Justice In To Kill A Mockingbird

637 Words3 Pages
Harper Lee expressed the controversial side to the idea of justice in her award winning novel To Kill a Mockingbird. Justice is a complex subject to examine. Each person has their own interpretation of what justice is. This is due to the fact that justice is situational. This novel clearly exemplifies a message of standing up for what is lawful. However, it is tremendously difficult to form a rebuttal against the actions of some characters in this novel. Justice does not always deal with the government or law enforcement. Justice can take place in areas like classrooms, places of worship, or in the comforts of your own home. The issue with justice being served outside of the court room is whether it was necessary or proper. Imagine a situation where someone…show more content…
Even though jurors are supposed to be non-biased, their feelings about a situation can alter their opinion. Bob Ewell was not the only person upset with Atticus for defending a black man as well. Many of the jurors were simply just racist towards African Americans. This is one of the sole reasons why there are flaws in the justice system. Many African Americans have been wrongfully accused of a crime they did not commit due to racist jurors. Boo Radley did not need to explain his actions in the court of law. He was simply saving the lives of two innocent children. I do not believe he deserved some type of sentencing due to the face that he was defending others. Sometimes you have to act outside of the law to guarantee that justice is served. Boo Bradley did become a hero for Jem and Scout. Scout even became more friendly towards Boo Radley after she realized that he was not a wicked man after all. This novel exemplifies how people can have unfair trials due to their ethnicity or religion. The situation almost seems as if the jurors have decided on the outcome of the case before they even enter the
Open Document