Shared knowledge is group perspective, it is propositional knowledge or belief produced by norms, which may be based on culture, race and gender. It is shared within a community, society or even spread around the world. Personal knowledge produces personal perspective, it is the knowledge from direct experience using our own ways of knowing. It is local to person and includes personal reflection. The word shape in this context implies affect and form.
Knowledge, both shared and personal, gives us a source of familiarity, individuality and meaning in our lives. Firstly, it is important to make a clear distinction between ‘shared knowledge’ and ‘personal knowledge’. Shared knowledge is the result of the combined information and understanding of many individuals. On the other hand, personal knowledge can be defined as the subjective knowledge of a particular individual, based on personal experiences and perspective. In this sense, it seems that shared knowledge has the capacity to shape personal knowledge to an extent.
Personal knowledge is the knowledge of an individual person, which is learned or get through experiences, practices and real life examples. For example Tom is a mechanic, he repairs cars every day and he has some special skills which can help him fix the car in a faster way, but no one but Tom knows this, so it is a personal experience; a child who don’t know if he heat an egg into a microwave oven, the egg will explode, after he put the egg and heat it up and it exploded, he learns that he cannot heat an egg with a microwave oven, it’s a life experience. Shared knowledge is the knowledge that structured, produced by more than one person. Chemistry is a subject that all of its knowledge is shared. There are many ways to access and discover
This establishes the viewpoints of the society. Personal knowledge, on the other hand, allows an individual to know and learn freely. Personal knowledge exists beyond the limits of shared knowledge. Personal knowledge allows individuals to either conform to societal thinking, or to believe against it. In both the bodies of knowledge, what is consistent is Belief.
In this essay I will be discussing on how shared knowledge can have an influence on personal knowledge. To start with, I will be discussing a situation that is ‘knowing a person’ to prove till a high extent that personal and shared knowledge have a great effect on each other including that shared knowledge can shape personal knowledge. To start with, knowing a person can fall under the two categories that are shared and personal knowledge. On one hand, personal knowledge which is gained from personal experience using intuition and instinct as a way of knowing. Equally important, if the person you know is at a deep level, for instance; a family member or a very close friend.
From the very first moment we are born, or perhaps even before that, we start gaining knowledge through using different ways of knowing. We learn from the others by absorbing shared knowledge as much as we grow our own understandings and establish personal knowledge. While shared knowledge refers to knowledge which is made of collaboration of many and hence is mostly or totally objective and widely accepted, personal knowledge is unique to each individual and is usually subjective by its nature. These two types of knowledge exist in parallel and they often influence each other. In addition, shared knowledge can experience advance and change over period of time, and personal knowledge may be influenced accordingly.
Each individual knower gains knowledge through the ways of knowing reason and emotion (amongst others); these ways of knowing shape and are shaped by our perspective. More often than not, the knowledge that we pursue has been given to us by another knower, especially in areas of knowledge like history; in this case the previous knowers perspective also shapes our pursuit of knowledge. Thus, in areas of knowledge where shared knowledge is pivotal we draw upon a shared perspective, not just that of the individual knower. Due to perspective affecting knowledge in such a magnitude of ways, it is essential in all areas of knowledge. Through exploring the pursuit of knowledge in three different areas of knowledge: the arts, history and the natural sciences, it becomes apparent, that although to different extents, perspective is essential in shaping each.
Does knowledge only add value to our academic pursuits, or can it enriches our lives in all different aspects? Can knowledge be purchased or is it built through experience and input? Humans have been haunted by these rhetorical questions that define our lives. In my essay, there are two kinds of knowledge; subjective and objective. Subjective knowledge is based on personal perspective, assumptions, or beliefs.
The use of personal knowledge, whether it be abolition or implementation, influences the creation of shared knowledge. Therefore, the value of knowledge is not only established as its application, but the lack thereof (Serpa, Gabriela). Knowledge, juxtaposed to fact, does not need to be the truth. In the 17th century, everyone knew that
“Without application in the world, the value of knowledge is greatly diminished.” Consider this claim with respect to two areas of knowledge.” Answering this question requires the exploration of the initial statement: ““Without application in the world, the value of knowledge is greatly diminished.” This exploration will lead to the acceptance of this initial statement as being valid but not in many cases. The two areas of knowledge that shall be used throughout this essay to support my claim are: mathematics and the social sciences. The role applied knowledge plays in mathematics and social sciences is crucial because it has resulted in numerous discoveries to occur, most of which has benefited man-kind. Before I get more into depth with