Essay On Tok Knowledge

1557 Words7 Pages

What is knowledge? Plato defined knowledge as "justified true belief" . Knowledge, “to know“, is divided in personal knowledge -“I know“- and shared knowledge -“we know“- . The latter is constructed by ideas and thoughts of people working together to reach conclusions . Without a group, a number of people that provide a particular perspective on the world, to verify it, this type of knowledge is not possible. However, there are exceptions where knowledge exists without a group to prove its validity, like new art movements, mathematics and eureka moments in natural sciences, where the role of imagination is vital and the validation from experts unnecessary. This is called personal knowledge, which is the work of a single individual. Therefore, to what extent is verification by …show more content…

Mathematics is “the science of rigorous proof”, where a formal system is applied. The basic statements of mathematical knowledge are the axioms, which must be consistent, independent, simple and fruitful. Using deductive reasoning, mathematicians create ideas that by peer review, become theorems or are considered conjectures. Without the group to accept it, the knowledge will never be considered a theorem but that does not mean it is not knowledge. For example, the Poincare conjecture. This stayed as a conjecture for 99 years because the group didn´t verify it, meaning it was not considered knowledge. In 2005 it was finally proven by peer review that after all this time, Henri Poincare created knowledge in 1904. He did so without any group to verify it, but it was not expanded and shared to the world, as it was not fully backed up. This links to the idea that there is no need of a group to create knowledge, as it can be created by a sole individual. Hence, is it possible to claim that a conjecture is knowledge as

Open Document