We read in our book that the central theme of Either/Or was the discrepancy between appearances and reality. Kierkegaard says “the inner is not the outer”. Kierkegaard is different from other philosophers in that he uses other authors to distance himself from the views explored. He also hides his own position behind the position of his characters. The first part of the book, Either which was written by A is more interesting than Or written by B, who was a judge named Wilhelm. The second half of the book called Or is not as popular as the first half. Instead of adopting A’s pursuit of pleasure, Judge Wilhelm advocates a life in which the individual chooses his or her actions. A’s approach to life is aesthetic, which includes the more refined …show more content…
I also think that our culture places too much emphasis on staying busy all the time, and not enough on resting. Some boredom is okay. If someone works a forty hour work week and wants to be “bored” on a Friday night, I don’t see anything wrong with that. One of the criticisms of Either/Or is that it could be a false dichotomy because it is not told that the only ways of life are those portrayed by A and B. We read on page one hundred eighty that there may be C,D,E,F and G to take into consideration as well. It is said that Kierkegaard seems to suggest that if you reject the aesthetic the only option is ethical, and vice …show more content…
It is said that Either/Or reflects the anguished position of all humanity. It is hard to pick between the two or even all of the possibilities. There is no such thing as a ‘right’ way to answer the question ‘How should I live?’ We also learn from the video that Kierkegaard was the youngest of seven and that by the time he was twenty-two all of his siblings had died except one brother. Kierkegaard mocked marriage. He thought it was impossible to have romantic, passionate love, and also be married and have children, stability, and routine. He respected both of these ways of life but didn’t believe someone could have both at the same time. We learn that Kierkegaard was in love but broke off his engagement because he thought marriage would kill the love that drew him to her. It has been said and I agree that Kierkegaard himself has had a hard time deciding between the two approaches to life himself. We read that some commentators have seen parts of Either/Or as a psychological response to his situation rather than one of philosophical interest. In the video we learn that Kierkegaard published three works in one single day once and that he was not writing for the money. I think possibly Kierkegaard himself was caught in-between choosing which life to live. It seems to me that Kierkegaard was a
These contrast further reinforce the sheer difference in the two possible side of man. Emphasing duality of ones nature and how man is made
The selections Bless Me, Ultima, The House on Mango Street, and A Midsummer’s Night Dream share the common theme of “People often make illogical decisions against reason when they ambitiously pursue a goal and are blinded from seeing reality.” In Bless Me, Ultima the characters illustrate the struggle which arises from the conflict between their personal dreams and their unseen reality. Likewise, in The House on Mango Street, the main character’s hopes and dreams for the future blinds her from seeing and appreciating her current life. Moreover, in A Midsummer’s Night Dream the characters’ actions demonstrate how love and ambition can blind people from the concerns of others and cause them to make irrational decisions. With common themes binding works of different genres and eras, it is mesmerizing to see how certain life truths do not vary, even over great times and
As a matter of fact, this world discourages and restrains individuals from achieving self-actualization by supressing critical thinking essential for one’s self identity, so that there is no disparation, thus no disputes between individuals. As demonstrated through Mildred’s yearning for a new parlor screen and her nonchalant reactions towards her husband’s attempts at initiating conversations, people do not exhibit curiosity, ambition, or passion about anything, but only possess a materialistic mind, which is a typical pathology of the deprivation of self-actualization. On the other hand, Montag’s revolt – a pursuit of change and self-realization, was deemed a crime, further proving the misery of this wretched
Boredom should not be a problem in space for astronauts because these astronauts have work to do, like ship maintenance, or research about Mars or any other planet that ship would go to. The only people that would complain about boredom in space are the incompetent people who don’t know their job. One of best reasons boredom
Kierkegaard believes that the existence of God could not be proven by reasons. However, he did not think that it was rational to believe in God, but to have faith in God. In Kierkegaard reading I disagree in his perspective because I believe that a person should have faith to believe in God and his existence. I also disagree in how he believes in faith of God, but not in God itself.
However, while they both have the same intentions, their actions conflict heavily, and situate them on opposite sides of a matter. Because of this, there is not a clear good or evil person; almost every aspect of the playwright is up to the reader’s interpretation. But, it is not impossible to make a compromise between two people about their values, even if it seems the values could not be more
Kipling’s advice to his son is to always stay true to who you are and to never put your beliefs at risk just because it’s not the popular decision. All of our choices
It is common for people in everyday society to conform to society’s expectations while also questioning their true desires. In the novel, The Awakening, by Kate Chopin, the main protagonist Edna Pontellier is said to possess, "That outward existence which conforms, the inward life that questions." In other words, Edna outwardly conforms while questioning inwardly. Kate Chopin, uses this tension between outward conformity and inward questioning to build the meaning of the novel by examining Edna’s role as a wife, mother, and as nontraditional woman in the traditional Victorian period. Edna outwardly conforms to society’s expectations by marriage.
Despite her attempts, Dillard fails to present a compelling argument in either case to make the reader want to change their current way of life. In her attempts at appealing to her ethos, Dillard establishes herself as similar to most others to try and demonstrate that anyone can pursue this life, however, this merely serves to show that, like Dillard, few people have reasons to change their life. It also serves to show that even those who want to change their lifestyle will have the same difficulties that Dillard had in leaving her previous life and ways of thinking. The use of pathos further discredits Dillard’s argument by essentially establishing the weasel as a ruthless killer and then asking the reader to adopt its lifestyle as their own. Dillard presents a weak argument in her composition and relies on her detailed language and confusing analogies to convince the reader to senselessly adopt the life of a
As a result of dealing with their guilt, these characters all experience changes in who they are. Robert Davies’ Fifth Business is a novel that investigates the quest to find the meaning of life; this helps the reader understand the theme in the novel of how appropriate approaches to coping with guilt are necessary in living a healthy life. Both enlightenment and guilt, which are thoroughly explored in the novel, forces readers to think about their own lives and educates them to refrain from avoiding their
In addition, the search for self-identity is viewed as important in today’s society. Thus, these confliction attributes lead the reader to identify Edna as morally ambiguous. Categorizing complex characters as purely good or purely evil is not one of the easiest of tasks. As a result, it is best to characterize them as morally ambiguous. In Edna’s case, she is morally ambiguous due to her romantic affiliations and role-defying actions, but both are immensely vital to Kate Chopin’s “The Awakening” as a complete whole.
However, Wharton does not leave the reader without another question and alternative answer. Despite Mattie’s passionate insistence that death is the only remedy, Wharton is clearly claiming through Frome’s rational consideration of divorcing his wife is the rational alternative to
For these three identities, Edna often struggling in the dilemma, but then, her aspirations on physical or mental are lacking. It can be regard as she is not satisfied with current situation, and, to seek the
Hence, a person should live day by day because any day might be their last. When a person is older, they want to look back on what they accomplished and not on what they could have accomplished. People do not want to look back to the past and regret that they did not take the time to pursue an opportunity. They want to look back on the things they did and be proud to tell about the things they achieved. One should spend their day living, at all times.
Some despicable behaviors lead to the lost of opportunity to exploit people’s talent. In Middlemarch, the promising futures for all people are disillusioned. Their ideals go far away from the reality. Dorothea doesn’t achieve her Saint Theresa’s dream. Mr. Casaubon dies suddenly and doesn’t complete his book.