I’m The King of the Castle: Who Is Responsible For The Final Tragedy In ‘ 'I'm The King Of The Castle’ The novel “I’m the King of the Castle”, written by Susan Hill is set in the 1900’s in England, around an isolated and dark house called Warings. The house was passed over generation after generation before finally being passed on to Joseph Hooper. The house was standing by it self and no other houses were ear it nothing had changed about it since it was first made . It was made from dark red brick. Edmund Hooper had unhappy memories of Warings from his early childhood. His mother, Ellen Hooper died 6 years ago, so just his father had brought up Edmund by his self . His relationship with his father was really poor compared to other families …show more content…
Mr Hooper is selfish character too. The author is trying to tell the readers how alone mr Hooper feels , and his hopes for Mrs Kingshaw to see him as a suitable man tell the reader. Edmund’s father is sexually frustrated and lonely that’s why he sees Mrs Kingshaw as a pleasure for him self. Mr Hooper blames his wife for leaving him to raise Edmund alone: “I shall not allow myself to feel guilty about it. Edmund will be like any other healthy boy. I am not to blame.” He Is trying to convince him self that he is not the one to blame for Edmund’s miserable behavior. He is refusing of accepting total responsibility for their son, now that his wife is dead, could be the reason for the lack in proper parenting; teaching Hooper what is right and what is wrong and how to behave around others. Hooper’s lack of love given by his dad made him an actually psychopath that cant show love to others and made him want to hurt everyone’s feelings , just like his own feelings are hurt. Mr Hooper is even more careless to the situation between Charles and Edmund, he knows exactly that his son is a psychopath However, this does not mean that he overlooks Charles’ presence completely; he actually thinks: “We are getting to know one another, Charles, don’t you think? We are becoming very good friends.” This brief conversation Mr Hooper has with Kingshaw …show more content…
He pretends to care about Kingshaw; this means his concern for the boy is fake; This naively selfish interest in Charles could be what pushed the child to take his life. As the only person who told him, face to face, that they felt as though they could relate to Charles, and felt as though they had become ‘good friends’, Mr Hooper could have been the hero who saved Kingshaw from Edmund. However, Mr Hooper also did not know about the abuse, and did nothing to find out about it either. It is a flaw of both parents to see what they want to see rather than face the reality of the situation. This flaw means that they must eventually accept responsibility for the tragic ending of Kingshaw’s short
In this novel Mrs. Baker acts as more of a parental figure to Holling than his own parents. Mr. Hoodhood, Holling’s father is an absent parent and cares more about his business and reputation than his children. At first, when
Edmundson wanted to become a lawyer, not because he was interested in the occupation but, because it pays well. His father then retaliated by explaining that he needs to enjoy what he's doing in order to succeed in his occupation because Edmundson is only privileged for only one shot at college.
In this quote, Wes Moore, the author, recalls one of only two memories he has of his father. The first memory is when Wes’ father protected him, then in the second, Wes foreshadows a life changing entve. The loss of his father. This reveals that Wes remembers little of his father and has missed a fatherly influence in his life. Through missing his father, Wes is able to have a connection with the other Wes
The prejudice against castle people in Corrigan lead Jack Lionel to discriminate against his son’s marriage and therefore ruining the relationship between them and their family. Jack never wanted Jasper to be born and never thought about understanding David (Jasper’s dad) (245). He banished his son from the house after he told him that he loved Jasper’s mother and wanted to keep Jasper. This affected David a lot when Rosie died as she was the only person left in his life. The discrimination of the castle people ruined this family because Jack thought that his son marrying a castle women “is dirtying the family name” (245).
At the wedding, it’s a joyous occasion that is quickly thrown off as it is delivered by Hooper. The townspeople are in hopes that he will cast away the veil and join them in that momentous occasion but are deterred from this mentality as Hooper provides an atmosphere of seriousness and
Main characters of films and short stories are evolving tremendously, from their actions to their character traits. In the thriller short story “All the Kings Horses” by Kurt Vonnegut, the main character portrays himself as an excellent and intelligent individual. Reason being in the short story Kelly was placed in a really bad situation. However because of specific reasons; his actions, determination, and sacrifices he was able to get the result he wanted while being under so much pressure. Colonel Bryan Kelly, father of two and husband to one, had to play a life or death game of chess.
Nicholas Sparks once said, “I don’t know that love changes. People change. Circumstances change.” In the memoir, The Glass Castle author Jeannette Walls shows how her father Rex Walls changes with everything thrown at him as a father or four. In the beginning of being a parent Rex shares his intelligence with his children.
In the novel Bob’s parents can be responsible for Johnnies and Dally’s death because Bob’s parents were always blaming their self for his actions , and t they are right it is their fault the way Bob came out to be. In the novel it also explains why Bob was doing all those things. Randy even said “ If his old man had just belted him- just once, he might have still be alive.
How does Hill create a powerfully dramatic sense of fear and tension in this extract? In Susan Hill 's book "I 'm the King of the Castle", some of the main themes are tension and fear. Hill uses many literary techniques to create a heinous and dramatic atmosphere (following the theme of gothic literature), while still keeping a sense of dark excitement. Kingshaw 's fears and feelings are conveyed using a selection of linguistic techniques, letting the reader see deep into his thoughts.
In this quote, Wes Moore, the narrator is speaking from his house in Baltimore. Wes does not have many memories with his father because his father died when Wes was a little boy. This reveals that Wes had a difficult childhood. Wes looked up to his father because he was his protector. Wes’s only memories with his father are when he made him apologize to his mother and sister for hitting his sister and watching him die
He had continued to live on for weeks after Ellie had lied about his family’s well-being by his own choice until he had received the real news about his family. This shows how it is man’s choice to give into all the pain they
In The Glass Castle, Jeannette Walls is forced to take care of herself from a very young age. Her parents are mentally unstable, and her dad regularly turns to alcohol. She is forced to move when any problems arise, which is often--from Battle Mountain to Phoenix to the small town of Welch, Virginia. Despite all of this, Jeannette has a memorable childhood, riding around on bikes, petting cheetahs, and declaring ownership of stars. Throughout her whole life, she is consistently the only one that believes in her reckless father.
“That boy must go,” Mrs. Patterson said. “And I have the perfect plan!” “How, my dear, do you plan to get rid of that wretched boy without his parents noticing?” asked Mr. Patterson “Oh, you’ll see, Harold” Replied Mrs. Patterson.
It is obvious that Mr. Hooper is afraid of people's faithfulness to each one of the villagers, and also to God. It seems as Mr. Hooper is testing to see if the love and companionship of others is unreliable. By seeing the
His idiosyncrasy remains loving and understanding, even when his younger son returned home after many of been away with not a penny to his name. The young son showed disobedience to all the goodness his father had offered to him. The young son showed traits such as selfishness as well as being ungrateful. He had no worth for his father’s property nor did he want to work alongside his father on the family farm.