Knights And Samurai: Similarities And Differences Of Knights And Knights

756 Words4 Pages
Knights and Samurai are both similar and different in many ways. Both groups of warriors work under the feudal system. Feudalism is where the warrior works for a lord in exchange for land. They must be loyal to their Lord. In Japan, loyalty to the lord was hereditary. This meant these relationships would last for generations. In Europe, knighthood was not hereditary. A son of a knight had no obligation to become a knight. Both groups start training at a young age and must rise to become a warrior. The training itself is similar, though those training for knighthood spend longer preparing. Measuring the similarities and differences of knights and samurai is difficult, but the differences far out way the similarities. The homes of the samurai and the knights have a different social order. According to Document A, feudal Japan had seven classes. At the very bottom were the merchants, then the artisans and trade people. About 80% of the population was made up of the next class, peasant farmers. At fourth from the bottom were the samurai. They owed loyalty to the next class, the Daimyos. These were the feudal lords. Above them were the shogun and the emperor. The shogun was a military dictator who held more power than the emperor. The emperor only held symbolic power. Also in accordance with Document A, feudal Europe had seven classes. In Europe, the lowest caste was the peasant serfs. Next were the artisans and trade people, and then the knights. They owed loyalty and military
Open Document