Keeping the legal drinking age at twenty-one would mean that people would be safer than if the age was lowered to eighteen. A higher drinking age would mean that less teens would have health problems in the future. Having twenty-one as the legal drinking age has saved hundreds of lives per year. A person’s brain isn’t fully developed until age twenty-five, alcohol would affect people’s brains even more if they started drinking even younger. Keeping twenty-one as the legal drinking age would be better.
Lowering the legal drinking age to eighteen would cause major health problems in the future. Having the age at twenty-one has saved over 500 lives per year. The main cause of car crashes is driving under the influence, not phone or electronic usage of any kind. Alcohol poisoning is a leading cause of death in countries with a lower legal
…show more content…
“Many activities have ages of initiation. A person must wait until sixteen to drive, age eighteen to marry without parental consent, age thirty-five to become president and so on.” (John Carpenter) The legal drinking age has been set at twenty-one so it should stay at twenty-one. “ A person’s brain continues growing into their twenties. Drinking during that time can damage short and long term brain growth, and that damage can be permanent.” (John Carpenter)
Eighteen year olds are trusted enough to drive, can vote, and fight in the military so why can’t they drink? Teenegers will drink no matter what so why not let them do it legally? Having twenty-one as the legal drinking age has driven drinking to the riskiest of settings. If the legal drinking age was eighteen people wouldn’t feel a thrill of breaking the law to get a drink. “Lowering the legal drinking age would reduce the number of underage people who are hurt from alcohol related injuries or accidents due to fear of legal consequences if they sought medical attention.” (Tracey
Should the Drinking Age Be Lowered? Eighteen, that magical age, everyone has dreamed about turning. The number eighteen is significant in America because it is when teenagers are finally given the chance to become independent. Finally, you are no longer viewed as a child in the America, but as an adult. You can finally enjoy the same rights and privileges as other adults.
According to a survey by National Public Radio, young people can be identified as young adults at the age of 18 as the brain is fully developed and the young adults can think and make decision like another mature person. Almost each and every country has its legal voting and driving age as 18. If a person has the right to choose the president of a country and drive on the roads which requires a lot of responsibility because its the question about the safety of other people on the road as well the leader who has to lead the country in each and every possible way which requires maturity. If a person is capable of taking responsibilities like electing the president and driving then I think that the legal age to drink should also be 18 instead
“There’s No Benefit to Lowering the Drinking Age” explains, on average about eleven teens die daily as a result of drunk driving (Voas 464). When teens throw a party, alcohol is usually involved. Then once the party is over the kids have to get home somehow and they often drive themselves. When an alcoholic drink is placed in an eighteen-year-old hand decisions are made that harm them and others
According to Cdc.gov “excessive drinking contributes to more than 4,300 deaths among people below 21 in the US each year”. Lowering the LACA (Legal Alcohol Consumption Age) would just increase that
Should the U.S. Legal Drinking Age be lowered from 21 to 18 Years of Age? Alcohol is considered the drug of choice for many American youth. Statistics provide that there are more than 10.1 million underage drinkers in the U.S. with 85 percent of college students and 72 percent of 12 graders having tried alcohol. As a result, underage drinking contributes to death from injuries, increases the risk of sexual and physical assault, as well as playing a role in risky sexual behavior. However, there have been increasing debates over whether the minimum legal drinking age should be reduced from 21 years to 18 years.
Although many individuals think that teens under 21 have the capacity to handle drinking, studies found that legal drinking ages and traffic accidents found higher legal drinking ages associated with lower rates of traffic accidents. Alcohol shouldn’t be consumed by ages under 21 because it will lead to more drunk driving, higher chances of alcohol poisoning, and it lowers the alcohol consumption and illicit drug use across age groups. With restrictions, young adults have the time to mature and learn how to make better choices. According to an organization that looks at both sides of an argument, by keeping the drinking age at 21, America is maintaining a rite of passage. This rite decreases drunk driving because many respectful families explain
Over the years, there have been debates about lowering the drinking age in the United States to eighteen. People argue that if a person can fight in the military or vote in elections, then he or she should be allowed the right to drink alcohol. Others feel that it is not wise to lower the legal drinking age because the results would be dangerous. Although there are arguments for lowering the drinking age, there is also an abundance of research that proves lowering the drinking age would be destructive. The legal drinking age should not be lowered to eighteen because it will give high school and even middle school students greater access to alcohol, interfere with brain development, adult rights begin at twenty-one, and increase traffic accidents among the youth.
Alcohol seems to be an important part of daily life for many people. It's a substance associated with having fun amongst friends and family. Fortunately, certain laws help to protect us against the dangers that alcohol potentially brings upon our society. Although a section of the population argues for lowering the drinking age to 18, there have been many benefits with keeping it at 21. The main purpose of setting the Minimum Legal Drinking Age at 21 is to provide safety for the public, which should be the primary responsibility of the government.
Another organization also wanted the same idea“The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health released a report that suggested the provinces legal drinking age to be increased to 21” (2013, Pg: ½) drinking too much alcohol can harm your health especially under the ages of 21. In the U.S.A
Lowering the drinking age: risky or safe? When teenagers turn 18, they are told that they are adults and are sent into the world. They go to college, get a job, marry or join the military. They do grown-up things like vote, pay taxes and become parents, but they can 't go to the bar for a beer.
It has instead pushed underage binge drinking into private and less controlled environments, leading to more health and life-endangering behaviors by teens. If the legal drinking age was lowered, those teens would be able to drink in a more controlled and much more safe environment where they can be monitored and supervised. Then they will be less likely to harm themselves or others. The second argument that is used is that there are fewer drunk driving accidents in countries with lower drinking ages. In quite a few countries around the world, the legal drinking age is already 18.
The drinking age should be lowered, because brains are not fully developed yet, colleges should be able to regulate drinking, and this can solve problems with kids underage drinking. Despite the controversy, the drinking age should decrease for many logical reasons. The drinking age has been a debate between the ages 18 to the age of 21 for a while now. Over the years, studies have showed favors toward the age of 21.
“ [The drinking age] is unfavorable because it forces youth to consume alcohol in unsupervised places that are risky and consumption may be abused.” The idea is, if the drinking age is lowered, youth will be able to drink in open, public places that can be supervised by others. By being public, it would decrease the risky behavior seen with alcohol in private, unsupervised settings. Pomata also asserts, “The age restriction inspires undesirable activities just as the National Prohibition Act did.” Some undesirable activities that are associated with underage drinking include the making and distributing of fake ID’s.
Though people believe it would be good to lower the drinking age, we should look at the death or injury rates where alcohol is the cause, compared to the rates of accidents from people who hadn’t been intoxicated. There has been much data collected over the years showing just how much healthier and safer not only the US is, but many other countries have become since raising the legal drinking age to twenty-one. If nothing else, look at the one third of every twenty-five, thousand people that die every year due to alcohol related crashes where the victim wasn’t even intoxicated. Not only does alcohol have life changing effects on the people drinking it, but also everyone around
Why drinking age should be lowered? If one is considered an adult at age eighteen in most of the country, are they not allowed to purchase and legally consume alcohol? The minimum legal drinking age needs to be lowered, and not just for that reason. The amount of teenagers with drinking problems and alcoholism is far greater than in Europe, where drinking ages are far lower. Also, studies show that the current minimum age drinking laws have been ineffective to a high degree.