ipl-logo

Kant Vs Leibniz

2042 Words9 Pages

How can God be perfectly good yet allow so much evil to exist throughout our world? Many wonder what is the cause of evil and why there is evil in our world. Thankfully, Gottfried Leibniz and Immanuel Kant came up with some insight to answer this question. However, these two leading philosophers have completely different views on the problem of evil. This essay will illustrate what Leibniz and Kant say about the problem of evil and how they contradict one another. Leibniz came up with three issues to prove why God is at fault for the problem of evil. They are; the deprivation problem, God is lenient with necessary evil, and the best possible world thesis. I will be defending Leibniz’s solutions against Kant’s contradicting responses.
Leibniz …show more content…

Leibniz does agree that God is the creator or everything and their parts. He also thinks that God is the author of everything that is real in our world. However, if God is the author of everything real and the creator of everything that ever existed then it must make him the author of all the deprivations in the world too. There cannot be no cause for the problem of evil. Everything has a cause, or started from somewhere or something. I think Leibniz would say that you cannot just say evil exists because it is an incidental product made from other products. Evil exists in our world for a reason other than it being a by-product of some other creation. Therefore, because God is the composer of everything and their parts and evil is included in this, this makes (him) immoral and unholy (Stanford Encyclopedia of …show more content…

Leibniz came up with three issues to prove why God is at fault for the problem of evil; the deprivation problem, God is lenient with necessary evil, and the best possible world thesis. Kant on the other hand, found a way to argue against each of these points and try to solve this problem. However, I believe that none of Kant’s objections would prove that God is not the sinner of evil. Therefore, I still do not know how God can be perfectly good yet allow so much evil exist throughout our world. There are so many possible solutions but no one has the ability to prove them. Perhaps this is why we have religion. We give faith in God by leaving all our unknown questions in the hands of (him) hoping, one day, we will have the answers to

Show More
Related

  • Book Report On Night By Elie Wiesel

    979 Words  | 4 Pages

    In addition, how can humans treat each other as though another human is just a bug that needs to be exterminated? Through the shocking stories, the reader also begins to question where God is; however, there needs to be a separation of blame. Human’s evil actions are not the responsibility of God. It must be recognized that humans have freewill to choose to do good or evil. Evil is of the world, but since God is not of the world, God is not responsible for the evil in the world.

    Read More

  • Voltaire's Candide: The Problem Of Evil

    490 Words  | 2 Pages

    The problem of evil philosophy has been a long debated topic. The idea that God is almighty, God is perfectly good, and evil exists has many different sides, which sparks many different explanations. During Candide, Voltaire addresses the topic with multiple examples applying to both moral and natural evils. However, the problem of evil to me is not as simple as one answer. I believe that there needs to be a certain extent of evil to bring out good and that is why God created it.

    Read More

  • The Local Problem Of Evil By Peter Van Inwagen

    1272 Words  | 6 Pages

    “The Problem of Evil” by Peter van Inwagen, is a series of lectures that that presents van Inwagen’s various responses to problem of evil. In this essay, I will present “the local problem of evil” (from chapter 6 of the book), the solution van Inwagen proposes for this problem, and my critique of his solution. “The local problem of evil,” according to van Inwagen, is the hypothetical response an atheist would have towards van Inwagen’s solution of “the global problem of evil” which is, “If god existed, then why is there so much evil in the world?” The argument of “the local problem of evil” is “If god existed then why are there specific horrors that occur in the world, like children dying in a horrific car crash?” The argument that is drawn

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Jonathan Edwards And Upon The Burning Of Our House

    666 Words  | 3 Pages

    Therefore, God is responsible for all things good and bad. Bradstreet states, “A price so vast as is unknown Yet by his gift is made thine own/ There's wealth enough, I need no more,/ Farewell my pelf, farewell my store/ The world no longer let me love/

    Read More

  • A Master's In Christian Apologetics, By Greg Koukl

    1589 Words  | 7 Pages

    As shown above, God did create everything, so, if He did create all things, and He did not create evil, then evil must not be a thing (Augustine on Evil). This is an argument made by Greg Koukl. He has a Master’s Degree in Philosophy of Religion and Ethics, a Master’s in Christian Apologetics, and is a professor of Christian Apologetics at Biola University. His argument helps to further prove the points already made above, and really helps to explain the existence of evil.

    Read More

  • Response To Eleonore Stump's Paper

    441 Words  | 2 Pages

    Eleonore Stumps starts her paper by explaining what the problem of evil is. The problem of evil is that the claim God is omnipotent and omniscient is contradicting to what is evident in the world, that evil exist. Many philosophers who are agreeing in this claim believes that if God is all powerful and all knowing he would have diminished the evil that exist in the world. For this to be true there must be evidence that God is morally incapable to do what is right. However, Stumps takes a different turn to prove that there is another reason why evil exists in the world, by looking at different Christian beliefs in details.

    Read More

  • Darkness In Elie Wiesel's Night

    1026 Words  | 5 Pages

    The roots of evil are either logical or evidential problem of evil. For example, the first logical argument is that evil is a necessity in our world. Hank explains the the purpose of evil in a sense that “good can’t exist without its opposite….. You can’t understand the concept of pleasure without experiencing pain first” (Crash Course #13). Hank’s first argument hints that God is aware of the evil and powerful enough to prevent it but chooses not too.

    Read More

  • JL Mackie's Argument For The Existence Of God?

    295 Words  | 2 Pages

    JL Mackie was persuasive in his argument by showing that belief in an almighty God is not rational. He proves this by posing the problem of evil. According to JL Mackie, if God exists and is omniscient, omnipotent, and good then evil would not exist. However, evil exists in this world, sometimes in the form of undeserved suffering (diseases that affect humans, earthquakes, famines ...) and others perpetrated by man (murders, wars ...). If God exists and has the capability to be powerful, good, omniscient and omnipotent, why would he let evil be perpetrated?

    Read More

  • Problem Of Evil Mackie Analysis

    1089 Words  | 5 Pages

    The existence of God has been presented by a multitude of philosophers. However, this has led to profound criticism and arguments of God’s inexistence. The strongest argument in contradiction to God’s existence is the Problem of Evil, presented by J.L Mackie. In this paper, I aim to describe the problem of evil, analyse the objection of the Paradox of Omnipotence and provide rebuttals to this objection. Thus, highlighting my support for Mackie’s Problem of evil.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: The Problem Of Evil

    877 Words  | 4 Pages

    “The Problem of Evil” is simply the question, why does God allow evil to happen? God is omnipotent, omniscient, all-loving, and rational, therefore why does evil exist? There is either no God or he is not what we think he is, since evil could be prevented by him with no risk. Atheists and anti-theodicist see a problem with the idea that God could prevent evil. They believe that because God is so powerful and perfect, that he would not allow such immoral actions to be done.

    Read More

  • Cultural Differences Between Good And Evil

    1242 Words  | 5 Pages

    Through out history evil has been best depicted as the absence of goodness and goodness as the absence of evil. With goodness being comprehended as the direct opposite of evil. It is under speculation that maybe there can 't exist only one general meaning of good vs. evil. I trust this, in light of the fact that any one individual 's perception of good or evil is without a doubt directed by one 's social comprehension of certain qualities and ethics within their culture, i.e. the power of social conformity (Muncaster-Social Psychology Lecture, 2016). Yes, there can be cases of evil that is seen as malevolent all over the world but due to the ethnocentric component of the perception of cultural morals and values, one is unable to categorize another individual as evil or good based upon their own cultural understanding of this notion.

    Read More

  • Richard Swinburne Why God Allows Evil Analysis

    436 Words  | 2 Pages

    In this reading reflection I will be discussing Richard Swinburne’s argument on “Why God Allows Evil” which starts on page 254 in “Exploring Philosophy: An Anthology” by Steven M. Cahn. This was also discussed in class on 9/15/16. In his argument Swinburne states that “An omnipotent God could have prevented this evil, and surely a perfectly good and omnipotent God would have done so. So why is there evil?”(Swinburne, 254).

    Read More

  • Walter Sinnott-Armstrong's Argument Analysis

    2349 Words  | 10 Pages

    The problem of evil takes into account three defining features of God: all-good, all-knowing, and all-powerful and questions whether such a God would permit evil and not interfere. Sinnott-Armstrong discusses his stance by countering responses he coins as the Glorious Response, the Modest Response, and the Overriding Response. Whereas, Craig counters the arguments made by Sinnott-Armstrong. The Glorious Response Thus response suggests evil is

    Read More

  • Mackie's Evil And Omnipotence

    933 Words  | 4 Pages

    Questioning if God is not omnipotent, the entire idea of God creating the world can be called into question. Another issue is that if it is said that God is no longer entirely good there is the possibility to say that God has evil or bad intentions, and we should denounce him. Lastly, if one says that evil does not exist, then there is no possible way to separate those people who are considered to be deviants of society. This would mean that those who commit crimes that are evil in nature like murder and rape would be considered to be normal and acceptable.

    Read More

  • The Argument For The Problem Of Evil

    929 Words  | 4 Pages

    This argument can be set up as following: 1. If God exists and is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent, there is no evil in this world. 2. Obviously,

    Read More

More about Kant Vs Leibniz

Open Document