The people in charge may have argued that he was too involved and even though he never went through with the plots he deserved death. Since he had no protection from a jury or even his own input he was hung for just being involved. His name was attached to Booth’s and this made him a wanted man. This world is full of sin and corruption. Many times people are not justly judged because of this fallen world.
For example, saying that Lizzie Borden killed her parents makes sense when he/she says it, but there is a lot of evidence to prove she has done it. From the documents read, they report that a girl named Eli Bence saw Lizzie asking for a deadly poison called prussic acid, the night before the murders of Andrew and Abby Borden (Linder, 2004). Honestly, who else would she ask for poison? She totally killed her own parents! Stating that, while at one time it may have been true that Andrew and Abby Borden were alive, now we can state that Lizzie Borden murdered them.
However, she had been given doses of morphine to help calm her nerves after the murders of her father and his wife. Lizzie was seen burning a dress shortly after, claiming it was an old one that had been ruined with paint. Lizzie Borden was arrested on August 11, 1892 for the double homicide. Her trial began nearly a year later on June 5, 1893. The mangled skulls of Mr. and Mrs. Borden were unveiled in the courtroom as evidence, thus causing such a shock that Lizzie fainted at the sight of them.
She was suspected to lechery or must have done something that was very wrong, but it was not ascertain to the community what she had done. All they knew was that Elizabeth Proctor had to arbitrate to thrown her out of her house and no one knew why. This made the people of the community notice that she had done something wrong and then no one would hire her back as a
127). Today, many people still believe, for a number of different reasons, that Lizzie Borden murdered her father and stepmother and the investigations into the murders were not thorough enough and resulted in
Connor Coupanger English 102 Prof L.H. Roberts February 15, 2018 The Act of Two Murders In the short story “A Rose for Emily” by William Faulkner, and the drama “Trifles” by Susan Glaspell, the authors created two female protagonists “Miss Emily Grierson” and “Mrs. Minnie Wright” their stories are both about woman and murder. In Trifles, Mrs. Wright has been arrested and investigated for suspected murder of her husband. Miss Emily in Faulkner 's story, kills a man who she was dating.
She did try to hide it by calling the police in a sort of intense sadness, though. Mary is guilty of it because of trying to keep the blame from her. One may assume that Mary’s murder was involuntary manslaughter. The legal dictionary describes involuntary manslaughter as unlawful killing without intent which can be matched to this murder. However, Mary’s murder was from the heat of the moment.
La Fleur killed Mr. Naquin is due to the fact that Mr. La fleur did wish death upon Jake as many guest from the event heard. When one wishes death upon someone it may mean that one hates the person so much that they could hurt them or even wish them the worse , possibly even death. Finally, although some may argue for what has been analyzed , one thing one may not be able to argue is the fact that Ms. La Fleur fingerprints were found on the Mardi Gras beads which killed Mr. Naquin . When someone's fingerprints are found it usually means that they have touched or been around the person or crime scene. Which makes it very hard for Ms. La fleur to argue against being that she was the last person seen with Mr. Naquin and could possible be the last person who left fingerprints on the beads.
The society in this book seemed to be the type that followed the rules or if you didn’t the worst things were going to happen to you. Everybody makes mistake and they try to learn and move on from them but killing someone intentionally would stick with that person forever and they would never be the same. Therefore, some people debate on whether he was completely out of place for killing Beatty or did the best thing for society. Although Montag killed Beatty, many people debate over whether it was the right thing to do or not. Montag did was he thought was right according to him because Montag thought that he was protecting himself and Faber, killing him to give society a chance to change, and because Beatty did not want to live anymore.
This can make a reader feel like they are buying into societal norms, and that it is not okay with humans doing such thing since it is not always right. Ryan then explains how the death penalty is not fair to everyone, murderer that some get sentenced to death row and some do not. He questions if this penalty is really meant for closure he states “Some advocate the death penalty as necessary to provide needed closure to surviving family members who have experienced the unspeakable horror of having a loved family member murdered” (Ryan) Closure is something that is to given to every family as he explains, that many murders are not sentenced to death
I think that if there was a next time someone was yelling for help because they were being murdered that they would actually do something to help the victim. They had a good attention that if they just yelled from the window that the murder would just leave Kitty Genovese alone, but that did not happen the murder ended up stabbing her three different times. Each night after Kitty Genovese murder the Kew Gardens community is not a place to go because they never know what is going to happen at night
Marry could be held responsible for one thing though. The cops came to her house and asked her some questions that she really didn 't know about. But after the assassination the cops came again and asked her some more question that she did know but acted like she didn 't know what was going on. The cops noticed that she was acting weird and caught on to it that she really knew about it and that she helped Both kill the president. So the fact that she acted kind of silly and isn 't very good at hiding things she gave herself up.