When looking through the history of Juvenile Justice there is a lot of trial and error. Especially since it pertains to juveniles, and the criminal justice system. Kids were starting to cause trouble and strife, which left the justice system wondering where they should be placed. The first family court to take place was in Chicago, Illinois in 1899. This is the first happenings of a juvenile court system. The reason why this was happening was because of the violence going on among juveniles. Juveniles were becoming extremely violent, and aggressive. The goal among this first court and the rest of the juvenile justice from then on was to deter juvenile delinquents. One of the way of doing this through the juvenile court was to have a due process …show more content…
This established that children are responsible for their actions against the law. Of course most children were not severely punished as an adult would be. If something got stolen they may get flogged instead of getting a capital offense. The only children totally spared against capital punishment were those who were impaired. In addition, from the Roman and common law came the common law in the 11th and 12th century. Children who were over the age of 14 were considered adults, and were to be punished as so. From this came the form of the word of mens rea also known as “guilty mind” which is how the Juvenile Justice continue their proceedings today. Furthermore, the next important stage in history was during the 15 century with the King of England. It was knowns as chancery courts which literally means to help or intervene in a situation of death, abandonment, abuse, etc. This also lead to the king having parens patria which stands for “parents of the country.” In return this also means that the king would take the place of the parents. Another important time in history for juveniles was when they had the Hospital of St. Michael’s as a treatment for juvenile
The matter by which juveniles are processed and handled in the criminal justice system vary on the model and philosophy being used in the proceedings itself. If Parens Patriae, or the Treatment Model was being used, The state would deal with juveniles differently than it would adult offenders, in a much more gentle and caring way, which would be considered informal and flexible. The judge would act in a very calm and caring manner, and would attempt to probe the roots of the child's difficulties. The Treatment Model views child delinquency as some sort of underlying personality problem.
Introduction In response to question one of unit 4, I will discuss the facts, issues, as well as court holdings referencing the Roper v. Simmons case of 2005. Discussion The Roper v. Simmons case is noted for being one of the most significant cases in the history of the juvenile court system as it abolished capital punishment for offenders under the age of eighteen in the United States (Death Penalty Information Center, n.d.). This case was argued on October 13, 2004, and a decision was reached by the United States Supreme Court on March 1, 2005. The case referenced the sentencing of Christopher Simmons to death for a crime he committed at the age of seventeen (Cornell University Law School, n.d.).
The records of the Chicago’s Women’s Club show that in 1891 Mrs. Perry Smith, a member of the CWC recommended the creation of a juvenile court so that children “might be saved from contamination of association with older criminals” (Platt, 2009, p. 128). Furthermore, other members of the CWC persuaded Judge Richard Tuthill to hold a separate court for children on Saturday mornings (Platt, 2009). The CWC assigned a representative to this special court who acted in the capacity of probation officer and adviser to the judge. Judge Tuthill was later quoted in the Annals of the Chicago Women’s Club as saying about the CWC that: The work of this noble organization was initial, persistent and effective.
This is seen in the concepts of, age of criminal responsibility, the rights of young offenders when questioned or arrested, the procedures and penalties for children
Before the Progressive movement, child labor conditions were terrible and child crime rates were soaring. The Progressive movement, notably through the women, fought to end child labor and succeeded in getting new policies passed to protect children in the workplace. The Progressive movement also called attention to the issue of child crime rates. Source 3, a Harvard Law review on “The Juvenile Court”, comes to the defense of juvenile delinquents and argues for reforming over punishment, and focusing on turning them into worthy citizens rather than criminals. This led to changes taking place in the way juveniles were dealt with by the government.
The start to such severe punishment for minors began with what is referred to as the “summer of violence” which took place in Denver, Colorado in 1993. During the summer of ’93, seventy four people were killed in Denver, due to an increase in violence caused by minors. In order to try to gain control of the situation and to put fear into the minors in order to keep them from committing such crimes the governor at the time requested a special session in order to try to change the laws about how minors could be processed after committing a crime. As a result of said special session 11 laws were passed. One of which gave prosecutors the right to file charges against minors between the ages of 14 and 17 (Gardner, 2011).
The court wants to follow the amendments. Another important thing I got from this database was the nations included that all previously employed the death penalty to juveniles. This answered another one of my questions. I used this database because it has believable information and it also has a proper MLA
The origins of child protection can be the late 1800s, when the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children was established in the city of New York. This was at the onset of an incidence in which the treatment of a young child captured the attention of the public in 1875, resulted in the formation of this organization to fight for the rights of the children in the state of New York (Horwath, 2007). Subsequently, other states in the U.S. followed suit, with the notable creation of the very first juvenile court in 1899 to address issues relating to delinquency, neglect and dependence in the state of Chicago (CWLA, 2012). Throughout the subsequent decades, other federal and state regulations and laws were drafted to encompass the protection
Annotated bibliography Childress, S. (2016, June 2). More States Consider Raising the Age for Juvenile Crime. Retrieved from PBS: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/more-states-consider-raising-the-age-for-juvenile-crime/ More states are considering to raising the age for juvenile crimes before being tried as adult because young offender's mental capacity. The idea is to cut the cost of incarcerate young offender in adult prison and ensure offenders to receive proper education and specialized care to change their behavior. Putting children in adult prison does not deter crime.
The case made an impact on the treatment of juveniles today because juveniles now have four basic constitutional rights when they are to be
Crime and Punishment in the Medieval Period The Middle Ages or Medieval Period lasted from 476 CE to the 1453 CE. It began with the fall of the Roman Empire and merged into the Renaissance and the Age of Discovery. The Middle Ages is divided into three main periods, the Dark Ages, the High Middle Ages and the Late Middle Ages. To a significant extent the nature of crime and punishment, it was very different between social classes during the Medieval Period. This can be seen through the significant groups that were involved in medieval crime and punishment, the effects of a person’s social class on crime and punishment and the punishments given out to different social classes between the Medieval Period and today.
There are many children in the world who are being put behind bars and detained for alleged wrongdoing without protections they are entitled to. Throughout the world, children are charged and sentenced for actions that should not be considered as adult crimes. Here in the United States, the minimum age of criminal responsibility is age 12. Law enforcement officials and those in the juvenile justice system nationwide tend to mistreat underage individuals by trying cases while working through the lens of an adult. Unfair punishments are still handed down domestically, which is in violation of Supreme Court law.
There have been many times over the years where a child commits a crime and they either get the punishment of a child or they get the punishment of an adult depending on their age, or depending on what the crime they committed was. If you send a child to adult prison it is a lot more harsh than juve so they have to be kept from the other inmates because it is too dangerous for them to be around them. The children transferred to criminal court were less likely to commit the same crime than those who went through the juvenile system. The children who re offended offended sooner and more often than the children who were tried in the juvenile court. In some states if the child is convicted in criminal court they can plead insanity and get out of the of the sentence they would be facing.
Moreover, the books are good for the people who have an interest in the juvenile judicial system and should act as an eye-opener to the people. Ethics and policy also interacted in the book on several occasions as the paper evaluated the policies from an ethical
Many children were being sentenced to death row or to die in prison for non-homicidal crimes. This developed because the government did not see what the difference between a child and an adult committing the same crime. Before a decade ago the United States did not have a set age for which a child could be trial as an adult. They finally passed a law saying that no child shall either be sentenced to death row or die in prison. Cruel and unusual punishments developed for the minorities because instead of a black man committing a crime and getting lynched, this was the governments way of saying they could make sure they were executed and punished for the crime.