He designed his own hypothesis of effective leadership and based his ideal leader on Borgia’s life. Machiavelli famously claimed that excellent leaders have to learn to be tough; they must be ready to set aside ethical or moral concerns of justice, kindness, and honesty in order to guarantee the stability of their regime. The assertion was outrageous to contemporaries, who upheld medieval concepts about divine power, in which a supreme being appointed the ruler for the sole purpose of serving people and upholding justice and law. In contrast, Machiavelli asserted that the most prosperous leaders were not those adhered to the dictates of justice, conscience or law, but those prepared to do whatever it take to preserve their own power. Such leaders, according to him, end up preserving the order of their
The strategy he followed in consulting other leaders from different ethnic background added high moral and ethical values to the empire. Cyrus spread the life of the kings Cyrus conquered their states; for example, Cyrus asked Croesus, who was one of Cyrus’s competitors, to serve as an advisor. Seeking knowledge and learning from others’ experiences are great lessons in leadership. Beside his respect for others, he was a good listener for people needs. Cyrus encouraged people to come forward if he accidentally ignored any important points.
He acted with a sense of urgency and importance in his mission and was decisive in his approach. His relationship with the people as well as the other leaders in his society was one of great respect and admiration. The King would give his own daughter to Turnus and the queen was willing to sacrifice herself for him. This relationship of trust between leaders and followers enhances a society and increases the overall cohesiveness and dedication for the group’s best
John Lewis had many ways to work for change; he protested non-violently and peacefully. At the end of his battle for civil rights, he had helped achieve civil rights, anti-segregation and voting laws for people of color. John Lewis also worked with his idol, Martin Luther King Jr., to make change for the people of America (biography). Lewis had many different ways to change America peacefully. He had a lot of marches and public demonstrations to show people the difference in treatment between blacks and whites.
He gracefully discharged his obligations and did not utilize the energy of his situation towards securing his personal stakes. He generally set the interests of the nation and its prosperity above every other interest. He never made any false promises, in fact no promises like politicians, for him it was all the way only accomplishments which is the point that made him a genuine "Leader", separating him from politicians. He generally said, “Luxury and Lies have many maintenance costs but Truth and Simplicity are self-maintained without any cost”. Simplicity would be one of the numerous ethics of Dr.Kalam that individuals would execute in their life.
Now that we have put down a foundation and understanding of Moses we can now focus on what matters the most; the leadership of Moses. Moses was many things, one of which was that he was a problem solver. Just by considering his story you see that he had a problem with problem’s popping up for him. We see that Moses did have a few anger issues as you
Great leaders understand that they don’t have all the answers, they understand that collaboration is the key to success, and they understand that a more equitable power dynamic is necessary to have continuous movement forward. The next attribute in a great leader is integrity. Integrity is of course a trait that needs to be demonstrated by everyone including managers, and as it is ranked third in the study, it is very important in the eyes of respondents. Having integrity is doing what you say, and saying what you do. It’s doing what’s right not just what’s right for the company, and means admitting
Social mission and their success laid a good foundation, but is necessary to ensure that their effects fully reflected in the economy, particularly in that part of the non-oil sector. There is a tangible lack of investment. It is necessary to increase the capacity of the economy (watch the efficiency of public investments, reduce bureaucracy and corruption). Is possible to consider Chavez as successful? He managed to grasp the real power because they upset the traditional political party system, lambasted liberalism and capitalism as such and turned the masses against corrupt political parties.
Like I have said, I have learned that by doing one’s task in well-mannered way, relationship will naturally follow. So, I ascertain that his leadership style will give positive effect of how I formulate myself as a leader in the future. Pope Francis, unlike other organizational leaders, has to govern people throughout the world and has to build relationship with the follower in global scale. So, I believe it would be tough for him to reach out his relationship where his followers are scattered all over the world, but still, he lead his group with love. His love binds and motivates people with positive purpose.
This could help enlighten Santos to retain Cruz in the company as well as further substantiate that it is not rational to dismiss Cruz just like that. If Santos will be persuaded then, the company will be able to keep a very dedicated employee. Moreover, it would also continue to benefit from Cruz’s remarkable skills, brilliant suggestions, and good work ethics. Furthermore, this will not create a negative atmosphere in the company or build uneasiness among the employees, due to a supposed unjust dismissal. Needless to say, Vinces will be able to maintain his reputation as a just leader and at the same time, keep decent relations with Santos.