The Davson-Daniell Model

Knowledge is like a white cane for the ones who are blind, the scintillating sun in the middle of the day, the shining moon as the night falls and light in the darkness. Knowledge is essential to all of us as it partakes in a significant role in our daily lives from the way we act, talk, behave and so on. The knowledge we gained could prevent ourselves from doing unfavorable actions that would result in a chaotic mess or any such tragedy. People who are rich in education tend to be more curious than others who lack it, thus putting into a prestige once they have already known. They learn and would then understand what is best and what is not, which would create a well-cultured background in them. Therefore, the demands of others and his need

In Natural Sciences, people who felt doubtful tend to discover more. With previous theories that researchers found, scientists would begin to question them. Therefore, it gave a sense of doubt and scientists would undergo several experiments again to be sure. For example, the cell membrane model had undergone many changes. The Davson-Danielli model. In the year of 1935, Davson and Danielli proposed that there are proteins between the two layers of the phospholipid bilayer. Thus, creating a sandwich model towards the plasma membrane. But, later in 1966, Seymour Singer and Garth Nicholson developed the fluid mosaic model. They stated that proteins did not form a sandwich in between the phospholipid bilayer. Instead, they were embedded in the bilayer and were not separating layers. Up until this day, the fluid mosaic model had been used widely among scientists. Doubts could lead us to gain more knowledge and new research. Scientists felt confident that the fluid mosaic model is the correct model as it has been proven to be

When something has been proved and is right, we are optimistic that this something is right. Making that person unclear and would impede the gain of information in some cases. Thus it could not be reliable at all times. Next, confidence does not necessarily decrease once we know more. It sorts of depends on the context, if it is towards debate, people who are knowledgeable tend to win as they see more. If it is towards scientists, enlightened people would continuously have doubts as they tend to question and prove more things. So overall, we need to have a controlled level of confidence and