ipl-logo

Kant's Moral Ethics

58 Words1 Page

1. Kant 's moral is excessively compelling seeing that it avoids feeling from ethical decision making and makes duty central. 2. Kant neglects to recognize with the exception of oneself from a principle and qualifying a rule on the basis of exemptions. 3. It is not generally clear when individuals are dealt with as ends and just as means.

Show More
Related

  • Immanuel Kant's Groundwork For The Metaphysic Of Moral

    735 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Immanuel Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals, Kant talks about the terms “acting from duty” and “acting according to duty” (8-10). Chapter one, “Moving from common-sense knowledge to philosophical knowledge about morality” goes much more in depth in talking about the differences between acting from duty, and acting according to duty. In class, we talk a lot about how Kant uses the phrase “One should”. We know that phrase translates to actually doing what ever actions someone is asking you to do(8e). If someone is telling you “you should take out the trash” you know they are actually telling you to take out the trash and you should just do what they ask.

    Read More

  • What Is Immanuel Kant's Ethical Theory

    315 Words  | 2 Pages

    A modern law enforcement officer is taught to think critically and reflect on expected circumstances to possess some effective skills on leadership. Furthermore, law enforcement officers who has a strong problem solving skills and effective communication skills also develop community policing potentials. Improving a better understanding of leadership allows the public to respect the professionalism that a police officer upholds. Immanuel Kant’s ethical theories believe that an individual has the ability to make rational decision based on the action given to them (Kant 's Ethics, 2002). Immanuel Kant’s ethical theories are to illustrate the importance of duty and moral standards.

    Read More

  • Moral Reasonings According To Kant's Utilitarianism

    981 Words  | 4 Pages

    The two moral reasonings are consequentialist and categorical. Consequentialist means the consequences that will result after whatever you do whether it is the right or wrong thing to do. Categorical means that both the action and consequence matter to you, so you think more about what you 'll do becuase you know what the consequence will be. ⦁ What is the “principle of utility” according to Mill? Explain what Mill means by “utilitarianism.”

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism And Kantian Ethics

    833 Words  | 4 Pages

    Kantians believe that the rightness or wrongness of an action does not depend on the consequences, but on whether they fulfill a duty. They must act in a way that will produce the greatest overall amount of good in the world. In this view there is no obligation to give money to a homeless person, but it is the right thing to do. Kant’s supreme moral principle is the categorical imperative. The categorical imperative is a moral law that is unconditional for all agents because of intrinsic value.

    Read More

  • Kant's Immanuel: Grounding Of Metaphysics Of Mo

    658 Words  | 3 Pages

    Philosophy 100 Steven Phan Kant, Immanuel: Grounding of Metaphysics of Moral 10-19-15 The first of Kant’s essay about metaphysics on morality, he revealed to us that it is one’s sense of duty, which makes it a moral action. He also explained what logic is as it pertains understanding the most reasonable course to take, and as well as how it can only be a pure concept as it does not derive from experiences. Taking all of this into account, in the second part of Kant’s essay, he start with the idea that there is now way to give an example of a moral action outside of it being of duty.

    Read More

  • Kant's Groundwork Of The Metaphysics Of Morals

    313 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Groundwork of the Metaphysics of morals, provides some example of where man a wants to waste his talents. On page 35, Kant explains in his third example that to find “himself a talent that by means of some cultivation could make him a useful human being in all sorts of respect”. Kant explains that talent should be wasted if it will bring a joyful situation. But one should not waste their talent if it will be pain to one self. Kant also questions his own talent and wonders if he is wasting his talent for not making it a reality.

    Read More

  • Kant's Ethics: Jim Doesn T Kill The Indian Man

    1207 Words  | 5 Pages

    As a Kantian, the ultimate goal is to focus on our maxims and not on how much pain or pleasure the act could possibly produce. So as a result, Kant would argue that Jim should not kill the Indian man, even if it would save the other Indian men. The reason why is because Kant does not believe in using people as mere means, it wouldn’t be considered a conceivable maxim, and it would be betraying a perfect duty. The definition of deontology is having the belief that you do what’s right because you have a moral duty.

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    871 Words  | 4 Pages

    Immanuel Kant’s moral theory differs greatly from the other theories we have learned about, especially Mill’s view of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is based on the consequences of actions, while Kantian Ethics focuses on the intentions a person has before they act, and if they are fulfilling their duty as a person when acting. Kant explains his theory by providing examples of different people who are all doing the same action, but for different reasons. He discusses a store owner who charges everyone equal prices and explains that this only has moral worth if he is acting from duty, meaning he does this because it is what is right. The act is not moral if he acts in accordance with duty, or because he is worried about his reputation or business.

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Utilitarianism

    1228 Words  | 5 Pages

    Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are two of the most notable philosophers in normative ethics. This branch of ethics is based on moral standards that determine what is considered morally right and wrong. This paper will focus on Immanuel Kant’s theory of deontology and J.S. Mill’s theory of utilitarianism. While Mill takes a consequentialist approach, focused on the belief that actions are right if they are for the benefit of a majority, Kant is solely concerned with the nature of duty and obligation, regardless of the outcome. This paper will also reveal that Kantian ethics, in my opinion, is a better moral law to follow compared to the utilitarian position.

    Read More

  • Theories Of Utilitarianism, Kantianism, And Aristotelianism

    1163 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout history many great philosophers have attempted to unravel the origins of virtues by developing moral theories of their own. This document is designed to provide the reader with an overview of some of the more popular theories concerning morals. Three of the most popular moral theories are… Utilitarianism, Kantianism, and Aristotelianism. Though Utilitarianism, Kantianism, and Aristotelianism differ in many ways, they also share similar fundamentals. Utilitarianism is a highly acclaimed theory that is morally based on consequentialism.

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Grounding For The Metaphysics Of

    1625 Words  | 7 Pages

    In the late 18th century, German philosopher Immanuel Kant wrote extensively on the basis of morals. In his Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals¸ Kant describes the dichotomy present in humans which is a result of humans being both a rational and a natural creature. The rational portion of human pulls them towards acting morally through use of reason. At the same time, the natural aspect of human beings acts as a counterweight, pulling people towards their natural inclinations, especially self-interest. The strength of this counterweight seems massive when a look is taken at human history.

    Read More

  • Kant's Ethics Vs. Utilitarian Ethics

    1023 Words  | 5 Pages

    Hyejin Jang Professor Writing DED 8 April 2016. 4. 7. Kant’s ethics differs from utilitarian ethics both in its scope and in the precision with which it guides action. In The Categorical Imperative, Kant emphasizes that human autonomy is the essence of morality.

    Read More

  • Kantian Ethics Immanuel Kant

    565 Words  | 3 Pages

    Emily Herman Hickman, Andrew PHL 200 March 5, 2015 KANT There are many philosophers that are known. One of these philosophers is Immanuel Kant. Kant had very interesting outlooks on aspects, like perspectives and free will. In most of his theories, Kant relied heavily on the fact that free will existed in order for this to be true.

    Read More

  • Kantian Ethics: Three Categories Of The Ethical World

    1248 Words  | 5 Pages

    Kantian Ethics is one of three categories in the ethical world. Kantian Ethics deals with the intentions behind an action, not the consequences. The intentions should be “right”. For the intentions to be right, one must act from one’s duties and out of respect for the moral law. Based on the intent of the action performed, the action is then judged accordingly.

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism Vs. Kant On Morality

    141 Words  | 1 Pages

    Unlike Kant’s view on the morality, Utilitarianism suggests very different idea. Contrast to Kant, utilitarianism is result-based ethic that suggests “an ethically right choice in a given situation is the one that produces the most happiness and the least unhappiness for the largest number of people” (Farias, p.12). Base on utilitarianism, if killing or hurting other people can provide greater happiness to large number of people, it is moral action to do so. Yet, according to Kant, it cannot be a moral thing to do since it does not pass the universalizability test. If everyone supports to kill or hurt other people for the greater happiness, then there will be no one left in this earth because everyone will kill each other to gain the most happiness.

    Read More

More about Kant's Moral Ethics

Open Document