Kurt Lewin
Kurt Lewin and his colleagues did an experiment in 1939 on leadership decisions and identified three different styles of leadership. These three styles, mentioned below revolve around decision making.
1. AUTOCRATIC
An autocratic leader takes decisions without consulting others in the team. This causes the highest level of discontent in his sub-ordinates. This style of leadership works when there is no need for input for the decision to be made. The motivation of the people is unruffled irrespective of being involved or not involved in decision – making to carry out subsequent tasks/actions.
2. DEMOCRATIC
A democratic leader involves the people in the process of decision-making. Although the final decision to be taken depends on
…show more content…
Laissez – Faire works best when people are capable and motivated in making their own decisions, and where the requirement for a central coordination is nil or close to nil.
After identifying the above mentioned theories, we followed the KURT LEWIN theory of leadership as it is most widely used and covers the broad range of leadership styles.
Item Writing/ Test Construction
After going through the literature review, item writing was done for the desired test. Initially a set of 24 items were made - eight statements each corresponding to a particular leadership style was penned down. Following is the list of these 24 items:
1. The final decision making in my team is mostly done by me
2. I try to take in account opinions of one or more employees while taking a decision
3. I use majority voting as a method of taking an important decision
4. Consulting others can be time consuming, so I prefer not taking opinions of my team members while taking a decision
5. I appreciate varied ideas and inputs coming from my team members for an upcoming
…show more content…
Validity analysis is either done to check for internal validity or external validity. There are many ways to measure validity. For this particular test we used factor analysis to determine the validity.
Factor analysis
A Varimax Rotation was performed to check for correlation between variables and the factor. The following results were obtained from the test. Figure 4: Rotated Component Matrix Response Analysis
Additionally, the responses were also analyzed to determine the type of leadership style that was exhibited by various people. The response for each person was segregated according to the three styles i.e., Democratic, Autocratic and Laissez Faire. Average of the response score for each style per person was calculated and based on the highest average score; the leadership style of each person was assessed. Figure 5: Response Analysis
The responses received can be tabulated as below. Out of the 51 people who responded, majority people follow ‘Democratic’ leadership style. References
https://www.statsoft.com/Textbook/Reliability-and-Item-Analysis
Some may say this is the least productive form of leadership. They don’t offer any type of guidance and the group members will be the ones making all the decisions. There is often a lack of motivation in the group and no clear defined role. The last form of leadership is the Participative or Democratic leadership. These types of leaders are usually the most effective because not only do they offer guidance, they also allow and encourage participation from the members.
Leadership Self-Assessment The definition of leadership is, “the process of influencing people to accomplish goals,” (Huber, 2014, p.4). There are three main leadership styles according to Clark (2004), autocratic, democratic, and free reign. The results of the leadership style survey showed that I have a democratic leading style (Clark, 2004). In democratic leadership, the leader helps to facilitate discussions and the decision making process (Huber, 2014).
Researchers are inclined to believe that this leadership style is usually the most effective, since its benefits far outweigh any potential costs. Increased followers’ productivity, satisfaction and entanglement are the usual consistent output that arise when adopting a democratic
The way in which a leader selects their style of leadership is predominantly motivated by their underlying priorities and motives concerning the position at hand. These priorities are linked to the goals that the leader themselves wishes to accomplish in their position, but are often influenced by a variety of factors that are derived from two main concerns, the overall well-being of the institution under the leader’s administration and the approval of the people within that institution. The relationship between public approval and the well-being of the institution is often dichotomous in nature, which results in the leader having to make decisions that gravitate towards one side of the spectrum. This conflict between what is good for the institution
The styles, by name and brief description alone, will resonate with anyone who leads, is led, or, as is the case with most of us, does both. Coercive leaders demand immediate compliance. Authoritative leaders mobilize people toward a vision. Affiliative leaders create emotional bonds and harmony. Democratic leaders build consensus through participation.
Online Assignment Submission Birmingham Business School Student ID Number: 1614257 Programme Of Study: B.Sc. Business Management Module: Fundamentals of Leadership Assignment Title: “Choose a style of leadership that you think would be most suited to you. Using a leadership case which fits that style (leader can be from any field you wish), critically discuss its nature, dynamics, what makes it effective or ineffective, and how it fits in today’s world (and your culture); discuss how it could influence your future actions/ career.”
In spite of the fact that’ leadership analysis’ is the art of breaking down a leader into basic psychological components for study and use by academics and practitioners, a sound leadership analyses
" Leadership is the ability of a superior to influence the behavior of subordinates and persuade them to follow a particular course of action." - Chester Barnard Max Weber 's Theory: Types of Leadership In Max Weber 's theory, he wrote about three types of leaderships: Bureaucratic, Charismatic, and Traditional. Weber was one of the first of the theorists to recognize that leadership itself was situational in nature, and that effective individuals needed to move dynamically from one type of leadership style to another to remain successful. 1] Bureaucratic Leadership "Bureaucratic administration means fundamentally domination through knowledge." Bureaucratic leadership is based upon fixed official duties under a hierarchy of authority, applying a system of rules for management and decision-making.
This model states that in this 21st century, it is impossible to rely on one management style to fit all situations (Educational-business-articles.com, 2016). In other words managers and leaders must be flexible, in order to get the best result out of their teams and individuals. In addition, this theory allows management and leadership to be able to identify and accurately diagnose the situation and vary employees’ behavior accordingly to the situation (Yukl and Mahsud, 2010). This will enable management and leadership at CIBCFCIB to select appropriate types of leadership behavior for each type of situation. Moreover, another impact that this theory has on organizational strategy whereby Charismatic leaders at CIBCFCIB can minimize various types of behaviour by increasing competent employees.
Vugt et al. (2004) stated that in autocratic leadership style, employees are not involved in decision making, it is only leaders who decide what to do and how to do. While in democratic leadership, leaders allow employees to involve in decision-making process. Their involvement can be participative or consultative. In lassies-faire style of leadership, Leaders don’t exercise their control over employees and employees have freedom that they can do what they want without any hurdle.
Laissez Faire Leaders are ones who choose not to intervene and will allow the group to make decisions independently. This style can happen automatically and will result in a loss of group direction if the leader is inadequate. Lewin (1985) found that when subjected to this style of leadership, group members were inclined to be aggressive towards each other and gave up easily when mistakes occur. In this style of leadership, the characteristics adopted by the leader depends fundamentally on how favourable the situation
Bass and Avolio (1993) pointed out that leadership style is based on behavior areas from laissez-fair (no leadership) to participative (take inputs from subordinate but ultimate decision making with the leader) through transactional leadership (which depends on reward system and punishments) to transformational leadership (which is based on inspiration and behavioral charisma) and ultimately Autocratic leadership (absolute power on decision making). The researcher selected above approach since it has been developed recently and efficiently demonstrated through research findings. The various components are further elaborated below; 1. Laissez-fair Style Laissez-fair leaders are characterized as an avoidant leader who may uninvolved with their subordinates. As per Mondy and Premeaux (1995), these leaders let group members to make all decisions.
Experienced and trained employees that require little or no supervision falls under the laissez-faire leadership style. This leadership style affects a group success in that if the group is doing something wrong there is no feedback from management to make corrections since management do not directly supervise them and would led mistakes being made continuously. ● Autocratic- This leadership style managers makes all decisions with the input of others.
If the behavior theory can identify the key determinants of leadership, people can actually train to become a leader. This is the premise of the management development plan. There are many different types of behavioural leadership styles. Each style suggests that the leadership role is based on the leaders’ concern for the people being led and the level of achievement that needs to be
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the democratic leadership style, the characteristics of a leader, work environment, and the different theories associated with this style leadership. Democratic leadership is a type of leadership style that incorporates the collaboration of the entire group, enforces interdisciplinary teamwork, and is relationship oriented (Huber, 2014). Practical leadership characteristics elaborated on include self-awareness and emotional stability, motivation, innovative, flexible and visible, workplace culture awareness, and collaboration (Huber, 2014). The theories discussed include transformational, Fiedler’s contingency, and Hersey and Blanchard’s tri-dimensional leader effectiveness model (Huber, 2014). Overall,