Views on Society’s Problems The nineteenth century was a series of pivotal years in world history. The world was changing due to the rapid industrialization taking place in the 1800s. To keep up with massive demands for goods, masses of laborers would work in overcrowded factories. Unfortunately as a result, the wealthy was getting wealthier and the poor, in relation, was getting poorer. Karl Marx and Samuel Smiles voiced their opinions about the changing and unfair society in their respective writings, The Communist Manifesto and Thrift. There they emphasized their opinions on social class, problems in society, and various ways to improve. While equality was what both wanted to achieve, they differed in the ways they viewed the social classes and how society could reform …show more content…
Wealthy elites or the bourgeoisie continued to earn high profits while the poor proletarians continued to take part in labor intensive work in factories. Marx and Smiles both saw this as a major problem in their society. In Marx’s Communist Manifesto, he wrote, “ not only are they [the proletarians] slaves of the bourgeois class, and of the bourgeois state; they are daily and hourly enslaved by the machine, by the overlooker, and above all, by the individual bourgeois manufacturer himself…” What Marx means is that the bourgeoisie is looking down at the proletariats and using them as merely a way to earn profit. In contrast to Marx, Smiles said, “...they [the proletarians] resemble the savage tribes, who know no better, and do no worse.” Smiles is comparing them to savage tribes to emphasize their inept social understanding. He blamed the poor for their destitute lives because they lacked the knowledge to improve themselves to become wealthy. While Marx sided with the poverty stricken population, Smiles argued that the wealthy were in the right. However, both would agree that there were problems in society that needed
They draw their conclusion from Karl Marx’s view of class and societies. Outside forces prevent groups or individuals from reaching certain goals or ways of living. That outside force is typically the upper class. The upper class have created an exclusive society for themselves that lock in their wealth at the expense of everyone else’s well-being. For example the CEO of Wal Mart, Michael Duke receives a $35 million yearly salary.
The 19th century was, by every definition of the word, a simultaneously onerous and distressing time in Europe. Empires and regimes collapsed like dominos, one after the other. Mass famine, caused by factors as extensive and diverse as severe climate abnormalities to colossal, all-out wars, led to the suffering and death of many. With farmers no longer financially independent, poverty reared its ugly head. The utter lack of any kind of political or religious freedom was widely conspicuous.
IHUM 202 Name¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬_______Nhi Tran_________________________ Reading Questions Communist Manifesto 1. What are the impulses and systems that allowed the bourgeoisie to develop and increase as a social class? There are many factors that contribute to the development of the bourgeoisie: - the discovery of America - the rounding of the Cape - the East Indian and Chinese markets - the colonization of America - trade with the colonies - the increase in the means of exchange and in commodities These advantages undoubtedly help the bourgeoisie gain rapid growth in commerce, navigation and industry.
The Civil War and Reconstruction period, Gilded Age, Imperialism, and World War I all brought challenges, expansion, and transformation to this nation and it’s people. These periods would change the nation, “In the years following the Civil War, formed and their white allies, North and South, would seek to redefine the meaning and boundaries of American freedom” (Give Me Liberty 555). The Civil War split apart the nation due to slavery differences between the North and South. The historical narrative from 1865 through World War I involves the challenges faced with inequality and violence resulting in the transformation of geographical space, cultural landscape, and political institutions. The Civil War exacerbated existing racial discrimination
The turn of the 19th century to the 20th century was a time for great success. The Industrial Revolution produced jobs for many and created a time of prosperity. Although with that success came great challenges that could be difficult to overcome if America did not make the correct political, social, and economical decisions. Some of these great challenges included foreign affairs, immigration and racial relations, economics, and politics. These challenges could either break or make America and all of them had a very dramatic effect on life today.
According to Indergraard (2007), industrialization is “the process by which an economy shifts from an agricultural to a manufacturing base during a period of sustained change and growth, eventually creating a higher standard of living”. Within sociology, the three founding fathers, particularly Karl Marx and Émile Durkheim, were interested in studying what the causes of industrialization and the consequences of it on the development of society. This essay will compare the ways in which Marx and Durkheim shared similar ideas about industrialisation within society as well as contrast the aspects of their theories which have different ideological roots and conclusions. The essay with then go on to conclude that whilst there were some key differences
In the beginning of the 19th century, the Industrial Revolution caused a massive economic spike from small-scale production to large factories and mass production. Capitalism became the prevalent mode of the economy, which put all means of production in the hands of the bourgeoisie, or the upper class. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels argue that capitalism centralizes all the wealth and power in the bourgeoisie, despite the proletariat, or the working class, being the overwhelming majority of the population. The manufacturers would exploit the common proletariat and force them to would work in abysmal conditions and receive low wages, furthering the working class poverty. “The Communist Manifesto” predicts that as a result of the mistreatment
The life of a 19th-century industrial worker was far from easy. Even in good times wages were low, hours long, and working conditions hazardous. Trying to fix the issue, many Europeans suggested much needed solutions to this problem. Over the course of the 19th century Europeans suggested that there should be equality between men women and social classes, that there should be a peaceful reorganization of social classes, and a revolution or a change in government. During the Industrial Revolution, as more factories were being built, more people were willing to do work as long as they got paid.
The nineteenth century was a busy time in America. Many things occurred, from the abolishment of slavery to technological advancements such as the first sewing machine. But with the Second Great Awakening and different moral values came new ideas for the government and society. The main reforms were temperance, prison, education, and women’s education. All of these have led to good advancements in society, but also have come with drawbacks.
Marx advocated revolution by the Proletariat against the Bourgeoisie to reduce income and social class inequality. However, Smith felt that the Invisible Hand and the division of labour would eventually bring the poor out of poverty, but may not entirely resolve the income inequality or equal distribution of
Hello Ashley! Both Sigmund Freud, Karl Marx, and the suffragettes all posed a threat towards the upper class men of this time. Karl Marx had theories that suggested a revolution was necessary to overthrown the wealthy male elite. Eventually, as Marx 's theories were accepted more widely upon his passing, worker 's rights were challenged throughout Europe as people began to feel fed up with how they were being treated. For obvious reasons, Marx 's ideas were a threat to the power and money of the wealthy elite class and negotiates would need to be made so that the living conditions of such people could improve before any revolt began between the rich and the poor.
It is argued that social inequality occurs because of the conflict between the upper-class and the working-class, or as Marx defines it, the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat. Based on the Manifesto of the Communist Party (Marx and Engels, 1848), the divergence emerges because the aim of the Bourgeoisie is to obtain a surplus-value that is produced by the work of the Proletariat. On the other side, the Bourgeoisie provides the Proletariat with the minimum required, such as a place to live and a minimum wage, in order to keep the society under control and avoid a rebellion. However, Marx did predict a revolt of the working-class that would eventually lead to a communist regime. When it comes to applying this theoretical approach to reality, it is evident to notice that no global revolt in regards to capitalism has occurred.
The four famously known theorists are Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, and Karl Marx. Each studied and viewed social behavior in a way they believed was the way it should be viewed; hence, they came up with different theories that categorizes society in many different aspects. Emile Durkheim was a father of sociologist who was famous for his views on the structure of society and its functions. His work was majored on how traditional and modern societies evolved and operate. Durkheim's theories were based on the concept of social facts.
Class conflict, Marx believed, was what encouraged the evolution of society. To quote Marx himself, The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one
In the Communist manifesto, a well known quote of Marx, “the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” This is introductory to the first part of the pamphlet and a conclusion to Marx’s theory about class struggle. Marx’s highly structured on how the class struggle emerges and affects the development of a society. The development of a society from the old and from the new is the result of the conflict of classes in the society.