ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay: Why Humans Are Animals Mentally?

808 Words4 Pages

As the question consist of an analogical argument, so, I will divide this essay into three parts. I am going to define is that human are animals first, describe the rights we have and then using the Kant’s anthropocentric views, Peter Singer’s specialism, Tom Regan’s views on animal right and some examples, to give a full picture in order to support my stance. In my opinions, I strongly agree that all human are animals, but, there are some differences between the human and animals mentally. Thus, I agree with the statement of “animals also have rights”. However, some of the rights we have, are not capable on animals.
We believe that human are similar to animal, human are more intelligence due to their higher evolution. As we are distinct from all the rest of the animal kingdom, because of the language, religion, moral agents that animals may not with this characteristics. However, human are about to same with the animals physically and mentally. We both have respiratory systems, digestive systems, emotion, desire and memory. So, all human are animals.
Human rights are the standard behavior in norms, which protected by the legal rights and laws. The human rights regard to the …show more content…

same inherent value we have, as a result of equal rights we owned. Having those creatures, said to be the subjects-of–a-life. Anything with inherent values, should be treated with equal respects and not to harm the one who with those creatures of inherent values. Therefore, human and animals are both with inherent values as the subject-of-a-life, must respect each other and help when in danger. Anyway, the nonhuman animal rights are fundamentally including the right to life, liberty and bodily integrity. Human activities of animal science, agriculture, hunting and trapping should be abolished immediately. In order to respect the all

Show More
Related

  • Similarities Between Utilitarianism And Animal Rights

    269 Words  | 2 Pages

    For vegetarians, animal rights should trump human rights. In “Utilitarianism, Vegetarianism, and Animal Rights,” Tom Regan defines animal rights as “the natural right to life” (307). Similar to Regan, many vegetarians believe that animals have rights and deserve to have their best interests taken into consideration, regardless of whether they are useful to humans. By switching to a plant-base diet, people will be able to alleviate the needless suffering and deaths of countless animals. Besides, in the same article, Regan also suggests “to treat animals in a more humane manner” (308).

    Read More

  • Bonnie Steinbock's Argument Analysis

    782 Words  | 4 Pages

    In this paper, I will focus on Bonnie Steinbock’s claim on whether or not we should give equal moral consideration to species outside our own species group. I will first determine what moral concern means, according to Peter singer, and explain how he views the human treatment of animals. I will then outline Steinbock’s argument against Singer’s position and explain how her criticism is part of a much broader issue: that is moral concern. I will finally make my argument against Steinbock as well as address any issues she could possibly raise against my argument. Peter Singer believed that all species, whether it be human or non-human, deserve equal consideration of interests and quality of life.

    Read More

  • A Change Of Heart About Animals Analysis

    526 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the articles of Jeremy Rifkin, Victoria Braithwaite, and Ed Yong, there's a deep research and debate whether animals should be given the right to have human rights or not. All authors include their perspective on the issue and provide scientific evidence. However, I believe that there should be a separation of rights between animals and humans because there is no biological basis for drawing the line. Giving the right to apes, what factors exclude other mammals like dogs, cats, and birds.

    Read More

  • Machan's Arguments Against Animal Rights

    1408 Words  | 6 Pages

    One topic that many scholars are debating right now is the topic of animal rights. The questions are, on what basis are rights given, and do animals possess rights? Two prominent scholars, Tom Regan and Tibor Machan, each give compelling arguments about animal rights, Regan for them and Machan against them. Machan makes the sharp statement, “Animals have no rights need no liberation” (Machan, p. 480). This statement was made in direct opposition to Regan who says, “Reason compels us to recognize the equal inherent value of these animals and, with this, their equal right to be treated with respect” (Regan, p. 477).

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Of All Animals Are Equal By Peter Singer

    673 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the article All Animals Are Equal, written by Peter Singer addresses the inadequacies surrounding the rights of animals in the societies of today. Singer opens the article by presenting a scholarly parallels between the fight for gender equality, banishment of racism and the establishment of rights for “nonhumans.” In order to explain this constant set of inequalities that seem to riddle our society, Singer readily uses the term “speciesism”, which he acquired from a fellow animals rights advocator, Richard Ryder. Essentially, this term is defined by Singer as a prejudice or attitude of bias in favor of the interests of members of one's own species and against those of members of other species. Singer claims that if this idea of speciesism

    Read More

  • Analysis Of All Animals Are Equal By Peter Singer

    1170 Words  | 5 Pages

    In human history, a number of oppressed groups have campaigned for equality, demanding for an expansion on the moral view of life, and to be treated fairly in the eye of consideration. This means that when the matter concerns this group, their voices are heard, and treated with value, and consideration. Where this equality is not determined by an assembly of facts like that group’s collective intelligence level, the colour of their skin, or the physical strength of their bodies. This is what Peter Singer brings up in his essay: “All Animals are Equal”, that non-human animals should have equal consideration with humans when matters concern them. Going into a specific set of non-human animals known as primates, I argue that primates should have some of the fundamental rights and equal consideration that are given to humans.

    Read More

  • Tom Regan Animal Rights Summary

    1543 Words  | 7 Pages

    It does not come in degrees and is not dependent on the being’s experiences and usefulness. Regan argues that if something has inherent value, it has rights and therefore deserves respect. An animal’s value is no less than a human’s, even when we fail to find an alternative in pursuing our goals. Our chosen goals should never be associated with

    Read More

  • Tom Regan's Argument For Animal Rights

    655 Words  | 3 Pages

    I will argue in favor of Regan’s principle that non-human animals should have moral rights. Tom Regan, a famous philosopher, proposed the idea “that animals have rights based on their inherent value as experiencing subjects of life” (Regan). For thousands of years, animals have been used for as pets, food, and labor. Throughout the past century, many philosophers, including Regan, have raised arguments on how we, as humans, are treating animals poorly.

    Read More

  • Nvq Level 2 Unit 2 Health And Social Care Values

    1878 Words  | 8 Pages

    Unit 2 HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE VALUE Learning aim A explore the care value that underpin current practice in health and social care We have done role play with young people with disabilities and old people and we demonstrate Confidentiality Dignity, Respect for the individual Safeguarding duty of care A person-centered approach to care delivery. Young people with a disability it was ok, we done with them how to decoration make Christmas card we down because Christmas is coming soon so we decided in group that we will do with them Christmas care and degradation it was very fun and there are very happy I use only some of them because we don't have enough time to play but still I use much I can.i have improved more about this. Aim A:Valuing

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Emotional Support Animals

    1021 Words  | 5 Pages

    In recent times there have been many cases of people bringing their “pets” that would be considered exotic or strange onto airplanes. Their reasoning for this is that these animals are their support animals. This has caused many issues for people trying to fly peacefully and can potentially be dangerous. What is an emotional support animal? “An emotional support animal is a non-human animal that provides companionship and comfort for its human owner or handler”(TherapyPet.org).

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech On Animal Testing

    1152 Words  | 5 Pages

    But let me tell you a story. When asking experimenters why they experiment on animals, the answer is “because the animals are like us”. But when asking experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, the answer is “because the animals are not like us”. (relate to audience) II. So whether animals are like humans or not?

    Read More

  • Animal Rights Argumentative Essay

    1084 Words  | 5 Pages

    In 1789 Jeremy Bentham, one of the very first animal rights activists, argued that animals should be treated with equality due to the fact that they are sentient. Meaning that not only are they aware of perception, but receptive to

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Should Animal Testing Be Banned?

    859 Words  | 4 Pages

    Firstly, animal testing should be banned is because of its cruelty. The

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Killing Animals

    1227 Words  | 5 Pages

    Killing Animals In the present, the world has changed in many sides. One of changing is numbers of killing animals are increasing continuous. Many people think what are reasons for this acting?

    Read More

  • Should Animal Testing Be Banned

    967 Words  | 4 Pages

    Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.

    Read More

More about Argumentative Essay: Why Humans Are Animals Mentally?

Open Document