The Connection Between Character and Leadership: King Juan Carlos as Case Study
The notion of having to administrate a political regime that is contrary to the beliefs of one own is the weight that current King Juan Carlos faced in the history of his throne. Despite this notion, Juan Carlos was able to implement his views of democracy into Spain’s dominated dictator political apparatus through his character and leadership; specifically he had the values of being authentic to his own beliefs of democracy. He encompassed integrity when making decisions, and was courageous in actually executing his beliefs under the supervision of loyal falangists/members such as prime minister Carlos Arias Navarro, General Francisco Coloma Gallegos and other
…show more content…
Although Juan Carlo had Arias as Prime Minister; he did not let Arias political beliefs of dictatorship influence his actions, therefore demonstrating his integrity and self-discipline. Nevertheless, Juan Carlos was put in a predicament where he had to endure an immense amount of stress due to the battle between the left and the right, and having to cope with Arias. Despite this expressive stress Juan Carlos commitment to democracy did not stop him in pursuing his purpose of reaching government reform. In fact he worked harder towards his purpose; for instance, he put a great amount of time in establishing loyalty with armed forces; as well as traveling to different parts of Spain to demonstrate his loyalty towards democratization (Preston 354). This commitment to working as hard he could represents his practice of solid values and self discipline; this in turns results in recruiting a higher amount of followers. As Bill George states, “ If you do not exercise complete integrity in your interactions, no one will trust you. If they cannot trust you, why would they ever follow you?” (George 21). This is exactly what Juan Carlos did he gained the trust of advocators and there was an increase in workers, students, and nationalists strikes for change and the …show more content…
He encompassed one of the most essential traits of being a leader, which is being authentic. This is evident in him understanding his purpose of being king; which was to bring change into the dictator political infrastructure. He practiced solid values such as integrity through demonstrating to people that he is not deviating from his purpose of bringing democracy as well as demonstrating self-discipline through adjusting his actions to meet his purpose. He established enduring relationships to ensure that people know that he cares about what they want and how he is going to do it. And lastly, he demonstrated courage through standing up against the bunker whom embraces an opposite political mindset as the one he envisioned for the future. Without authencity and courage; Juan Carlos would have failed in being an effective leader because he wouldn’t have the framework or base necessary for people in society to actually trust him. Like he said to his son, “If in this life it is as important to form and strengthen character enough to permit us to lead” (Govan 1). This demonstrates how the formation of character is imperative to leadership, in which he demonstrated through meeting the criteria of authencity and courage; and finally bringing democracy into
Another quote thats great for showing his leadership is, “It seems to be a law of nature, inflexible and inexorable that those who will not risk, cannot win.” Not only do these quote show what type of leader he was, it shows his bravery. Although he was brave he had a soft side. I can tell this from the quote I stated at the beginning of my paper. The quote read, “An honorable Peace is and always was my first wish!
He tried his best, I believe, to improve the interests of his people both by allowing the secret continuation of their religion and by making it possible for his people to continue paying their tribute to the Spanish, even as Andean population seemingly continuously declined year after year. He had to decide on whether he would increase the “taxes” that would have to be paid by each person to make up for those whom were no longer a part of their population, or begin paying more tribute by himself in means of corn, potatoes, and animals to the Spanish, which was no longer a feasible solution to this population decline and tribute demanded increase. Meanwhile, he “reflected his concern for the poor and disadvantaged among
“He who stops being better stops being good.” (https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/o/oliver_cromwell.html). These words by Oliver Cromwell show that he felt being a fierce person made you a better leader. His leadership style was strict and demanding but he was also fair. Many people hated Oliver Cromwell because he was such a harsh military dictator with a lot of power. A lot of people in the upper class did not approve of his leadership style.
As mentioned earlier how heroic our protagonist is depends completely on how willing the reader is to understand the intricacies of Perez’s village culture. It is important to note that the village of Macuiltianguis is not in poverty. Perez states his father’s store is doing well and there is no shortage of work. This evidence supports the idea that his choice to immigrate to America was not cultivated in desire for ‘dat green dough. In fact Perez continues on to say “It was a matter of following the tradition of the village…A lot of people, nearly the majority, have gone, come back, and returned…”
Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna had many leadership qualities he was literally a leader, he served as a Mexican politician and general. He significantly influenced early Mexican politics and government, he was a skilled soldier and clever politician. He gained power in Mexico, throwing out the Mexican constitution and declaring himself dictator. Santa Anna did not have a specific ideology. The federalists gave him the opportunity to come back to the country, to take power, and to defend Mexico.
He showed the true characteristics of a leader and a hero doing so by believing in equality and his men's determination to fight for their
Juana Salazar compares herself to a dolphin because she is helpful,makes mistakes,and asks for help. To begin with she was born on June 2003 also, she is 14 years old she currently attends Classical High School and is a freshman. She can speak two languages which are Spanish and English,soon she will learn how to have a simple conversation in Italian. Sadly she has no pets,so she plays the guitar once in a while as a hobby. In addition she has two parents and a little brother that live with her,she plays Minecraft and Roblox with her little brother after school.
Time went by and he had 2 losses and he needed 2 to go if it included the rivalry he has had since the beginning. They were fighting and were wrecking everything in their way. The whole country was absolute chaos. While Juan was fighting he thought about lying to his family, including his own wife. He didn’t want to die right now.
Miguel Hidalgo began the independence movement for Mexico in the 19th century. To the Mexican people, he is a symbol of freedom, equality, and hope. He was able to unite the poor people and spark the revolution against the Spanish and against the upper class. Miguel Hidalgo is a defender of human rights and is viewed as the great hero who fought for equality and justice, which would later influence other great leaders to fight for their people.
There are many things a king needs to be great. A king needs to be well-liked by his subjects to prevent being overthrown. Kings also need confidence, and substantial knowledge of the land and of the people he rules. Being well-liked and having conviction and knowledge are very important, but most of all, a king needs to be levelheaded. In order to call the important shots that impact an entire nation, a king needs a thorough thought process to reach the proper decision.
In The Prince it states “Should be feared rather than loved "if you cannot be both" in order to avoid a revolt;” (The Prince) explains that not all leaders are admired and followed by the citizens. What determines the differences of a good leader to a bad leader is just a minor change. It is just if a leader could look broadly into the world. Same with illegal immigration problem, the leader of the country should take care of the people who is benefitting from the country without any contributions, and the husband of one’s daughter. A good leader doesn’t give any excuses to which ever points made on the nation, a real leader should have a resolute opinion about how will the nation is going to be ruled.
However, he also let the power go to his head and became the absolutism ruler that the revolution had fought against. But when comparing his rule to that of the the monarchy and the national assembly, it still stands out as the best of the three for his better
He is honest, which can be seen when he accepted his lord’s judgment and took the punishment for smuggling. He has a duty to be honest even if he knows his lord will disagree with him. Another vital attribute is his loyalty, he is thankful for the opportunity to serve and will not run away from his failures. After his failed navel invasion of Kings Landing he accepted his failure and did not make excuses for himself. He is also determined, which can be seen from his learning to read.
He was an effective leader because he was incredibly persuasive, his ideas were new and he pressed them hard, and because no matter how much fire he was under he never gave up.
Orwell provides a detailed account of his experience in the Spanish Civil War as a broader fight towards a social revolution. The egalitarian revolution was one of great importance for left. While studying their decision making throughout the revolution, the Anarchists, did the best they could given the setting of the situation. The question remains; if the Anarchist revolution had been successful, would it have been a functioning model in the long-term. There were many underlying factors that led to the defeat of the anarchist goals, and the broader left movement in general.