ipl-logo

Justice In Plato's The Republic

1026 Words5 Pages

What is justice? The Republic by Plato aims to essentially this question with distinct discussions about the different components of justice. The ethic is a foundational element into the philosophical questions one encounters. Not only does the literary work aim to form a definition of justice, but also aims to prove how justice will arise. In a discussion with Glaucon, Socrates explains how he believes justice will develop. Justice will emerge when philosophers rule the just city. Socrates believes the thinkers are quintessential to the ideal city for aristocracy and continues by justifying his reasoning. He proceeds into a discussion about the regimes of injustice, comprised with a discussion about democracy. Socrates ultimately argues that …show more content…

He asserts that the just city is possible if a philosopher, with good intentions rules. Coincidently, he believes philosophers should avoid political regimes, however ruling a just city may arise such leadership. Socrates states that philosophers are able to know the truth and are essentially the uppermost of the educated. One is philosopher through education and should study the Form of Good. Socrates refutes those who falsely claim to be philosophers as they come into power once society deems the legitimate philosophers useless. Knowledge is integrated within philosophy, as it is based on facts and truthfulness. Theorists use these distinctions as a means to determine the ethics of life. Additionally, Socrates argues that philosophers are wise; they have lived a life full of complexities, and have gained the knowledge to rule a just city effectively. He asserts his view using the analogy of the cave. …show more content…

Socrates continues by describing how the regimes are considerably disparate to the just city. In general, the aristocracy will become corrupted as guardians will make mistakes in assigning individuals to classes; the root of conflicts. Socrates continues by discussing the four regimes of injustice: timocracy, oligarchy, democracy, and tyranny. Timocracy can be described as the pursuance of recognition. This regime will befall as the guardians will love wealth to the extreme that the generals become the richest. Oligarchy arises from timocracy as it is based on wealth. The government will subside as the rich will overpower the poor and the poor will revolt. Furthermore, democracy will arise from oligarchy as liberty is the central ideal. On the contrary, demagogues will compete for the power of the prime. Tyranny will arise as individuals will want to do as they please. Tyrants will compete with one another, and the government will collapse. Socrates states that democracy is essentially when, “…the poor win, killing some of the others and casting out some…” (235). Socrates explains that democracy arises when there is a divide between the rich and the poor. Socrates believes this aspect contributes to democracy being a weak government as revolts and the aim to become rich, overpower the ideal of the government. The classes are skewed and there is no balance within the city. In addition, Socrates

Show More
Related

  • Socrates Argue Of Justice In Plato's Republic

    342 Words  | 2 Pages

    the Republic, Socrates argues that justice ought to be valued both for its own sake and for the sake of its consequences (358a1–3). His interlocutors Glaucon and Adeimantus have reported a number of arguments to the effect that the value of justice lies purely in the rewards and reputation that are the usual consequence of being seen to be just, and have asked Socrates to say what justice is and to show that justice is always intrinsically better than is acting contrary to justice when doing so would win you more non-moral goods. Glaucon presents these arguments as renewing Thrasymachus’ Book 1 position that justice is “another’s good” (358b–c, cf. 343c), which Thrasymachus had associated with the claim that the rulers in any constitution frame

    Read More

  • The Role Of Alcibiades 'Justice In Socrates'

    600 Words  | 3 Pages

    To continue the argument about what is just and what is unjust, Alcibiades states that he learned what justice is from many people. Socrates then responds by saying that people rarely agree on what is just and unjust, so how is it possible to be taught by many since they all do not have the same opinions? This means that it would be impossible to learn what is just and unjust from the people in general. He needs to learn it from someone who truly knows what justice is. Socrates then says that he would be going to the Athenians and teaching them about something that he does not truly know, justice.

    Read More

  • Socrates Argument At 50a-B Of The Crito

    1118 Words  | 5 Pages

    Socrates compares the relationship between a citizen and a city to that of a child and a parent. Athens has nurtured Socrates in body and mind, given him an ideal environment to raise his own children in, to give him a platform to exhort people to be virtuous (Crito, 51a). As any child benefits from the protections and provisions of a parent, he must also obey the parent when it requires something of him. So, Socrates considers it his civic duty to obey Athens wishes since he has benefited from his citizenship. Socrates reaches a conclusion that defies a common-sense understanding of

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Plato's The Apology

    1071 Words  | 5 Pages

    Socrates provokes the ideas that the city has of him as an individual as to being a harmful human being and argues that it is not in human nature to go against his own

    Read More

  • Plato's Republic: Just Or Unjust?

    832 Words  | 4 Pages

    Plato's Republic is centered on one simple question: is it always better to be just than unjust? This is something that Socrates addresses both in terms of political communities and the individual person. Plato argues that being just is advantageous to the individual independent of any societal benefits that the individual may incur in virtue of being just. I feel as if Plato’s argument is problematic. There are not enough compelling reasons to make this argument.

    Read More

  • Private Life In Socrates's Apology

    1021 Words  | 5 Pages

    Through becoming a teacher of the young men who followed him in Athens, Socrates effectively began to enter the public life. He was able to influence others through sharing his conclusions of justice, self-examination, and piety, and by asking relentless questions. Socrates effectively showed that an individual can live a private and a public life, even if Socrates was not directly involved in the policy-making in Athens. An individual can combine these two aspects of life in a productive way allowing her/him to live a full existence. These individuals can become teachers, politicians, and activists who use their focus on justice and piety in their private lives to advocate and create laws that promote true justice for the rest of the

    Read More

  • Socrates Definitions Of Justice In Plato's The Republic

    1169 Words  | 5 Pages

    According to Socrates there are two types of justice, the political justice and the justice of a particular man. As we know, city is bigger than a man. Socrates believes that it is easier to find justice at the political level which means in the city, thus he tries to define a just city from scrap, and will see in which stage justice enters. Also, Socrates tries to find justice in the city before finding justice in the individuals because individuals are not at all self-sufficient. We humans have similar needs such as food, clothing and shelter and in order to accomplish these goals human beings form unions, where each and every individual specializes in a field.

    Read More

  • Comparing Socrates In The Apology, Crito, And The Republic

    802 Words  | 4 Pages

    Comparing Socrates words in the Republic for the philosopher to rule to the words of the Apology where philosophy is viewed as something that is punishable by death, this is where the defense or importance of philosophy is realized. For if the philosophers were the ones to rule, nobody would question whether or not what they were doing was right or wrong because the philosopher-kings make the rules through wisdom and knowledge. Plato wants to paint a portrait of the philosopher as not only something the city should want to have, but also as someone who would be fit to rule above all others. This contrasts, again, to the points made by the jurors to Socrates in the Apology for they saw Socrates as someone who brings the city

    Read More

  • Socrates And Crito Argumentative Analysis

    1382 Words  | 6 Pages

    Socrates believes that justice benefits the just, but also benefits the city (other people) too. He is faced with a seemingly simple choice, escape Athens or remain in prison and be sentenced to death. Socrates’ central argument against escaping his circumstances is twofold. First, Socrates argues that “one must never do wrong.” (49b)

    Read More

  • Argument Of Justice In Plato's Book 1 Of The Republic

    732 Words  | 3 Pages

    He uses the example of ruling a city, where a government would change the rules and laws to best suit them, and as the rules are followed by those who act justly, the just would be acting in the favour of the stronger. Socrates objects to this and claims that humans will make mistake, as that is part of being human, and may

    Read More

  • Three Acts Of The Mind: Understanding, Judgement, And Reason

    969 Words  | 4 Pages

    Philosophical thinking uses three acts of the mind: understanding, judgement, and reason. In order to have a sound argument all of the concepts must be applied. Socrates didn’t want to please the people by saying or doing what they wanted him to say or do. Socrates thought it was not important to seek wealth or fame; he was concerned with truth and virtue. He wanted to create an impact on humanity by relying on the truth and shining a light in people’s lives, even if they put him on trial.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Philosopher Kings In Plato's Republic

    708 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Plato’s Republic, the philosopher kings are arguably the most important element of Plato’s idea for a utopian society, Kallipolis Philosopher kings are the ruling class of Kallipolis, rising to power after years of intensive education in all fields of study, but specifically in philosophy and politics. These years of education and training to become philosopher kings results in a virtuous and selfless ruling class that is dedicated to protecting the happiness of the community as a whole. Philosopher kings value truth and knowledge above all else, making them free from the temptations that entice those of lesser moral character, and thus establishing the philosopher kings as the only ones who can be trusted to rule. The idea of a ruling class such as the philosopher kings gives insight as to the ideals valued by Greek society and its thoughts pertaining to leadership. Greek society placed high merit

    Read More

  • The Noble Lie In Plato's The Republic

    1355 Words  | 6 Pages

    What is justice? This is the crucial question that Plato attempts to answer in his dialogue, The Republic. He conjures up an allegory that justice can be found in a person, and a person can represent a city. Thus, his entire dialogue focuses on this ‘just’ city and the mechanics of how the city would operate. His dialogue covers a myriad of topics about justice in addition to the human soul, politics, goodness and truth.

    Read More

  • Plato Socrates Social Justice

    1467 Words  | 6 Pages

    In Plato’s Republic, Socrates and his peers attempt to define justice. Unlike the definitions that his peers give, Socrates is searching to define justice as a structure, not a set of behaviors. Socrates uses a tripartite city-soul analogy to define justice and show that it is found when there is harmony between the three parts of the city—guardians, auxiliaries, producers—mirrored to the three parts of the soul—reason, spirit, appetite. Although Socrates provides a well-structured account of justice in an attempt to demonstrate that there cannot be social justice—in the city—if people don’t first bring internal justice—in the soul—in themselves, he has a notable contradiction in his premises. In Socrates’ ideal city it is a necessary condition of an auxiliary acting in a just way that he must cause any producers who get out of hand, or

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Plato's Utopian Society

    1709 Words  | 7 Pages

    Plato, a famous ancient Greek Philosopher wrote several dialogues and although little is known about his life due to a lack of surviving records it is unanimously agreed that he was one of the most influential figures in the development of philosophy in the Western tradition. In his book, The Republic Plato writes about the ideal human society where justice prevails and there are equality and egalitarianism among the people. This society is devoid of any crimes, any injustice and is a world where one can enjoy peace and happiness without the worry or fear of oppression of any kind. Plato went on to write how such a society would be governed in the form of a hierarchy in which at the topmost position would be the “philosopher kings” who would maintain equality and ensure that every decision they make is in the best interests of society (428). Their sole purpose would be to guard the people and their perfect society in every way possible.

    Read More

More about Justice In Plato's The Republic

Open Document