In the fiction books Brave New World and 1984, authors Aldous Huxley and George Orwell, respectively, write about potential dystopias in the future. Although they both envision eventual dystopias, the juxtaposition of the two novels shows that they are for different reasons. For example, while the society in 1984 is run by fear and punishment, Brave New World is run by false happiness. Oppositions in themes such as sex, technology, and indifference between the book are apparent, and in my opinion, I would rather live in Brave New World due to its more positive approach. Of the many shared themes tackled by both authors, views on sex are among the most differing. In Brave New World, sex is promoted because people enjoy the act, which is shown when Fanny, upon hearing that Lenina is only talking to two men, tells Lenina “you ought to be more promiscuous” (43). Whereas sex is promoted in this brave new world, the leaders of the society in 1984 are trying to eradicate …show more content…
In Huxley’s society, whenever someone is unable or unwilling to abide by the society’s principles, they are sent to one of many islands, to live with others who want to live life differently (227). When Bernard Marx and Helmholtz Watson ordered to be sent to an island for their differences, state controller Mustapha Mond still attempts to be accommodating when he asks Helmholtz, “By the way, would you like a tropical climate?” (229). Additionally, Mond states that being sent to an island is really a reward, because they will now live with people who are similar. On the other hand, in Orwell’s 1984, those who are different are tortured until they are corrected. For example, when torturing Winston for his thoughtcrime, O’Brien states, “you are a flaw in the pattern, Winston. You are a stain that must be wiped out” (255). The accommodation and acceptance in Brave New World is much more desirable than the torture approach used in Orwell’s
Contemporary social critic Neil Postman makes plenty of great comparisons between George Orwell and Aldous Huxley 's vision of what’s to come in the future. While both authors make compelling arguments backed by great sources, one person’s opinion is definitely more relevant than the others. Postman’s assertion about which authors vision is more relevant is undeniably understandable in terms of why he could find a way to relate these ideas to our society today, however, the amount of relevance between Orwell 's vision and current worldly problems is simply incontestable. Orwell envisioned many scary situations in the novel “1984”. The idea that books could be banned and people may be deprived of relevant information isn’t as far off from
Conclusion In Chapter 5 of Brave New World, Bernard and Lenina have meaningless sex under the influence of drugs. These events demonstrate Huxley’s depiction of the degrading society that he saw in the Roaring Twenties when he visited the promiscuous United States. By magnifying these concerns in his utopian society, he allows the reader to question the direction of the real world’s values. Bernard acts as Huxley’s voice of reason, he does not believe that someone should take drugs yet he does it to fit in with those around him.
During the early 20th century, the world was caught in a great political and social upheaval with the establishment of communism and fascism in Europe. This new ideology, coupled with the start of the Second World War, sent the world in distress. George Orwell an Aldous Huxley both began to create different worlds in their respective books, 1984 and Brave New World, which embodied their vision of what a future society might look like after the conclusion of the war. Key to both of these new societies is the development of advanced technologies that can be used to control the population, brainwash the children, demonstrate power, and manipulate the past. Central to both societies is the development of technology to control the population.
The director makes the argument that unorthodox behavior is worse than murder to portray that unorthodoxy threatens more than the life of one person. Unorthodoxy is so dangerous for the reason that it threatens the whole society, it strikes at society itself (pg.148). D.C.H dislikes Bernard for Bernards heretical views on soma and sport, unorthodox sex life, and refusal to obey teaching of Ford. To humiliate Bernard D.C.H exposes Bernard. For instance, he states, “ this man who stands before you hear, this Alpha-Plus to whom so much has been given, and from whom, in consequence so much must be expected, this colleague of yours or should I anticipate and say this ex colleague?
Why Our Society is Closer to the World State In the novel Brave New world, Aldous Huxley introduces the world to a dystopian future where people are willingly controlled by the government. Brave New World implies that by giving the people easy access to carnal pleasures e.g sex, and drugs the populace becomes complacent and they will do whatever is asked of them giving into the fear that the things that make them feel good will be taken away. Our society in 2017 is closer to the world state in Brave New World because of the mindless ‘feel good’ media that is present, tendency for casual sex and the increased use of recreational drugs. People in the world state are fully conditioned to not feel emotions such as anger, sadness, or loneliness, only to be euphoric and happy.
In the novels, Brave New World and 1984, the authors take the positive social aspects and values of community, identity, and stability and corrupt them into a dystopian society. While both books may come as a shock to the system, seeing as they both focus on aspects we are to scared to admit could possibly happen and seem wildly different at points, there are a lot of similarities between the two. Aldous Huxley’s novel is set in a world where the society is kept very carefully balanced: “The World State’s motto, COMMUNITY, IDENTITY, STABILITY.” (Huxley 1). For example, the means of reproduction is just as closely monitored and controlled as production is.
O’Brien’s use of starvation, the electric chair, and mental bullying serves as a crucial motivator for intelligent, problem causing citizens such as Winston to confess and repent willingly eventually. Finally, the use of cruelty by Big Brother reveals the inner and destructive conscience of the party in order to ensure that society is orderly and continually worshipping Big Brother. The suffering and eventual destruction of citizens such as Winston reveals that a free-thinking society is still intact, however, any government’s use of torture could and did destroy the will of a majority of those that were so horribly imprisoned in Nazi concentration camps across Europe. Therefore, the cruelty used throughout the novel “1984” functions in the work as an effective scare tactic that is able to exterminate an entire society while simultaneously creating a new master race that is intellectually void and completely subservient to Big
“WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH”; it is the slogan of the Party, in 1984, and it is the best irony can be found, all through this novel and We. As describes many ironies of two novels above, it can be said that, with the help of “irony”, the authors hide a utopia, under the mask of dystopia; so, it is the duty of a reader to perceive it, with a great concentration, otherwise, the Party’s motto is true[!]. So, if irony, as a literary device, did not exist, Orwell and Zamyatin never can demonstrate their surreptitious utopian city. The Orwellian World in both novels, is not a prediction of a dystopic future, but it is a satirical account of the totalitarian systems of fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, and the Communist
Huxley’s wording presents the standard of women in this dystopian world setting. Further shows that most women were there to pleasure. In Brave New World, Huxley’s captivating syntax and imagery forges unforgettable
Complicated notions of people and politics become apparent through the representations of divergent viewpoints. Aldous Huxley’s 1932 science-fiction novel, ‘Brave New World’, and Pablo Picasso’s 1951 expressionist painting, ‘Massacre in Korea’ showcase differing political perspectives through composers addressing issues about the future wellbeing of the human race through the interpretations of the current world events in the 20th century. Huxley criticizes the social planning evident in communism, Freud, eugenics and the development of technology, while Picasso shows his disapproval of the America’s involvement in the Korean War. These events allow the composers to be obligated to display their concerns about possible outcomes that lead the
In the novel Brave New World, author Aldous Huxley links sexual promiscuity and happiness by utilizing diction and imagery, proving that the only link sexual promiscuity has towards happiness is that it promotes a false sense of happiness. In the “New World Society”, where the main characters Lenina and Bernard Marx are from, everything is controlled and created to fit the social ecosystem of their “perfect” society. Even the people are created, from vials. Not born or produced.
“It is impossible for a male author to accurately present a strong female character”: Using ideas from the critical anthology to inform your argument, to what extent do you agree with this view in relation to George Orwell’s “1984”: FEMINISM In text “1984”, there are several male perspectives in which women are presented to the reader, through Orwell the author and Orwell the narrator. Orwell employs an omniscient, limited narrator, which therefore means, as an audience, we experience the novel through a predominately male perspective. Due to the masculine lens, through which the reader experiences the female characters and the symbols they represent, the way we perceive them as constructs can on first glance, be a mouthpiece for Orwell’s values.
Both Orwell’s 1984 and Zamyatin ’s We are dystopian novels expressing the fear of totalitarian governments and the lives of the citizens in these countries. Both of these novels express a similar theme. For example, both novels are set in an unpleasant totalitarian society in which the citizens are constantly being repressed and in both novels an unsuccessful attempt to rebel against the government exists.
What is dystopia like in the novel 1984 and how does language in particular influence dystopia? Dystopia, defined as the “not good place” was born by an artists’ curiosity for Utopian thinking. Author George Orwell was inspired by Soviet writer Yevgeny Zamyatian’s novel, ‘We’ and wrote many books including 1984 and Animal Farm. ‘1984’ directly criticized totalitarianism, media and language, describing our future in a extremely dark and depressing atmosphere.
“Sex sells,” has been used as an excuse to exploit men and women through advertising for years. Since “sex sells,” is a common phrase that turns out to be very truthful, in Aldous Huxley’s novel Brave New World, similarly, “sex sells,” is the heart of the World State’s control. Huxley uses sex to convey his theme that if used correctly an individual can instinctively control people. As one reads Brave New World, the reader will see two worlds, which has distinctive differences in the act of sex and morals.