Summary Of The Promise By John Stuart Mill Summary And Analysis

885 Words4 Pages
Joseph Apodaca

Professor Carol Enns

Philosophy 5

February 21, 2018
Analysis Paper

All families can demand a lot from us. Naturally, they expect love, attention, and support. But sometimes, they also ask for things that I’m for more tangible, like money. Most of us are fairly generous people, and want to help a family member or friend when we can. Kant is more rigid with the rules meaning a rule is set in place for a reason so it is supposed to be followed. He writes “ well worth Avenue in action depends neither on the result expected from that action nor on any principle of action that has to borrow its motive from this expected result” (Kant 106). this means the decisions and should not be made based on what the person will receive or what the person has the ability to receive. For example, I have moved my friend money for him to be able to purchase wheels for his truck. Give me money back was not an issue because he is not he would find himself a transportation to school which will benefit his future as well as his ability to get to his job. So, Kant’s . Is that a person should not do favors for others if they are only hoping to receive equal or more pay out instead of just doing what’s right for someone.
…show more content…
Mobile argues that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (Mill 118). This means that when actions are done quantitatively and happiness comes more often. Be happy responsible is the intent of producing pleasure with the absence of any pain. And example is when I want my fucking money, he had only asked for a certain amount to purchase regular tires and wheels here I knew he wanted something better so you margarine out. So, Mill’s point is that it is better to produce more happiness and in return there will be less
Open Document