Future of the Monarchy in Thailand after King Bhumibol Adulyadej About King Bhumibol Adulyadej King Bhumibol Adulyadej, has been in power since 1946 making him the longest reigning monarch in the world today. He is the Head of the State of Thailand, the Head of the ruling Royal House of Chakri as well as the Head of the Royal Thai Armed Forces. King Bhumibol is the world’s richest royal with an estimated personal wealth of US $30 billion. From the time he took the throne, King Bhumibol has been perceived as someone who has devoted his entire life towards the betterment of the people of the country with his primary aim being the alleviation of poverty in Thailand. An additional feather in his cap is his world record breaking number of degrees, …show more content…
Unfortunately, the Prince is known for his cruelty, corruption and lack of respect towards women and various efforts made to alter his image have been unsuccessful. This has resulted in conflicts within the kingdom and created an air of uncertainty as to who would be an appropriate successor to the throne. The second in line to the throne after the prince is the daughter of King Bhumibol, Princess Sirindhorn. She is popular among the people of Thailand and is known for her expertise in Information Technology. The problem in the monarchy’s rule in Thailand began when the democratically elected and popular government of Thaksin Shinawatra was overthrown in a military coup in 2008. As a result of which the cumulative choices made by the monarchy came into the limelight and weakened the position of the institution in a span of few years. While King Bhumibol still enjoys strong support and popularity from the people in the country, the long term viability of the monarchy as an institution has become questionable and is a matter of serious concern. Personal Viewpoints on future of the
Do you know who Hatshepsut is ? She is the daughter of Queen Ahmose and Thutmose l also known as the founder of the Eighteenth dynasty and the king of the Eighteenth dynasty of ancient Egypt . Hatshepsut was considered one of the greatest pharaohs . She considered herself as a man . She felt she had the right to rule like any man .
In what situation would it have been acceptable to name a woman as heir to the throne? In Egypt there was maybe three other women served as pharaoh and King Hatshepsut was one of them. This happens when there is no acceptable male descendant available.
Ashoka Around 2,000 years ago the people of India regained self-rule. The people of India like all countries, wanted their own design on their flag. They picked the Ashoka Chakra (BGE).
A King does what he wants no matter who or how many people oppose his
She was quick-witted intelligent and manipulative in the way a great queen could be her favorite son was Richard otherwise known as Richard the lion-hearted who was a skilled fighter and a natural leader and could eventually become king After King Henry died and she was released from prison. No one questioned her authority when she was released. she was 65 years old and she laid the law making sure everyone knew she would take no for an answer. she aided Richard now the king and made nobles and political figures take oaths of allegiance to the new king.
Considered sacred by the ancient Egyptians, the Hamadryas Baboon is distinguished from other baboons by the male 's long, silver-grey shoulder cape, and the pink or red rather than black face. Like all baboons, the Hamadryas Baboon is a large monkey with a dog-like face, pronounced brow ridges, relatively long limbs with short digits, rather coarse fur, and a relatively short tail, which in this species has a tufted tip. The male is considerably larger than the female, and has a heavy cape, bushy cheeks, and large canine teeth. While the male Hamadryas Baboon develops a silvery-grey coat, the juvenile and female are brown. Like all baboons, the Hamadryas Baboon is primarily terrestrial, but will sleep in trees or on cliffs at night.
Without being directly spoken, all who showed their presence, knew that a monarchy was not an option for this new government. They had come from the strict ruling of kings and queens in Britain, and no longer wished to have a monarchy as the head of their government. Despite the fact of their two opposing views, a
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi or as more know him Mahatma Gandhi fought and died for the independance of India, even through all the cruelty people say that the British ruling helped shape modern India, did the British really help shape modern India? While many people would agree that the impact the British had was negative, but Dr.Lavani says otherwise, Lavani says that the British Helped India with their Efficient Government admission of 500 million people(Political)(Doc 6), they also built tons of mines, canals, sewers, and roads(Economic)(Doc 10), they as well protected wildlife and ancient buildings and also built universities and museums(Social)(Doc 11 & 17). Political Dr.Lavani’s side of the Argument is that the british helped build or set in stone the creation of modern India, some positives the British brought Politicly were things like really well trained armies, and great Administration(Doc 13 & 6), but that doesn’t mean the British didn’t do anything wrong, the British had only 60 Indians in Government(Doc 2), and the British used armed forces on
In Domat’s “Social Order And Absolute Monarchy” the argument is that monarchs should stay in power and that is their divine right to rule that would keep society together, monarchs are natural and necessary form of government that society should follow. Jean is of the mindset that monarchies are one of the most effective and natural forms of government, however he mistaken to believe this. “The first distinction that subjects people to others is the one created by birth between parents and children. And this distinction leads to a first kind of government in families, where children owe obedience to their parents who head the family. The second distinction among persons arises from the diversity of employment required by society” (Domat 28).
Mansa Musa Mansa Musa was a great and very wealthy leader of Mali. He is considered to be the greatest leader that Mali has ever had. But when Mansa Musa journeyed to Mecca with 60,000 other people, was it strictly for religion, or were there other motives for his journey? Clearly, he wanted to go not just for religion. There were other motivating factors.
Genghis Khan has been accused of multiple crimes over the years, many of which forever affect civilization as we know it. These charges include hatred for eurasian societies and ineffective organization and administration of conquered territories. While accusations such as slaughter of innocents stand true, the two accusations mentioned earlier are false beyond a shadow of a doubt when factual evidence is brought up. “Taking Control” by Timothy May highlights how Mongolian civilization relied heavily on effectively organizing and managing conquered territories. Mongols never denied the fact that their civilization was small compared to others before the invasions that were conquered by the Mongols under Genghis Khan.
Maatkare who is better known as Hatshepsut for her throne name. She was one of the first female pharaohs but as well as she was considered one of the most successful. Unlike most of the pharaohs, she became a leader because her father had passed away and had no sons (in their bloodline) to inherit the leadership. She had married Thutmose II who was her half brother and only 3 years old in order for him to become a pharaoh. Due to his young age she had ruled in his name until he was at an age when he would be able to rule.
Patrick mentions “the principles of this system are extremely pernicious, impolitic, and dangerous. Is this a monarchy life England- a compact between prince and the people” (Henry and Mason, 154). Patrick question whether this new form of government will lead to a monarchy, one that will deprive or endanger
Verdict of the Trial of Genghis Khan. After the trial had taken place, I decided that Genghis Khan and the Mongols were uncivilized. During the time of the trial I learned much more of the brutality that had taken place during his reign. The barbaric attitudes and actions of himself and his followers is what led to him being found guilty of being uncivilized.
The King and Us Freedom of speech can be a blessing, and sometimes a curse. While we can say all thoughts in our minds, our words can cause serious harm to others, especially the words which contain no truth. Struggling to find a way to protect and limit the scale of freedom of speech, humans created a defamation law, in order to protect the reputation of others. Like other countries, Thailand also adopted this law, and later adapted to its cultural hierarchy. This adaptation causes the Thai legal system to have different defamation laws for ordinary people and for the head of the state, aka King Rama VI, the current king of Thailand.