Haveripet conducted a study in the Indian setting to study juvenile delinquency with focus on its causes and consequences. The study titled “Causes and consequences of juvenile delinquency in India” published in 2013 was conducted in using a social survey method using purposive sampling. The identified causes of delinquency are divided into 4 categories. Individual factors are lack of education, low impulse control, aggression, etc. Parenting variables are: parental conflict, abuse, and neglect. Parents who offend or show lack of respect for the law may have children who are prone to criminal activity. Mental health factors include personality disorders, conduct disorder, etc. Substance abuse is an important factor and is more likely to cause …show more content…
The study titled “Criminal careers and cognitive scripts: An investigation into criminal versatility” looks into specialisms and flexibility which criminals develop while engaging in criminal activity. It looks at the internal or cognitive processes involved in choosing the activity as a “career”, and the kind of crime rather than skills deficit as a cause. The study uses script theory (Schank and Abelson, 1977) to understand the minds of criminals. The script theory states that memory of events is encoded episodically, and for retention, things must be related to personal experiences in some way. The kinds of scripts are: internal scripts that guide behaviour, situational scripts that are to do with knowledge of everyday events, and personal scripts that are goal directed sequences of actions. 10 male offenders who fit the criteria of criminal offender were recruited (convicted on at the least two occasions). They were aged between 18 and 26 years. A semi-structured, written interview was used to obtain data. Subjects were initially unaware of the objective of the study but were debriefed after the study. Thematic analysis was used to analyse data. It was found that repeated offenders may have situational scripts for hypothetical criminal situations. However, they generally operate from personal scripts (sequences of goal directed behaviour), that may themselves change for more …show more content…
It shows that, if implemented properly, the program can provide psychological and direct benefits to delinquents. The most important consideration here is that an assessment should be conducted, which will give a comprehensive picture regarding the factors and influences, and the life script assessment. Other studies too have shown the importance of studying the life of the offenders with attention to the social and cultural aspects of their life rather than only focussing on individual factors alone, which if studied in isolation, would not be as useful. Some have advocated for the use of more individualistic treatment after assessment rather than a common programme (Cullen and Gendreau,
Beyond Scared Straight is a television show that is a documentary about youth that complete the program because of juvenile delinquency. The closure of information to public view is limiting due the nature of the television series. As a way to conduct the research, Beyond Scared Straight will be the independent variable. Its focus is more to stress the morbidly devastating difficulties that await the youths provided they continue their actions as opposed to a readily available source for research. The dependent variable of recidivism is rather complex to measure due to limited follow up following two to three months.
Developmental theories look at how offenders start and end their criminal behaviors. All developmental theories, including the two focused on in this paper, pull from social, psychological, and biological factors to find answers. Both of these theories follow along a trajectory or pathway for offenders. Sampson and Laub’s age-graded theory has offenders following along two possible trajectories. They can either follow along the high risk trajectory or the low risk trajectory.
My paper aims to discuss the three different factors of criminal behaviour, what causes it and why. My essay will examine and focus mainly on the genetic makeup of a person, the environment in which they are raised in and gender differences.
Another study, conducted in austional, where the juvenile conviction rate was very high, demonstrated how supervision skills work within youth probation programs. The view that this research proposed is the “Good Lives Model” (Ward, 2010); This model focuses on client strengths, on enhancing their opportunities to achieve the goals of a good life (such as employment and social relationships), and on developing holistic plans for change. This model is critical of the focus that the RNR model has on risk factors, and instead it emphasizes the importance of therapeutic alliance and of enhancing opportunities for offenders to achieve the goals associated with a good life (Trotter& Evans, 2009). By focusing on their goals and strengths and how they act in social settings, the Good Lives Model allows officers to help their clients have better chances of preventing recidivism. For these reasons, I believe this is a great
This theory clearly rules out the effect of inherited or innate factors, and the last is the cognitive theory, which is based on how the perception of an individual is manifested into affecting his or her potential and capability to commit a crime. (Psychological theories of crime) Relating these theories to the case under study, it’s clear that the behaviour can be traced most times to faulty relationships in the family during the first years of
In family structure, high parenting stress cause children’s problematic behavior especially in single parent. If the child has a high sense of school belonging, the child is likely to participate in delinquent behavior. The passage points out important areas to improve family structure and school belonging. Merino, N. (2010). Juvenile Crime.
Throughout the years, there have been several theories developed, in the field of criminology, seeking to explain crime and delinquency. Criminology is constantly evolving due to the political and economic views of society. Throughout this change,many theories were created, while other theories are proven to no longer be valid. Each theory whether valid or invalid, takes a different approach in its explanation of crime and delinquency. The question that many have tried to answer is, which theory has the most empirical validity and can best explain why individuals choose to engage in delinquent and criminal activity?
The responsivity principle states that clinicians should tailor treatment delivery that will produce the most effective outcomes depending on unique needs of the client. It is important that the therapist considers each offender individually and adequately assesses their cultural, mental, and physical needs. There are several advantages (pros) and a couple disadvantages (cons) to the therapeutic approach of the RNR model. The pros of this model are that treatment intensity is matched with individual risk level, dynamic issues that are directly linked with crime, and that specific treatment is tailored to individual offenders. By matching treatment intensity to risk level, offenders receive treatment that will be most effective in meeting their therapy needs.
As we have discussed I have done some research on ways to prevent recidivism among our medium to high risk offenders and whether it would be beneficial for Community Corrections departments to implement evidence-based programs in the case management of these offenders. To obtain data for this report I referred to government and professional publications; I also conducted various interviews with individuals who are knowledgeable of these practices. This report addresses whether certain programs used in community corrections are an effective practice for the medium to high risk criminal population. I am going to provide three different programs and their costs that could be implemented in community based corrections.
The perspective of criminal behaviour (Andrews & Bonta, 2006) fundamentally reflects a personality predisposition and the learning of criminal behaviour governed by the expectations an individual holds and the actual consequences to his or her behaviour. General personality functions as criminogenic needs (e.g., impulsivity) and responsivity factors (e.g., need for excitement). Cognitive aspects focus on self-regulation in shaping procriminal attitudes, whereas social learning discusses the learning influence within the proximal social circles. On the other hand, GLM is driven by the strength-based rehabilitation theory. Human are by nature, active, goal seeking beings who are consistently engaged in the process of constructing a sense of purpose and meaning in their lives (Ward & & Brown, 2004).
Andrews and Bonta (1994) have given a list of factors that may increase recidivism rates. Firstly, offenders may lack the skills required for holding a job and therefore have to resort to crime to support themselves. Secondly, many of them are school dropouts. They therefore lack the social skills that are learnt in schools such as conflict resolution, empathy, and team building. Thirdly, they often belong to dysfunctional families where they do not get much
Furthermore, the psychology of criminal behavior, psychology, and criminology all have a primary objective of achieving an understanding of the variation in the criminal behavior of individuals (Andrews and Bonta , 2010). Empirically, the study of variation in criminal behavior is done by the studying of covariates (Andrews and Bonta , 2010). The primary covariates that PCC studies are biological, social, and psychological (Andrews and Bonta , 2010). Although, criminology tends to assess criminality at an aggregate level, in comparison to the psychology of criminal conduct’s focus on an individual level. Additionally, a psychology of criminal conduct involves applying what is learned by the studying of psychological information and methods to the predicting and influencing the propensity of criminal behavior on an individual
The theory views the offender as either a patient or a victim or both. According to this theory a person who has committed an offense is not morally responsible for the offense he or she has committed because the offense might be the product of an illness in which treatment is required; this type of person is regarded as a patient. When the offense is the product of a dysfunctional social environment the person is regarded as the victim. The advantage of this approach is that it focuses on the offenders, instead of punishing the offenders this approach focuses on repairing and treating the dysfunctional areas that the offenders are experiencing by means of behavioral therapy and other therapeutic programmes.
We all know that parents, since the child is born, are always by their child’s side since they share a same home and should be the one to monitor their children while he or she is growing up. David P. Farrington (Farrington, n.d) stated that family factor, poor parental child-rearing methods especially lack of guidance and control from parents, is the most common answer when people are asked about the main cause of crimes. Moreover, according to Lieb Roxanne (1994), family components can predict an early sign of delinquency. Some weak way of predictions are based on the socioeconomic status of the family, and the less affection of the child to parents. However, the lack of guidance and letting the child to feel being unwanted is a strong predictor or root of
Juvenile Delinquency is a phenomenon that affects communities worldwide according to media reports, both print and electronic, where worrying images of youths involved in behavior outside societal norm has been highlighted. This issue has been studied by researchers locally, regionally and internationally where results has shown that delinquency has been influenced by a number of factors such as age, gender, race, family circle, environment, socioeconomic status et cetera. This research paper attempts to examine Juvenile delinquency and the effects of social structure on form (III) three students attending secondary schools in Trinidad. A structural functionalist perspective will be used based on factors that influence delinquency such as Poverty, Ideology of hegemony, and discrimination.