This way the defendant and their attorney would be able to see if they actually have enough evidence to win the case in court. This would element most of the innocent people pleading guilty out of fear of long prison sentences like what Mr. Gampero did. The second thing I would change is that if the Judges or prosecutors make treats to put someone in prison for a long period of time if they do not take the plea then the case must be thrown out of be tried by a different jurisdiction. Like what happened with the OC snitch
Most criminal cases end when the defendant (the person accused of a crime) pleads guilty. Guilty pleas are usually favored by everyone involved – each side gets some benefit: A trial isn’t added to the judge’s already-busy court schedule; the prosecution gets a conviction, and the defendant gets some favored treatment, like a sentence that’s less than the one he’d probably get if he went to trial and lost. Pleading guilty comes at a cost, though. A defendant gives up a lot of important rights, like a jury trial and confronting witnesses. It also means conviction and punishment.
If the offender pleads not guilty, then there will be a trial that forms on a later date. If the offender is found guilty for the charge they will receive the harsher sentence, it is all about being honest within the federal courts, on determining the offenders
Curley’s wife had never received the letter nevertheless blamed her mother for taking the letter. She eventually realized that she needed to settle and that’s how ended up with Curley. Consequently, you are innocent till proven guilty. In the novel you can’t say she did try to seduce the men and you can’t really say she is innocent. Curley’s wife was trapped in a situation she couldn’t get herself out of.
Nobody can prove anything unless someone confesses. It is a chain reaction when one person accuses another because they then have to convict someone or they die. They refuse to accept strange occurrences, so they blame the devil for all of their misfortune. The strict religion in the town causes everyone to doubt and accuse each
False witnesses have been a problem for as long as humans have been around, from the Salem Witch Trials to the Mccarthyism times. False witnesses mess with people's lives and are a nuisance to the judicial system. They can turn a guilty verdict to a not guilty, or vise versa. It is an issue we have in the world and is something that has to be dealt with and correct to make our court system fair to the people of this world. False witnesses are not good, they are a problem is around, and they can be stopped.
Although Socrates’ demonstration was clever, it did not prove his point. I do not believe that Socrates’ response conquered the paradox, but rather looped around it and created another. I do not believe that his response to the paradox was good for a few reasons. If we assume his theory to be true, we are still left with many questions. The first problem, is that his theory does not answer the question of where or how these souls came about.
On Being Charged with the Fact. The Poor Girl Confirmed the Suspicion in a great Measure by her Extreme Confusion of Manner” (“Frankenstein” Mary Shelley). In Present times you are Innocent until Proven Guilty! “I did Confess; But i confessed a Lie. I confessed that i may Obtain Absolution; but now that falsehood lies heavier at my heart then any other sin”(“Frankenstein” Mary Shelley) In this Medieval time, it seems you are Guilty before Proven Guilty!.
Moreover, they must face evidence which is highly technical (Hostettler, 2004). They have to decide important matters, verdicts, without giving reasons about their decision (Hostettler, 2004); they can nullify a verdict even if the evidence is overwhelming (Joyce, 2013). Furthermore, juries are too expensive, prolong the length of the trial (Davies, 2015) and the guilty can walk free, while the innocent is convicted (Joyce, 2013). In addition, jurors should be representative of society, but it is not