ustice, fairness, and decency, abstract concepts that are innate in society and human nature. However, despite their near universal status in humanities mid, they often have different meanings for individuals. Aeschylus uses The Oresteia in order to explore these issues as characters in the play try to determine what it means to be just, what ought a just actor do, and what is the best model for achieving justice. The characters discuss ideas such as vengeance, reciprocity, balance, moderation, and finally the end result of the implied debate leads to a jury system. In this paper I will go over two of the several different interpretations of justice used in the Oresteia and compare and contrast them in order to demonstrate which is the best …show more content…
Vengeance is the model used by both the King of Mycene, in order to justify the war after his wife was taken to Troy and by Elextra to justify Orestes duty to kill his mother to avenge the death of his father. In the Libation Bearers, Elektra asks, “‘Repay those that send these honors,’ for they deserve a gift that matches their evil.” (Aeschylus 72) Later on, the chorus asks her the rhetorical question, “How could it not be right to repay your enemy, evil for evil.” (Aeschylus 74) These lines among others in the play demonstrate that the normal thing to do was to exact …show more content…
This is a model that allows people to get what they deserve, however it is lead by restraint. Restraint allows for a delay in order to deliberate and decide on a punishment that fits the crime nicely rather than being over or under sized. By allowing an outside source to view the case, the goal is that both sides points are understood and taken into account. Questions are asked such as what is enough? How far is too far? How can one know what another is deserving of. Important to the success of this model is the impartiality of the one judging. As Athena says in The Furies, “Prejudice is slander to the innocent, and justice should always be impartial.” (Aeschylus 134)
By using moderation and restraint, escalation and an endless loop of retaliation can potentially be avoided. A prominent example of this occurring in the text of the Oresteia is that of the debate and jury between Athena and the Furies. Athena stops and listens to both sides, Orestes and that of the Furies. Realizing that she would be too biased to be impartial, she assembles a Jury in the hopes that bias would be
The Oresteia is a trilogy written by the Greek author Aeschylus that comprises of three plays; Agamemnon, the libation bearers, and the Eumenides. The central theme of this book is “justice” which in the case of Orestes has led to exile. This book was written at a time when the star of Athens was in decline. It was a time that marked the establishment of a new socio- political order, a democracy adjudicated by the rule of law. This rule of law meant the institutionalization of justice (i.e. having a justice system), where cases are heard and verdicts are being reached based on evidence.
We suffer each our own shade” (VI. 186. 994-999). Through the architecture of the underworld, Virgil shows how despite living amongst the good and the bad, everyone will eventually be justly punished or rewarded in life and death. However, Virgil also calls for fair justice in the Roman courts, and in Roman society, in a very subtle way. In the Virgilian underworld, it is Minos who governs over a silent court,
The Oresteia is a political trilogy touching the topics of patriarchy and sexism. Even though, Agamemnon's death had happened years before, his essence is still evident in the hearts and minds of the people specially his children Orestes and Electra. His murder filled their minds even disregarding the fact that their father instigated the Trojan War and murdered their sister Iphigenia. Women in Ancient Greece were expected to be hung up on revenge and deception but to stay at home and take care of the family household.
Euripides, the writer of Medea and one of the most famous playwrights in ancient Greece, can be considered centuries ahead of many people in his time. His new ideas presented in many of his works were very controversial, and, as a result, unappreciated. However, most of his ideas such as equality for women’s rights and more rights for slaves correspond to our modern-day norms. In one of Euripides 's most renowned plays, Medea, the female protagonist possess characteristics that are generally found in male characters such as power, intelligence, and cunningness. The lower class characters such as the slaves and servants, who culturally are considered to be unimportant, are presented as being intelligent and also play a significant role in the drama.
When people think of a good judge they typically think of somebody who is fair, not bias and has some sort of experience. However, in today’s society, particularly in the United States, our judicial selection methods are not made to select judges on their ability to reason well and rule impartially (Carter and Burke, 6). On top of that, judges have no actual training before they become part of the judiciary. The only training they receive is in school when they are studying the law. Sometimes when they pursue an apprenticeship with a judge they also get a little bit more experience or insight into a judge’s job.
This violent depiction is the beginning of the revenge cycle the play portrays. The aforementioned event is an act of systemic violence: it is legally permitted by Rome, but the in the aftermath is catastrophic for Tamora and her family. The potential for aggression is intrinsic to Roman law, and a customary penance in the juridical capacity is by all accounts an appropriate reaction; no disagreements are taken note of. However, the caliber of legally-sanctioned violence becomes problematic when Titus executes one of his own sons for defiance.
William Shakespeare’s “Othello” was a great example to showcase sacrifices made by characters to accomplish revenge or obtain power. Shakespeare told the story of Othello, a tragic hero, who was manipulated by Iago, which motivated him to kill his own wife. From this story, Shakespeare’s main goal was to portray characters making sacrifices for their ambitions. From this play, Shakespeare puts forth the idea of sacrifice through pointing out the importance of reputation and how sacrifices must be made to silence the truth.
The theme of revenge as depicted in Homer's The Odyssey comes into play when Odysseus exacts his punishment on the wooers that invaded and denigrated his home. The revenge, in my opinion, was not only acceptable, but also, a necessity given the gravity of the situation. Although Odysseus' justice was swift and severe, this epic could not allow moderation in punishment, as it wouldn't follow the grandiosity of the story's theme. The actions of Odysseus were justified because he endured years and years of turmoil and battle.
In Aeschylus’ “Eumenides,” the Furies play a central role as ancient goddesses that punish wrongdoers. They seem to view themselves as true dispensers of justice. However, disagreements with other gods during the play proves to call their view of justice into question. In this essay, I will explore the idea that the Furies prove to be inconsistent in their dispensation of justice, which would thus invalidate them being representations of justice. However, I will counterargue that the Furies in Aeschylus' "Eumenides" represent a unique form of justice that values family loyalty and evolves through their adaptability, making them representations of consistent dispensers of justice, even in a changing world.
In the Oresteia, Aeschylus explores social patriarchy through the consistent imagery of women throughout the play. Using similar imagery Aeschylus potentially voices his disagreement with this patriarchy. The Oresteia discusses women in instances to imply the possible patriarchy of the Greeks, in the moments before Clytemnestra’s death and in the discussions of Athena the imagery of the woman is of an inferior person. However, the anger of Clytemnestra and the Eumenides themselves are in contrast to this patriarchy, as Aeschylus potentially recognizes the woman in these scenes. Divine law overrules women in many instances in The Oresteia to establish a pattern of patriarchy.
We have seen a lot of situations where innocent people are accused of something they didn’t do because of the existence of biases or a specific personal experience. So, even though this kind of thinking might be useful, it should be taken into account that it is based only on the “judge” inner feelings and thoughts. B-
The actions of the play Orestes by Euripides occurred in Argos where the last two plays have been set as well. The play starts off a few of days after Orestes had killed his mother Clytemnestra and her lover Aegisthus with the help of his sister Elektra. Elektra starts off with another one of her long monologs explaining the situation that she and her brother are in along with the fact that their uncle Menelaus has come back with his wife, Helen, who is the cause of all the strife that her family has been going through. The reader then learns that Orestes and Elektra are awaiting whether or not they will be stoned for their actions against their mother and her lover. She goes on to explain that she hopes that Menelaus can help them because
Every story that incites emotion from the reader also sparks opinions on how he or she would react in the same situation. This instigation causes the reader to sympathize or criticize the characters. A Greek play, Medea, compels the reader to do both as the main character, Medea, reveals how her grief and vengeance result in her actions seeming understandable and extreme simultaneously – making it difficult to decide whether she is morally right or wrong. The confliction within Medea’s development in the story and the challenging task of judging her actions highlight how strong emotions can make – even definite – morals appear circumstantial, and thus, cause anyone to be engrossed over satisfying their own emotional needs, while sacrificing the lives of others. After Medea’s husband, Jason, betrayed her, desiring justice for his sin is a predictable action because the natural inclination to punish those who violate what is precious, for example, the sanctity of marriage, connects all of humanity – no matter the culture or time period.
The purpose of this essay is to argue why Orestes’ situation is tragic and how does Apollo affect it. I am going to argue that Orestes’ situation is tragic because is stuck in a cycle of violence whilst being influenced by Apollo’s power. Orestes puts his faith in Apollo declaring that “Apollo will never fail me, no, his tremendous power, his oracle charges me to see this trial through.” It is not necessarily through free will that he decides to trust Apollo but through fear of what will happen to him if he chooses not to. This fear comes from the way the gods continue the cycle of violence on his household because of Zeus’ son Tantalus who was thrown out of Mount Olympus for feeding his children to the gods.
…justice is done upon him… he has paid… with death.” (Aeschylus 47). This shows the magnitude of anguish inflicted by Agamemnon’s betrayals and how that motivated