From ancient smoke fires to modern day tweets, the evolution of communication has been a scintillating journey, possible only due to the constant improvements in technology. These changes have not only changed the way people live their personal lives but also their social lives. Modern day political revolutions have become successful owing to the modernized communication technology. This was evident in the case of the Arab Spring (2015) and the role of social media in highlighting the tyranny and oppression of the authoritarian regimes.
In this paper our focus will be on the study of evolution of the way people communicate. We will use Kuhn’s idea of paradigm shifts and apply it in this case. However, we do believe that not all changes are
…show more content…
Kuhn saw revolutions as paradigm shifts in the society. “A Paradigm is made up of the general theoretical assumptions and laws and the techniques for their application that the members of a particular scientific community adopt.” A paradigm is characterized by what he calls a period of normal science. With the course of time, problems begin to accumulate and there comes a time when the existing knowledge is not able to answer the questions raised by science. This is the point of crisis and is followed by a revolution. The characteristic of a revolution is that it leads to a paradigm shift. Kuhn defines paradigm shift as something that can be “popular or not so popular shift or transformation of the way we humans perceive event, people, environment and life together. I can be national or international shift and could have dramatic effects- whether positive or negative- on the way we live our lives today and in the future.” The shift to a new paradigm moves us to what Kuhn calls a new normal science and the process continues. (Chalmers, …show more content…
Such as books helping in educating themselves but being very selective to the kind of text they were exposed to. Newspapers acted as a public forum for debates and sharing of information. Whereas Radio helped in creating a unified national identity for masses and at the same time acting as a source of entertainment. Whereas Internet created a more anonymous and decentralized form of media, out of the control of government. Thus, communication evolved over time with technological innovations and will also be experiencing the same in the coming
With social networking and social media widely available to almost everyone in the world today, they are still not strong enough for spreading social movements to start revolution. Malcolm Gladwell argues that strong social movements, for example the civil rights movement, require strong ties in both the participants and hierarchical organizations whereas social networking websites has weak ties and lacks organization. Gladwell supports this by saying, “activism succeeds not by motivating people to make a real sacrifice but by motivating them to do the things that people do when they are not motivated enough to make a real sacrifice. ”(p.
The revolution is when someone stands up for what they believe in and takes action to make change happen. There are numerous amounts of ways to go about creating change a few examples are, war,
Many activists nowadays use social media to spread their message and get people to join their cause, but will it actually go anywhere? Malcolm Gladwell answers this question in his article “Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not be Tweeted,” where he discusses the impact of social media on the ability of a revolution to actually make any change in society. Gladwell’s view is that social media, while useful in many ways, will never be able to effectively start and maintain a revolution. He presents a convincing, well written argument that plays on the logic and emotions of the readers, effectively pulling them in and persuading them to agree with his points.
For example, the social social structure of social media is weak, loose connections and not hierarchical. In contrast, the social structure of traditional activism such as the sit-ins and protests are characterized by strong, high risk strategies, and hierarchical. These systems results in very contrasting characteristics and shows that there is a shift from protests that happened through traditional protests and current 21st century social media. It should be noted that both, social media and traditional activisms are in response to a “fever”. Traditional structure of activism is illustrated through the segregation of the South in the 1960’s while social media structure is illustrated through Facebook and Twitter responses to raise money for Darfur or Save Sameer.
Revolution, by its very definition, represents change. Change is an inevitable, unstoppable side-effect of the passage of time and human innovation. In the 18th and 19th century, it was this innovation and ingenuity that fueled the fire of the Industrial Revolution in America. Great men, immigrants and Americans alike, created a golden age of technology and industry, thrusting the country onto the world stage of business, economics, and politics. America was no longer sustained by agriculture and the farmer, but by the never tiring steam engines, machines, and the cheap labor of immigrant workers.
A revolution is a large-scale rebellion with the intent to change or get rid of the current political system. The American Revolution was a fight to be free from British rule. People were tired of being controlled. The colonists of America wanted to create their own government where they could get what they left Europe for. While some may argue that the American Revolution did not change life for minorities, the American Revolution changed the political, economic, and social atmosphere and set the stage for future change.
The reporters in the early 1900s had to be very detailed and descriptive in order for people to know what they were talking about. Today, we have televisions that broadcast all of the news stories. Many Americans sit in front of the TV every day for entertainment. Now we have everything we need right around us. The TV has a major impact on our society.
For this task I am going to discuss theories of communication which will be formatted in a booklet. I will also explain Argyle’s communication cycle and Tuckman’s group interaction. Argyles communication cycle When communicating with one another people must come to terms by trying to have an understanding of what the other person is trying to say. Communication is a circular process in which each person must have an understanding of one another’s viewpoint, they must also make sure that they are being understood.
n today’s society the internet plays a huge role in the everyday lives of many people, therefore many individuals’ main form of communication is over sites like Facebook, and twitter. In Malcolm Gladwell’s essay, “Small Change, Why the Revolution will not be Tweeted,” he explores the different methods used by activists nowadays versus those used by the activists in the 1960s. Gladwell argues that social media is not an effective tool to initiate revolutionary movements or any change at all for that matter, based off its weak ties formed over different social networks. Gladwell illustrates multiple cases of protests and adds that without the assistance of social media, these protests were stronger, prearranged and based off deeper emotional ties. Throughout the article Gladwell continuously returns to the Civil rights movement and why it was effective.
American Revolution While reading the article “The American Revolution” and watching the video “making a Revolution”, I learn that revolutions have many different interpretations but some people though it is just a change of government. Revolution is not a change of government but it is a fundamental change in the society and social relationships. Revolution is not a simple thing. The Americans in the 1760s, 1770s were ripe for the revolution. At that that people loved to be English.
In the generation of technology and innovation, the creation of social mediaattract a vast number of people world wide. Aside from the basic necessities of living it may also considered as one of the most important belonging of an individual in this day and age. Primarily because of its accessibility to communication, information, education, and entertainment. Social media offers several kinds of Social Networking Sites (SNSs) such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, Gmail, YouTube, and among other things, which enable the users to communicate and participate to broader range of issues and events worldwide.
Web 2.0 is a popular word in the last decade. It includes blogs, photos and files sharing systems and networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter. These media have already changed our way of communications. And they have great impacts on other aspects of our lives. They also present great power in political campaigns.
In conclusion, political impact on social media is huge and obvious. Social media platforms is substituting the traditional formal news media which has restrictions on the news and information they share especially in closed societies. Governments of closed societies are facing a problem because the government cannot control the news and the information shared on the internet which diminish the government authority to control their citizens. Lack of control on internet has made social media a platform for activists in politics and human right
The world today is overflowing with technological gizmos which have greatly affected the lives of people. People have become overly dependent on technology. The technology seems to have control over our lives. Over the last decade, it has done nothing but become more advance from day to day. Gadgets such as computers, smart phones, and television have been invented over time to make our lives easier and more convenience.
Social media was developed to link people to the world and is an effortlessly convenient method for communication. Due to this, people are able to get in touch with just about anyone from all over the world and it no doubt has an incredible amount of influence on our lives. However, not all of it may be positive. Almost everyone is aware of how social media impacts us on a micro scale, but what about the influence it has on a macro level? Interestingly enough, it has taken a tremendous toll on politics.