He did not love the “forced Union” and thought that by killing Lincoln, he would be doing well for the country. In his last diary entry, he wrote, “This forced Union is not what I have loved. I care not what becomes of me.” What he meant was that he did not care what would happen to him. He just thought that he would be benefiting the South by killing the President. In conclusion, there were several reasons John Wilkes Booth killed Lincoln.
After stripping Flavus of his title of Tribune of the Plebs, he asked his father to disown him, because he had two other more successful sons, but he refused. Flavus, already disliking Caesar, only disfavored him more because of Caesar’s attempts to ruin his political career and have his father disown him, which was an insult to him. My character believes that the assassination of Julius Caesar, while horrid, resulted in a better chance of the Republic rebuilding itself out of the ashes and back to its former
Some of the people felt, The Articles of Confederation, made the national government too weak because of democracy. The Articles of Confederation maintained the principle that the national government would not hold more power than the states, which they saw as sovereign. This did satisfy the fears and questions
That doesn’t matter to him, he feels as if he will do better. Macbeth begin to feel as if the bonds and relationships were fake, so he turned against the people who supported him with little to no regret. He was solely focused on this motive of becoming king and gaining as much power as he can. For example, he ended up killing his best friend Banquo and almost killed Banquo’s son. This was all to try and prevent them from fulfilling the second part of the prophecy, Banquo’s descendants becoming king.
It’s hard to defer whether or not John Adams was an effective president because, although many historians believe that Adams was correct in not expanding the naval war with France into a conflict which saved many people’s lives, there were things that he established and believed that completely contradicted the newly established constitution. This could’ve put America into jeopardy. These things included the belief that the executive branch should stand above politics, his agreement to sign the Alien and Sedition Acts, and the fact that mostly of the people in the United States, including his own party, turned away from his ideas, which definitely did not make him the most effective president. Much of Adam’s isolation reflected a well conceived
The assassination of Alexander Litvinenko was just because of his false claims. He put himself in a dangerous place. Alexander should not have been falsely accusing the Russian President. He may have known information others did not know, but he did not show it was true. People may think he was a loyal officer, but just because some other officers made poor decisions, it does not mean they were unloyal.
Although, Thoreau does not like the way government rule however his not an anti-government. He believes the government is necessary for ruling the country, but the corrupt government is not beneficial at all because it is only benefiting people who are involved in the politics. He believes government power should come from the people and citizens should receive all the advantage than political leaders. Therefore, Thoreau thinks the current government is flawed; thus, we must create new form political system. When he mentions this statement his intentions become more clear “I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government.
Ferdinand only desired the best outcomes for nearly everything he did, and did not care about how some groups viewed him. World War I could have been held back or turned into a less severe conflict if Ferdinand wasn’t assassinated, and many deaths didn’t have to happen. Lastly, his assassination could have been avoided if different ideas were presented to him, and this definitely would have caused a better outcome than violence. Overall, Ferdinand was a good man who was just trying to do the best for his empire, and should not have been
The beginning of this time started directly after Maximilien Robespierre came to power. He tells us that is trying to form a “Republic of Virtue” when in reality he is just eliminating a lot of France 's significant history. Even keeping the days straight now is hard, after he changed our days and weeks up. And to think this was being done because it was a threat to the republic. Not to mention all of the unwarranted killing for his precious “Republic of Virtue”.
While this was taking place, the assembly were in session at the palace of Versailles. They urged the king to withdraw the troops as this might appease the rebels, but Louis was hesitant and resisted. He knew that the significant presence and the large number of the army could crush this revolt, however his will was weak and he did back down and the army were pulled back. This moment is a clear display of Louis's loss of power. He had lost any shred of authority he had left by giving in.