Individuals can think a lot, a moderate amount, or indeed very little about a message, and the amount of thinking they engage in goes a long way in explaining how people will be persuaded (if at all) (Wagner & Petty, 2011). ELM emphasizes the importance of attitudes because it guides in the decisions and other behaviors. With this, the theory has presented two models of persuasive routes: the central route and the peripheral route. The central route to persuasion explains that people are persuaded by thinking about the logic behind the message. They tend to elaborate a certain issue or a persuasive argument by paying attention to the facts and preferring those with the strongest logical argument.
A critical thinker will have to have ample facts to persuade the audience. Along with that, the writer must also present themselves to be knowledge about the information as well as know the audience. Critical thinking begins with the thought process of a person. A person’s way of think can be one-sided, uninformed or prejudiced. How a person lives their life can determine how they think.
The reason Rose may do this is to first put the idea in your head that certain notions need attention, and then goes into detail. Essentially, Rose is saying, “Specifically, the notions about mind and work that need to change are the long-standing notions and seemingly self-evident distinctions among levels of knowledge” (Rose). However, that sentence there is lengthy and does not flow well. The way Rose put it in the text is much more concise and clear. Although Rose’s sentence may have seemed repetitive, it was not, and in fact its second portion was complementary to the
Once the terminus a quo and the terminus ad quem of the passage have been properly established, the author will delve into the textual criticism of the text. A succinct exposure of the textual criticism will then logically lead us into the context of the text where we shall discuss the immediate context and the remote context. Having located the text within its context, we shall see how this text resonates with other passages found in the Old Testament, the New Testament and some
This writing is also called argumentative, as it backings and argues for a positive viewpoint or position. The issue at hand normally has two or more sides to it. The writer seeks to influence and convince the person who reads to agree the situation he or she has set forward. Persuasive writing emphasizes on the reader. The writer tries to change the reader’s thinking and bring it closer to his or her own way of thinking.
After conducting interviews, the interviewer is required to explain the state of the interviewee with the theory. In other words, he/she need to theorize structures and processes of the phenomenon such as why the fact happened, what kind of conditions made it happen, and which factors made it happen at the level of theories. The reason grounded theory approach was chosen was it assists the process of theorizing and categorizing collected data coherently and precisely. In order to analyze the date with grounded theory approach, at first, the date should be divided into a small group from the context and named to each group. Second, each small group will be re-categorized into some groups which have similarities.
Exegesis is a research method. Its objective is to uncover the author’s intended meaning of the text for the original readers and its significance for today’s readers. To attain this goal, the researcher is intended to employ exegetical method as his research method. 2.1. Etymological study of the word Exegesis: The word exegesis derived from the Greek verb ‘έξηγ^ομαι,.
It discusses published information in a particular subject area within a certain time period. A literature review can be just a simple summary of the sources, but it usually has an organisational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis. A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a reorganisation, or a reshuffling, of that information. It might give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations. Or it might trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates.
It is necessary for the writer to know when several words or lengthy phrases can be reduced to fewer words that mean the same thing - this is writing in taut style. A good reproduced piece of work, which might be a memorandum for instance, should be clear and conveying of the original message but effectively in a shorter form. A memorandum (or memo) is a brief and often less formal message to be transferred from one department to another. When condensing lengthy passages, it can be useful to highlight useful parts of information as one thoroughly reads and re-reads through it. All the central sentences must be recognised.