ipl-logo

Categorical Imperative Theory: A Case Study

996 Words4 Pages

Before I discuss the theories, I would like to point out the Jean 's important actions that will be analyze to determine whether he acts justly. The first point to realize is that Jean acted based on his self interest of saving his friend. Second, Jean broke laws by hacking into the Pharmacy 's security. Third, Jean lied (arguable) to the pharmacist. Fourth, Jean made the pharmacist break rules by giving Jean medication that he would otherwise not give if he knew the truth. Those are the four points that will be analyzed to evaluate Jean 's action.

Kantianism:
About:
Kantianism uses a unique principle of duty rather than measurement. In Kantianism, a person act purely because of a universal moral rule that is based on the Categorical Imperative. This action is done regardless of the consequences afterward because duty is more important. To determine what rules are valid, the Categorical Imperative has two important checks: the rules must be universally applicable, meaning anyone can do follow it and it will not change due to certain circumstances; and that the rules must never make other people use people purely for the purpose of achieving his or her goals. If a rule passes those checks, it is valid and must be follow.

Analyze:
While there is no real list of …show more content…

Every action must fill the major of people with happiness or satisfaction regardless of one 's personal desire. Because Act Utilitarianism is about making each action worthwhile, the actor must evaluate the action each time he or she acts. However, there is a chance of moral luck: the chance of acting in good intent, but an uncalculated mishap happened, causing the opposite outcome. Act Utilitarianism followers would say even if a person act in good intent, but an unexpected event happen to create a devastating outcome, the person did not act

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Dawn Riley At American True

    1311 Words  | 6 Pages

    In other words, the only effect of an action that is relevant is the bad and good outcomes it produces (Henry, 2011). It is notable that people who uphold utilitarianism believe that morality has the purpose of making life better by way of increasing

    Read More

  • Importance Of Utilitarianism In Marketing To Children

    1312 Words  | 6 Pages

    It states that an action which is deemed right is one that has not merely some good consequences, but also the greatest amount of good consequences possible when the negative consequences are also given due considerations. According to the utilitarian principle, the righteousness of an action is solely judged on the basis of its consequences. Classical utilitarianism determines the balance of pleasure and pain for each individual affected by the action in question as well as the amount of utility for the whole

    Read More

  • Practical Imperative: A Case Study

    200 Words  | 1 Pages

    Practical Imperative : Kingdom of ends was an ideal Kant give to rational people accepted rules for them selves whether are receiving or giving any action. In Terry vs Ohio is a decision by the Supreme court that unreasonable searching without cause violates this amendment ,in the case of stop and frisk cops needs to have reasonable suspicion that this person has committed, is committing is about to committed a crime, the officer may stop and frisk the suspect. Stop and Frisk in New York between 1994-2013 reduce crime in the street by 85%, taking drugs, illegal arms, more 20 years this type of police make New York City reduce crime and make NYC capital of the safest place in America, however went this policy is for the used for the people

    Read More

  • Ethical Theory Of Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative

    890 Words  | 4 Pages

    The end does not justify the means. This was the principal ethical theory of Immanuel Kant and made up his ‘Categorical Imperative’, a deontological argument which showcased how certain actions are fundamentally wrong, such as murder, lying or torture and can therefore, never be justified. Contrastingly a utilitarian would claim that the ends do in fact justify the means and would enact a focus on outcomes in deciding whether or not an action is morally permissible. In 2002 Jakob Von Metzler, a boy of just twelve years, was kidnapped and a police officer threatened the kidnapper, Magnus Gafgen, with torture in an attempt to find and save the child. Gafgen told the officer that he had killed the boy and then disclosed the location of the body.

    Read More

  • John Stuart Mill On Happiness Essay

    852 Words  | 4 Pages

    A man by the name of John Stuart Mill seems to be able to give us some answers to these questions. Mill starts our inquiring journey with defining what utilitarianism stands for. In short he states that it is the construction of utility, which claims that the actions that stimulate happiness in is morally fit and vice versa to be unfit. Happiness is something that we want for

    Read More

  • Objection To Act Utilitarianism

    1217 Words  | 5 Pages

    A main objection to act utilitarianism is that it can be impossible to determine the scope, intensity, and/or the duration of the action. People cannot possibly predict every single outcome that will come from an action and the affect it will have for sure. Another objection to act utilitarianism is that it makes people rely to heavily on morals when making their decision. This turns even the simplest decision into some complicated process that is not needed. For example, people do not need to look at the intensity when they are deciding what chips to buy at the grocery store, they can simply just choose the one they like best.

    Read More

  • Famous French Philosopher: Jean-Jacques Rousseau

    779 Words  | 4 Pages

    another big part of jeans book the social contract was that humans are all born good but are corrupted by society this is why jean thought that all people must enter a “social contract” that requires people to recognize a collective good will,which represents the common good or public intrest.another famous book that jean made was a book called the discorse on the arts and sciences, this book was a response to an essay contest that was about had resent advances in the arts and sciences contributed to what was called the purifacation of morals. jean then had an apifomi,it struck him that civerlition and progress had not infact improved people instead they had a terrible influence on the morality of human beings who had once been good.rosseau then went on to win the essay contest and his book became a best seller.although most people did not agree with rosseaus ideas as he produced more books and more evidence to back up his ideas people began to relise what he was talking about and what he meant in his books and

    Read More

  • Rule Utilitarianism

    1193 Words  | 5 Pages

    When discussing both act and rule utilitarianism, it is important to understand that both of them agree in terms of the overall consequence of an action, because they emphasize on creating the most beneficial pleasure and happiness in the outcome of an act. Despite this fact, they both have different principles and rules that make them different from each other. Act utilitarianism concentrates on the acts of individuals. Meaning that if a person commits an action, he/she must at least have a positive utility. The founders of utilitarianism define positive utility as happiness and pleasure and consider it to be a driving force of all positive and morally right acts.

    Read More

  • Essay On Divine Command Theory

    1218 Words  | 5 Pages

    The main principle of utilitarianism is happiness. People who follow this theory strive to fulfill the “ultimate good”. The “ultimate good” is defined as ultimate pleasure with out any pain. It is said that the pleasure can be of any quantity and any quality, but pleasures that are weighted more important are put at a higher level than others that are below it. This ethical theory also states that if society would fully embrace utilitarianism then people would naturally realize their moral standing in the

    Read More

  • Critical Analysis Of John Stuart Mill's 'Utilitarianism'

    1564 Words  | 7 Pages

    Utilitarian suggest that we make our moral decisions from the position of a benevolent, disinterested spectator. Rather than thinking about

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Kant's Categorical Imperative

    1222 Words  | 5 Pages

    Ethics and the search for a good moral foundation first drew me into the world of philosophy. It is agreed that the two most important Ethical views are from the world’s two most renowned ethical philosophers Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill. In this paper, I will explore be analyzing Mill’s Greatest Happiness Principle and Kant’s Categorical Imperative. In particular, I want to discuss which principle provides a better guideline for making moral decisions. And which for practical purposes ought to be taught to individuals.

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism In Business Ethics

    1685 Words  | 7 Pages

    However, this is much more complex than the seemingly practical to use act utilitarianism. Assigning different ‘levels’ to different pleasures and pains can take up a considerable amount of time, when sometimes a quick decision is necessary. Furthermore, with both act and rule utilitarianism, the pleasure and pain of every potential situation must be calculated to decide the most moral course of action. However, it is impossible for one person, or even a group of people, to perfectly calculate every potential outcome – many situations will have extremely different consequences to what was originally predicted. Moreover, especially in larger companies, it is hard to measure far-reaching

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Maxim

    582 Words  | 3 Pages

    Using Kant’s notion of a maxim it would be wrong to cheat on the final exam in a course that you do not like and feel you will not benefit from. In the book it stated this, “Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) argued that lying is wrong under any circumstances. He did not appeal to religion; instead, he held that lying is forbidden by reason itself” (Rachels 129). This shows that no matter what the situation may be that lying is looked down upon. He believed that every rational person should believe the Categorical Imperative.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Utilitarianism In The Movie The Island

    1524 Words  | 7 Pages

    So, what is act utilitarianism? Act utilitarianism is best defined as a value of consequences of the act when it is determining whether it is the right act and if it brings about the greatest good consequences for all. In addition, for most act utilitarian’s, they do think that even though telling the truth is a moral action , but if it brings about the greatest good for everyone from immoral acts, it can be considered as ethically moral or immoral in the eyes of the law based on situations. From the observations of the movie, the Island, an act utilitarian would view this movie based on the different situations that takes place. As an example from the movie, the Island, Jordan two delta, known as Scarlett Johansson which is the clone, in the outer world has made the right act based on the consequences in which she diversified the mind of the working policemen by saying “open the door “while holding up a gun and the military officer, Albert Laurent shoots two of the working policemen in the isolation of the outer world in order to save the lives of the lottery winner people who is caught inside the door while suffocating to death.

    Read More

  • Cardinal Principles Essay

    1076 Words  | 5 Pages

    Evaluate the effectiveness of the ‘cardinal principles’ enunciated by Prof. Ian Dennis vis-à-vis reversal of burden onto the defendant in criminal cases. To what extend does it achieve it’s purpose? Introduction In Woolmington v DPP, Viscount Sankey LC laid down the golden thread rule (also known as concept of presumption of innocence) which presumed the defendant is innocence until proven guilty by the prosecution by proposed “Throughout the web of the English criminal law, one golden thread is always be seen, that it is the duty of the prosecution to prove the prisoner’s guilt…”

    Read More

More about Categorical Imperative Theory: A Case Study

Open Document