ipl-logo

Kantianism Vs Utilitarianism

551 Words3 Pages

According to a Utilitarian approach killing the orphan boy would be a reasonable choice to make as it could be seen as doing the most good for the most people. Kantians beliefs would argue that killing the boy would be morally wrong as this approach brings about a firm belief that every person has rights and that all actions should be done with doing the right in mind. I believe a rational person would have chosen not to kill Parker, the orphan boy. Although the utilitarian’s views believe this murder would be justified in that it is killing one to spare three lives it isn’t evident at the time of the murder when the crew will be rescued, if ever. They could have killed Parker and then not be rescued for weeks leaving them again with a choice to murder to survive. I feel that stating killing the boy maximizes happiness for the other crew members families isn’t a strong argument, how can we not think of the happiness that the boy could have had throughout his life had he survived. …show more content…

Utilitarianism aims at achieving what is useful for people. It aims at the greatest good for the greatest amount of people. Kantians defines morals in relation of absolute duty. They believe right behavior should be chose regardless of the consequences. The problem I see with Kantianism is its too absolute. Although I believe in doing what is morally right, all situations and scenarios aren’t the same. What if we are faced with another war, Kantians would think it would be wrong to murder no matter the circumstance which would jeopardize our entire country. The problem with the Utilitarian approach is its too relative. Morals would be a thing of the past and people would take the law into their own hands. This view allows much room for selfishness as people could feel it would be fine to kill someone if others don’t like the person

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Just Mercy By Bryan Stevenson

    252 Words  | 2 Pages

    Children should not be sentenced to life imprisonment for their crimes, as such sentences ignore the developmental differences between children and adults. These life sentences can have adverse long-term effects on the mental health and well-being of the child. In Bryan Stevenson’s Just Mercy, Charlie is a 14-year-old boy seen as a perfect student despite getting sentenced for murdering his mother’s abusive boyfriend, George. He was transferred to an adult jail and seen as a target for the older adult inmates, risking Charlie’s safety. Bryan Stevenson is an attorney who studied Charlie’s case and wants to represent him.

    Read More

  • The Colorado Theater Massacre

    801 Words  | 4 Pages

    How a human being can do such a thing to an innocent child? Veronica cannot be returned to her mother, she is dead. It is not a secret that there is no worst pain to a mother then loosing her child. In the massacre Ashley had lost two of them. A man who is convicted of this intentional killing must spend life in jail with no

    Read More

  • Atticus Finch's Path

    653 Words  | 3 Pages

    He was innocent and killing him would serve no

    Read More

  • The Trolley Problem By Phillipa Foot

    1146 Words  | 5 Pages

    What would Immanuel Kant think the answer would be? On the other side of the argument, what did the person who originally proposed the trolley problem, Philippa Foot, think the answer was? Although Kant passed away before the trolley problem was proposed; we can still grasp what Kant would think of this problem using his own form of ethical theory, kantianism. Kant believed that even if an action was good if your motivation was corrupt then the action is immoral. For example, if you found a lost dog and you have wanted a dog your whole life you could just keep the dog but instead, you reunite it with its owner only because there is a reward.

    Read More

  • The Boy In The Striped Research Paper

    338 Words  | 2 Pages

    The children didn’t only die from murder but from not being taken car right and not being healthy. Another way the book

    Read More

  • Film Analysis: Extreme Measures

    783 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the film Extreme Measures someone can find ideas of Secular Ethics throughout the film involving Utilitarianism and its basic tenets along with Kantian analysis. The basic tenets of Utilitarianism include the principle of utility, Hedonism, and the viewpoint of a disinterested and benevolent spectator. While the tenets of Kantian Ethics, which include good will, the formula of universal law, the formula of the end itself, and the categorical imperative. These basic ideas setup arguments for and against the Utilitarian ideas set up by doctor Myrick. In the film doctor Myrick makes the claim that it is worth the deaths of unwilling subjects in order to help/save the lives of millions.

    Read More

  • Is Utilitarianism The More Ethical Choice?

    265 Words  | 2 Pages

    The moral philosophy for crash decisions that seems the most ethical to me would be utilitarianism. The goal of utilitarianism is to “make decisions that result in the greatest total utility, or the greatest benefit for all those affected by a decision” (Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Ferrell, 2013). When considering autonomous vehicles (AVs), who makes the decision on what is the greatest benefit for all those affected? Is it the programmer, the government, or the drivers who will be affected by the decisions the most? There is little argument that AVs are the transportation of the future, and when considering whether utilitarianism is the more ethical choice, you must consider some facts.

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Theory Of The Death Penalty

    706 Words  | 3 Pages

    Even though it is true that taking the life of another is not right, it is even truer that the punishment should fit the crime. The death penalty is an exercise of justice that promotes retribution for crime and moral punishment for those who choose to take human life. Also, it prevents society 's worse offenders from re-offending, and it provides justice for the victims whose lives were cut short without a second thought. To better understand why capital punishment is a justifiable act, Kant 's theory gives a clear and logical understanding of the eye for an eye approach. Additionally the utilitarian view also explains why capital punishment is justifiable in regards to comfort for the victim 's family and prevention of re-offending.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Ursula Leguin's The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas

    927 Words  | 4 Pages

    Because Utilitarian’s believe that, “our prime ethical obligation is to choose the action available to us that is likely to create the greatest balance of good effects over negative effects,” the problem of Omelas is not even a problem, and those of the Utilitarian mindset would gladly stay (Binder, 2). Some people, however, walk away. Even though they cannot fix the problem, they can absolve themselves of guilt and eliminate themselves from the equation altogether. This closely aligns with Kantian thinking, because our intrinsic human

    Read More

  • Kantian Ethics Vs Utilitarianism

    428 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to Kantian ethics, we have moral duties and we should never abandon them. This theory claims that we are not one-hundred percent sure of what is good and what is bad; therefore, we should follow certain rules instead of doing wrong thing trying to avoid bad things to happen. For example, we should never lie even if the lie will benefit the humanity in general and never affect anyone. One of the clearest examples about the disagreement between Utilitarianism and Kantian ethics is lying.

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism: A Consequentialist Ethical Theories

    328 Words  | 2 Pages

    Trolley Problem- week2 “Utilitarianism -A consequentialist ethical theory that holds that morally right actions, laws, or policies are those whose consequences contain the greatest positive value and least negative value compared to the consequences of available alternatives. (Thames, 2018.). " With this being said do we really believe its okay to sacrifice the greater good of a person, meaning to kill five and save one?

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Utilitarianism And Kant

    761 Words  | 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism and Kantian extreme deontology are two very different aspects of ethics. Merriam Webster defines utilitarianism as, “a doctrine that the useful is the good and that the determining consideration of right conduct should be the usefulness of its consequences.” Kant’s extreme view on deontology “believed that certain types of actions were absolutely prohibited, even in cases where the action would bring about more happiness than the alternative” (Kantian Ethics). When evaluating the differences and coming up with examples such as, how the president of the United States would make decisions regarding the situation between how the tensions between the United States and the USSR occurred, after the United States accidentally bombed Moscow. The choice the president has to make is to either bomb New York City, killing roughly seven million, or letting Moscow resort to a full-scale nuclear war against the United States, killing over one hundred million.

    Read More

  • Kant's Ethics Vs. Utilitarian Ethics

    1023 Words  | 5 Pages

    He says that one must act not only in accordance to duty, but for the sake of duty However, According to the Utilitarianism, Mill emphasizes that the actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness Immanuel Kant is the founder of the Kantian branch of ethics and morality, and his theories are personally my favorite theory of ethics so far. According to the utilitarianism, the best action is the one that maximizes utility. However, in Kant’s moral philosophy, people

    Read More

  • Examples Of Utilitarianism

    1041 Words  | 5 Pages

    If there is a bomber who plants a bomb in a building downtown and it would kill and harm thousands of innocent people but the only way to find the bomb was to torture the bomber. I would torture him because it would save thousands of lives at the cost of one, which is what someone who believes in utilitarianism would say. It’s the only logical decision to make because why would you want to end the lives of thousands because you don’t want to harm one person. Utilitarianism is already in our lives today, when the government passes laws they vote and whatever the majority is will decide wither it gets passed or not. When we vote for a new prime minister, councillor or even a class president that all gets decided by what the majority chooses which a perfect example of what utilitarianism is

    Read More

  • Organ Donation Persuasive Essay

    1139 Words  | 5 Pages

    Firstly, let’s remind a bit its main elements. Utilitarianism, according to Jeremy Bentham, designates “the greatest happiness of the greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong”. In other words, we should support any action that would enhance utility (utility is a pretty large concept including number of lives saved) of the whole society considered as one social body. Here, you don’t consider any individuals in particular, but really the set of people.

    Read More

More about Kantianism Vs Utilitarianism

Open Document