Justified Declaration Of Independence Essay

626 Words3 Pages
The colonists were justified declaring independence. Ignoring their every plead, speech, letter, King George III didn’t always treat the colonists fair, thus forcing them to live in absolute tyranny. The colonists dealt with numerous hardships accompanied by Great Britain. They decided to turn the other cheek, to walk the dirt path into a new future of independence and liberty. To begin with a vital event with King George III and patriots, taxation without representation. “He taxes us without permission,” briefly stated in the paraphrased declaration of independence. 1764, the British parliament passed down a new law which was truthfully an amended variant of the sugar and molasses act of 1733, that of which was about to go past it’s expiration date. The Sugar Act was intended to finance the defence of the colonies, it was one of the first tangible signs of Britain’s intent to gain tighter control over colonial trade. These measures led to widespread…show more content…
The boycott decreased British trade. These principals caused a lot of rage with the patriots. 1765, The Quartering Act. The quartering act was the act of providing British troops with many needs. Often colonists had to house to 8 British redcoats. They supplied the troops with food, bed, shelter, etc. These redcoats became a burden upon colonists and their taxes; and the colonists became very angry. 1770, The Boston Massacre. A group of soldiers, guards a home when a group of colonists began harassing them; one redcoat hit with a snowball’s full impact sent bullets flying and killed 5 patriots. Morally the event wasn’t entirely the redcoat’s fault. Colonists were attacking them with rocks, snowballs, clubs. It was simply an act of self-defense for the troops. Paul Revere engraved a depiction of the Boston massacre, as to his perfect point of view, this illustrated the redcoats to be wrathful and
Open Document