Juvenile Court Case Study

There are many different statistics that show different percentages of juveniles being tried as adults. Many people would say that we should be protecting the children and not taking out vengeance on them and they are too young to take on such a weighty legal responsibility. If the child is old enough to commit the crime, then they should be punished for it. Several reasons explain why they should be tried like they will understand the

Juveniles don’t even have a fully developed brain and as a result, can’t fully understand the circumstances that they find themselves in. Courts must not be given the power to try and sentence juveniles as adults because the environment in adult prisons are for adults, not juveniles, therefore, Proposition 21 should be repealed. When a juvenile enters an adult court, they are looked at no longer as an adolescent, but as an adult. However, they are not adults. Juveniles are actually far from it, not just physically, but mentally as well.

The ways that they are treated and how they receive no help is ashame because that is not how people should be treated no matter where they are. It is understandable that they have not followed the laws that were given, but they should not be bashed; they should be talked to and given help. A good program that should be put in place is a program that would help increase their life and educational skills that they have to attend after they get out of juvenile for a certain period of

However, adults gradually came to the consensus that children do not act similarly to adults and the reasoning behind their actions are not similar to those of adults and therefore should be treated differently than adults, including punishments for law-breaking. Juveniles today have a separate court system that places the emphasis on correcting the behavior rather than punishing the individual.

The Supreme Court specifically held that the Eighth Amendment is inapplicable to discipline imposed in the schools.” “The prisoner and the school child stand in wholly different circumstances, separated by the harsh facts of criminal conviction and incarceration.... The school-child has little need for the protection of the Eighth Amendment.” (“DICKENS BY DICKENS v. JOHNSON COUNTY BD. OF EDUC. (n.d.)”) 4. Holding: The ruling of the

In “Juvenile Mediation Cuts Repeat Offenses”, associate Professor Donna Decker at the University of New Haven contends that if a juvenile faces the consequences of their actions, they are less likely to commit another crime. She stated that the juveniles did not realize that their actions could result in consequences thus making it much easier to commit crimes. In an effort to support this statement, Morris conducted a study on the juvenile offenders in Bridgeport. “She utilized the results from mediations conducted by the Dispute Settlement Center between 2005 and 2006” (Cuda, 2010). The program which started in the year 2005 allows juvenile offenders to get their case dropped, but they must face the consequences of their actions by engaging in conversation with the victim.

Does mental health cause or explain why a juvenile committed a crime? There is no way to determine if criminal involvement is directly linked with mental illnesses. Mental illnesses are different for every individual. Juveniles with mental illnesses are not at an increased risk for criminal involvement; it’s just associated with some juveniles. Demographics had no deciding factor if juveniles would be re-incarcerated for crimes in their adulthood life.

By understanding that these factors often play off each other in the development of a deviant juvenile, one can try to implement system practices to combat this. Such as having a mentoring program with community leaders or officials from youth centers to help juveniles who exit the system, leave on their feet with connections to change their future. The research denotes many ways to address these issues, and the fact that any juvenile within the system can be experiencing anyone of these or multiple at once. Once one understands that their behavior stems from these issues, a plan can be developed to eliminate the causes of deviant behavior and to lower the risk of

One of the negative effects that restrive housing is “The potential psychological harm and impairment in social functioning that arises from the social isolation of restrictive housing potentially undermines the core rehabilitative component of criminal justice” (Correction.com). One factor restrive housing has on juveniles is the brain is still developing, and it 's crucial for youths to socially interact with others. Youths being isolated from the rest of society which means youths aren 't self regulating their emotions by interacting with the rest and learning their norms. Isolating the juveniles might increase the chance of self harm but also may be labeling them as a “bad kid”. Labeling offenders can make it more difficult in trying to change their negative

Every now and then, adolescents move off the straight and narrow path of prosperity; leading them to run against the law instead of with it. It is important to help these children get back on the right track, and start moving towards a more productive life. This is the main goal of juvenile probation in the United States. The juvenile probation system has developed with the evolution of the juvenile justice and court system in America; as a way to separate young lawbreakers from adult criminals. As some sort of feedback to the harshness of the criminal law system during the 1800s was the effort to keep young lawbreakers out of institutions.

In terms of police interrogations, juveniles don’t have many rights. In terms of the constitutional protection, juveniles are protected by, 14th amendments test for voluntariness of confession under the totality of circumstances clause, the sixth amendments right to counsel, and the fifth amendments privilege against self-incrimination. In cases such as Haley v. Ohio and Gallegos v. Colorado, the courts decided that ones age, the time of the questioning, and the absence of a legal parent/guardian or a lawyer without waiver of these rights results in confessions that are involuntary and unconstitutional. Those are just some of the rights given to juveniles though. These rights don’t nearly compare to those rights in adult courts, but unlike

§ 5037). The Federal Bureau of Prisons does not have its own facilities to house juvenile delinquents and must house juveniles in a state court. If a juvenile is arrested, they must be brought in front of a magistrate immediately or within a

CUSTODY AGREEMENT Richards vs. Edwards 1. Under no kind of circumstances should any of Eran Gregory Edwards, date of birth 7/15/1980 girlfriends such as; Jessica Janette Parish Fine, date of birth 09/25/1986, be allowed anywhere at any time around Addilyn Grace Edwards, date of birth 02/25/2015, due to the following; Criminal records, Ignition Interlock Device, violence, and drug use. 2. Under no circumstances should Addilyn Grace Edwards be able to stay at any time with Eran Gregory Edwards without supervision including visitation and overnight, due to the following; Jessica Janette Parish Fine, Criminal records, Ignition Interlock Device, anger issues, alcohol and drug use. 3.

If one takes a closer look at the ordinance that the city of Renton enacted in April, 1981, it prohibited any Adult motion picture theater from being located within 1,000 ft. of any residential zone, single- or multiple-family dwelling, church, or park, and within one mile of any school. “The court found that the Renton ordinance did not substantially restrict First Amendment interests…the purposes of the ordinance were unrelated to the suppression of speech, and that the restrictions on speech imposed by the ordinance were no greater than necessary to further the governmental interests involved” (1986, p.475). Overall, the city of Renton enacted this ordinance to protect the secondary affects that Adult film theaters can have on a community, not to purposely restrict sexual content for the viewing of the

Furthermore, this leaves room for states to implement their own practices and ways to address status offenders. It has also been argued that the Act “fractured the juvenile justice system so that officials in the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare handled white, middle-income youth” (Hinton, 2015, p. 816). Programs which labeled white youths as “children in trouble” marked minority youths as “chronic offenders” who were deemed a danger to society, and tried as an adult. The exceptions and revisions that have been made to the Act make it possible for repeat status offenders to be detained in secure