Juveniles Deserve Life Sentences Analysis

Things change: people change. Every bad situation in this life comes around to haunt one another in a manner of injustice. In many cases juveniles have been treated in a cruel way due to their actions. Young teens contribute to poor behavior when growing up, since they are mostly not aware of the consequences in a negligent situation a numerous amount of them tend to behave in an unusual way. Considering the fact that every teen grows in a different environment, it is unfair for all teenagers to have the same sentence when they commit crimes. I believe that a life without parole sentence for teenagers who commit first or second degree murders is unfair because a teenage brain is not fully developed until the age of twenty five, teenagers make impetuous decisions without considering long term effects, and teens do not have the rights of adults, so they should not be punished as an adult.

Many teenage brains are not fully developed until the age of twenty five. In the article “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains”, the author Paul

In the article, “Juveniles Don't Deserve Life Sentences”, the author Gail Garinger states, “ Young people are biologically different from adults”(1). Inevitably, an adult is further capable of a freely experience about life structure than a teen who needs guidance for the right path. Garinger also says, “ Juvenile offenders cannot with reliability be classifried among the worst offenders”(1). Since teens do not know the right or wrong path society should not see them as criminals but as kids who made the wrong choices without understanding their actions. In the article “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains”, Paul Thompson says, “A child is not a man”(1). All teens who have committed a crime should not receive a death penalty or a adult sentencing. Teenagers do not have the capability powers as an adult because they are much more superior than a simple