ipl-logo

Lance Worthington's Case Against Capitol Records

155 Words1 Page

Despite selling two million copies of his Debut Album, and signing a Recording Contract with Capitol Records on June 15, 2007, Lance Worthington tax returns from the IRS revealed that he lost quite a bit. Lance thinking it was not fair that the Record Company kept so much of his earnings, decided to hire, a prominent music Attorney with a Shark-like reputation Robert Bergman. Worthington represented by Bergman all the way to the supreme court won the case against Capitol Records. All artists and musicians can thank Worthington for his brave stance against record companies, and instrumental in changing intellectual property rights and long-standing Record Company practices. Consequently, Worthington formed his own independent, and successful

Show More
Related

  • Case Ten Associates V Mccutchen Fla

    1265 Words  | 6 Pages

    The violation of statutory provisions by a landlord can qualify as a proximate cause for injuries to tenants in the case the surrounding environment was insecure and there was clear knowledge of intrusions into the given residential area. Ten Associates v. McCutchen Fla. App., 398 So.2d 860 (Fla.App. Ct. 1981). The landlord was legally obligated to positively respond to the plight of the tenants as their lease agreement put him responsible for any required repairs within the common area. The tenants, including Parker, had made numerous attempts to inform him of increased frequency of intrusion due to a broken deadbolt lock that he was mandated, according to the provisions of the statute, to promptly repair.

    Read More

  • State Of New York V. Jorgensen Case Brief

    1680 Words  | 7 Pages

    People of the State of New York v. Jennifer Jorgensen was criminal court case that went to the Court of Appeals in New York. Judge Pigott gives his/her opinion. Jennifer Jorgensen was 34 weeks on the date of the crime. Defendant was under the influenced of both drugs and alcohol. Jorgensen was driving under the influence on Whiskey Road in Suffolk County.

    Read More

  • Case Study: Gideon V. Wainwright

    325 Words  | 2 Pages

    Gideon V. Wainwright 372 U.S. 335, 83 S. Ct. 792, 9 L. Ed. 2d 799 (1963) is the case I have chose to brief. According to US courts website “Clarence Earl Gideon was an unlikely hero. He was a man with an eighth-grade education who ran away from home when he was in middle school. He spent much of his early adult life as a drifter, spending time in and out of prisons for nonviolent crimes. ”The Petitioner within the case was Clarence Earl Gideon.

    Read More

  • The Case Of Timothy Ivory Carpenter Vs United States

    364 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the case of Timothy Ivory Carpenter V. UNITED STATES Did the government overstep its bounds in Detroit without getting a probable cause warrant, and did the government violated the 4th amendment of Timothy Ivory Carpenter? The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,but upon probable cause, the police have the right to searched, and the persons or things to be seized. That is the 4th amendment. So what are the facts of the case then? (“United States v. Carpenter.”

    Read More

  • Richard Wright's Rights: The Rights To The Streets Of Memphis

    179 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the Rights to the Streets of Memphis there is a boy named Richard Wright who lives with his mom and brother. Richard 's dad also lived with him but he left which caused Richard 's mom to have fiancial issue. For having finanial issue Richard 's mom got a job in addition Richard got responsibilities to the store and get food. When Richard finishes shopping for food, he gets surrouned by bullies and gets beat up and everything gets taken. He arrives to his apartment and tells his mom what happened to him, Richard was surprised to the responce his mom gave him.

    Read More

  • 1971 Washington Court Case Study

    379 Words  | 2 Pages

    The conduct of the defendant’s in the 1971 Washington Court of appeals case, State v. Williams, while neither advisable nor necessarily admirable, was justified given their valid concerns about losing possibly losing custody of their son if they sought medical help due to their Native American heritage. Walter Williams and Bernice Williams made the fateful decision to not take their 17-month old son, who was thought to only have minor tooth-ache, to the hospital due to concerns that such hospital visit would result in them losing custody of their son. Unfortunately, for the co-defendants, their son’s illness was much more severe than initially thought and their decision not to seek care resulted in both the son’s death and a manslaughter conviction

    Read More

  • Montgomery's Trial: The Miller V. Louisiana Case

    375 Words  | 2 Pages

    On November 13, 1963, 17-year-old African American Henry Montgomery shot and killed a Caucasian Sheriff Deputy named Charles Hurt in a park in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. This came to be known as Montgomery v. Louisiana. At Montgomery’s trial, a jury convicted him of murder and he was sentenced to death. In January 1966, the Louisiana Supreme Court annulled this ruling after finding that Montgomery did not receive a fair trial due to public prejudice. The jury then returned a verdict of “guilty without capital punishment” which is an automatic sentence of life without the possibility of parole (Montgomery).

    Read More

  • Stanley Tookie Williams Case

    728 Words  | 3 Pages

    This case is about when a man named Stanley ‘Tookie’ Williams tried to gain executive clemency from the governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger. In the case he was tried for being accused of murder using a shotgun. When Williams was being arrested there was a twelve-gauge shotgun shell found at the crime scene while there was an investigation going on at the Brookhaven motel. This shell was then use against Mr. Williams in the murder trial against him stating that about 5 a.m. on March 11, 1979, he broke into the Brookhaven motel and killed Yen-Yi Yang and his wife who was Tsai-Shai C. Yang who were both immigrants coming from Taiwan. The accusation comes because of the shotgun found in Williams’s possession and he took their cash that

    Read More

  • The Case Of Thurman Vs. Torrington

    482 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thurman V Torrington is about a wife whom has suffered from many years of abuse and harassments from her husband. Throughout the many years of this abuse Mrs. Thurman has called out for help in which she never received. Even though her husband was arrest once it never ended until it was too late.   What is Abuse? It is the hurting of one mentally, physically, emotionally, and verbally.

    Read More

  • Case Study: Moncrieffe V. Holder

    1033 Words  | 5 Pages

    In 2013, the Supreme Court case Moncrieffe v. Holder refuses a Board of Immigration Appeals to removal from the United States of a lawful permanent resident based on a long term criminal conviction related to sole possession of small amounts of marijuana. The case finally made it all the way to the Supreme Court, which is considered a rather technical question of the interpretation of the U.S Immigration laws. Local police departments have long been accused of profiling Hispanic, African-Americans, and other minorities of race in law enforcement activities, including run of the mill traffic stop. Critics fear that immigration enforcement by state and local authorities will lead to increase of racism. Many Americans have shown concerns with the implementation of racist discrimination of the U.S immigration laws by state police agencies and local authorities.

    Read More

  • Tycorion Davis Research Papers

    372 Words  | 2 Pages

    Charged in the murder of a local boxing legend, Tycorion Davis, 18, was arrested after a Crime Stoppers tip helped to put him behind bars. Former boxer O 'Neil "Supernova" Bell died as a result of a random street robbery, and police are seeking four men accused of his murder. The robbery occurred in southwest Atlanta after O 'Neil Bell stepped off a bus, right before the day of Thanksgiving. As a result of the robbery, Bell died when he attempted to fight back, and they left another person injured. Investigators of criminal law have called it an opportunistic crime, and police put out surveillance footage to solve the case.

    Read More

  • Guilty: The Case Against Ronald Cotton

    57 Words  | 1 Pages

    If it wasn’t for DNA, Ronald Cotton would been convicted and locked up for a crime he didn’t do. The case against Ronald Cotton was one of many that involved African Americans, for there were approximately 200 African Americans who were exonerated after spending an average of 14 years in a correctional facility (“DNA Exonerations Nationwide,” 2016).

    Read More

  • The Dred Scott V. Sandford Case

    442 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Dred Scott v. Sandford case had the greatest impact on Race Relations in America because it created a legitimate definition of the citizenship. Scott, a former slave, stated that because of his occupancy in a free state, he is a free man. The other side argued that Scott was still a slave and according to the fifth amendment, no person (master) can be deprived of their property. The initial impact of the case was in favor of the slave owner but this decision was overturned by the adoption of the thirteenth and fourteenth amendment. The thirteenth amendment ended slavery and the fourteenth amendment granted citizenship to everyone born or naturalized in the United States included former slaves who had been freed after the Civil War.

    Read More

  • Tom Robinson Case

    1249 Words  | 5 Pages

    Riya Nigudkar Mr. McMahon Literature and Writing 1 February, 2018 Tim Johnson’s Affiliation with the Tom Robinson Case It is The Great Depression, and an innocent black man has been accused of raping a white woman, nothing new. The novel, To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, takes place in Maycomb, Alabama during The Great Depression. The novel covers the years where Boo Radley took over the Finch kids’ childhoods, and Atticus Finch, a respected lawyer, defends a black man. Scout and Jem, spend their years entangled in stories surrounding a man named Arthur “Boo” Radley by using their free time doing anything to see him in person.

    Read More

  • Brady V. Maryland Argumentative Essay

    390 Words  | 2 Pages

    The duty of any criminal prosecutor is to seek justice. A conviction is the end of justice being served prior to sentencing; however justice cannot be served if an innocent person is found guilty. Even though the prosecutor(s) are there to represent the public and has the duty to aggressively pursue offenders for violations of state and federal laws, they shall never lose sight or their own moral compass of their main purpose is to find the truth. In the pursuit of truth, the United States Supreme Court has developed or made rulings in reference to several principles of conduct which have to be followed by all prosecutors to assure that the accused person(s) are allowed the proper procedures and due process of the law granted by the 14th Amendment.

    Read More

More about Lance Worthington's Case Against Capitol Records

Open Document