The situation creates a devastation for the victim’s family. Even though he has a the feeling of guilt inside him, it is not the right retribution, or a justly deserved penalty, for him.
The False Sentence For The First Woman Executed Mary Surratt shouldn’t have been executed. Her co- conspirators said she was innocent and she might have not known about how much John Wilkes Booth and his partners used her boarding house and tavern. Surratt's co-conspirators said that she had nothing to do with the plan to murder Lincoln.
No. No. There's nothing worse. Nothing worse than that. Nothing," (Bonnie, 96) Both men should be counted as equally guilty no matter who did the killing.
A moment of carelessness or bad judgment or plain stupidity carried consequences that lasted forever,” reflects Cross (O’Brien 170). Ultimately, no one can prevent death, but it is human nature to view culpability and personal responsibility wherever they fit. Throughout the war, Lieutenant Cross is also the
The U.S. government declared that Calley’s platoon murdered around 347 innocent Vietnamese villagers. Following the discovery, 14 soldiers were put on trial for their crimes but only one, Lieutenant Calley, was found guilty. Calley was charged with personally killing 22 civilians and ordering the murder of 200 civilians. He was sentenced to life imprisonment, but he ended up serving only four and a half months in prison followed by three and a half months under house arrest. Calley’s minimal sentence angered many people throughout the world and they believed it was unjust.
I’ll talk to your mother on the beach and distract her attention.” Vera Claythorne pretended to run after Cyril to save him, but instead, she watched him drown. No relationship is worth murdering anyone, especially not a pure, sinless child. Vera Claythorne’s decision to let Cyril drown led to her death and retribution. After Cyril’s death, Hugo became distant from Ms. Claythorne.
(2) A person sentenced to imprisonment to life for the crime of murder is to serve that sentence for the term of that person’s natural life. The fact that Katherine Knight was sentence to life imprisonment for the murder of John Price reflects society’s standards in that nobody should get away with taking somebody else’s life, especially in the way in which Katherine did. 6 THE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM IN ACHIEVING JUSTICE Once Katherine Knight pleaded guilty to the murder of John Price, the court was able to sentence her quite efficiently once all evidence was heard. The efficiency of this case and also the fact that Katherine Knight received the harshest penalty possible in Australia for her horrific crime shows how justice was achieved.
“Gentleman, Your Verdict”: A Moral Dilemma 1. In my opinion, I don’t think the jury should convict Commander Oram of murder because he wanted at least some people to survive and to do that, many men had to die. The fact that he commits suicide makes a difference because if he hadn’t it would have made it look like he killed 15 other men so that he could survive. If he hadn’t commit suicide, I would definitely change my answer to ‘yes, he is guilty’. I don’t think that the other crew members are guilty because they didn’t have a say in what was done.
He finds him innocent because at the end of the day, his soldiers fired, not him. Then, Daniela Calef asserts that Captain Preston is guilty, because he had one simple responsibility, his soldiers! “They breached the fundamental human right of living! Even if someone fired without order, there was enough time to stop them from the first shot, to the second. The question is, why didn’t he stop it?”
Bryan Stevenson knew the perils of injustice and inequality just as well as his clients on death row. He grew up in a poor, racially segregated area in Delaware and his great-grandparents had been slaves. While he was a law student, he had interned working for clients on death row. He realized that some people were treated unfairly in the judicial system and created the Equal Justice Institute where he began to take on prisoners sentenced to death as clients since many death row prisoners had no legal representation of any kind. In Just Mercy, Bryan Stevenson focuses on some of these true stories of injustice, mainly the case of his client, Walter McMillian.