LAND TENURE IN BOTSWANA
Land tenure refers to the legal or conventional relationship among individuals or groups of people with respect to land. Tenure defines the property rights that are held in a particular land that societies ought to act on. They specify the means for the grant of access to the right to use, control, transfer land and also the associated responsibilities and limitations. Land tenure systems basically determine the scope of use, user, time of use and conditions of use of particular resources. It is therefore plays an important part in the social, political and economical structures. It involves several dimensions, involving the social, economic, political, institutional, lawful and technical aspects into the open to be
…show more content…
Also, even though the land is for the citizens of the country, its ownership is with the state. In Botswana, the indigenous tenure systems that existed since pre-colonial times have over the years been relatively well integrated with a modern and democratic system of land administration (Adams, Land tenure policy and practice in Botswana; Governance lessons for southern Africa). The Tribal Land Act and Land Policy of Botswana have been bringing about careful change, responding to specific needs to accomplish innovation to the pre-existing land tenures. The country continues to adapt its administration of customary land based on the rights and values to a rapidly urbanizing economy and expanding land market (Adams, Land tenure policy and practice in Botswana; Governance lessons for southern Africa).Below is a description of the tribal land tenure before and after independence to the present time to appreciate how it has evolved over the years to affect investment in real …show more content…
Great change has occurred in Botswana since 1966 in all sectors of the economy. Great developments and improvements in the political, administrative, social and economic setups have taken place. The nation accepted four national principles of democracy, development, self reliance and unity. In this case, land administration became a bedrock block to facilitate the principles (Mathuba, 2003). The changes in land administration were influenced by various factors, the most central being the new structures introduced by government. These structures included a new state president, cabinet and parliament as well as a remodeled judiciary and the enactment of the Tribal Land Act in 1968 which established the land boards. All the powers of the Chiefs were transferred to the land boards to make them custodians of tribal land. Nine land boards started operating in 1970 (Adams, Land tenure policy and practice in Botswana; Governance lessons for southern Africa). As the custodians of land, the Land Boards functions include the allocation of land; imposing restrictions on the use of land; authorising change of use and transfer; and the resolution of land disputes in their
The year after legislature voided the land grant and stated that all rights and ownership of that land was considered invalid. John Peck purchased land in this territory in 1800 and in 1803 he re-sold this land to Robert Fletcher and stating that the previous sales of the land were legal and legitimate. Fletcher created this case with the claim that Peck selling this land to him was illegal and against the law. The court ruled that Peck selling this land was legal and legitimate claiming that the court could not declare contracts from previous legislative acts invalid and was
But when they got their own land, they really became “farmers” this time. In the other way, this policy directly increased the average earnings for every farmer. (Sowards)Also, this policy made farmers felt more confidence for their future life since they have their own land, they don’t need to worried about lost job based on how much they plant, instead, they can concentrate on how to plant crops more productive. Another policy made by the government that helped the progress on American farmers ' individual opportunity on land distribution was the Dawes Act in 1887. The Dawes Act is an act that the government directly took over Indians ' land and divided into allotments for the Indians.("Dawes”)
Fishes don’t swim in oil What happens when you force a fish in oil? it dies. Fishes live in water, not in oil. So as the Lubicon Cree.
I believe that Everyone is allowed to vote and own land. Here in the United States everyone is allowed to vote and own land. A lot of people back then weren't allowed to vote back then but know everyone is allowed to vote and own land. For example “ The franchise is open to all me who are of citizen birth by both parents” (document B). Back then you can only
I agree with all that you have stated above. I also found that republican agrarianism was Jefferson 's view of a nation of small family farms grouped into rural communities. Jefferson believed that a nation full of farmers, each only dependent on themselves for livelihood, would show the concern for the community good that was essential in a republic. This is exactly how it gave America uniqueness and a new destiny. I also read from the text that expansionism had a few downfalls to it.
In the article “The Hunger for Indian Land in Andrew Jackson’s America” written by Anthony F. C. Wallace, the treatment of Indian tribes and land in the Jacksonian Era is discussed. This purpose of the article is to explain the reason for Indian removal that occurred under Andrew Jackson’s presidency. The thesis of this article is that Americans kicked the natives off of their land to expand America's cotton industry. In Wallace’s first point he explains Andrew Jackson's reasons for removing the Indians from their lands were for his personal interest rather than for the good of the people.
One of the tribes in Georgia was the Cherokees. The Cherokees created the 1827 Cherokee Constitution which recognized their sovereignty (Lecture 14). The Cherokees restructured their government and declared that they were a sovereign nation and could not be removed from their lands (Lecture 14). Georgia was infuriated by this and responded by extending its jurisdiction over the Cherokees (Lecture 14). The state annexed the Cherokee land and abolished their newly formed government.
Throughout the book, Changes in the Land, by William Cronon, ecological changes in colonial England are discussed, analyzed, and elaborated. The first part of the book, Looking Backward, talks of many comparisons between Henry David Thoreau and his outlook on his Concord home to William Wood’s perspective of New England. Through these comparisons, the ecosystem of New England is described, along with how the Europeans and the Indians interact with each other, which in turn affected the eventual outcomes of the ecosystem. The second part of the book, The Ecological Transformation of New England, speaks of how the Indians were reserved with their land and resources, never using more than they needed nor more than they knew they had. However,
Free Land In 1862 the U.S. Congress passed the Homestead Act. This law permitted any 21-year-old citizen or immigrant with the intention of becoming a citizen to lay claim to 160 acres of land known as the Great American Prairie. After paying a filing fee, farming the land, and living on it for five years, the ownership of the land passed to the homesteader. People came from all over the world to take advantage of this opportunity.
The land grant universities in the United States have a rich history of public service, practical research, teaching and outreaching for ordinary citizens. The success in this system over decades working hard to meet the communities’ needs in the United States and the world at large did not help to avoid some challenges. The land grant universities are facing many challenges and these challenges will continue within the next five to twenty five years, such as the climate changing and its impact on agricultural productivity, the engagement with the community, and the increase of professors and undergraduate students’ ages in the land grant universities. One of the most important challenges that faced land grant universities is that the global
To be granted 'native title ' they must prove that they have not done anything to break their connection to the land, such as selling or leasing the
This means that the land actually means a lot to them and that is one of the best way to give back to them for what we caused their ancestors to go through. They don't care about the money , " their land is a tradition , not a resource " . Is more than jus a piece of land is their beliefs . Their traditions . Their dignity and respect.
In July of 2003, United States Representative Frank Lucas lobbied for house bill 2912. On December third 2004, President Bush passed that bill which was a remedy to the Osage Allotment Act of 1906. The Osage Allotment Act of 1906 gave Congress the sole authority to determine the Osage Nation’s membership criteria, as well as their unique system of governance. At the time, Congress limited membership to those with, “headrights,” which were shares in the mineral estate. These headrights were often quarterly payments, trust funds, bonuses, and royalties.
This land distribution parallels the Dawes Act of 1887, which privatized land ownership and facilitated the Native Americans into Eurocentric culture. The act justified their land dispossession and reduced the amount of land they were entitles to over time (Sturm, 2014, p.592). Additionally, both acts
Since the housing crash there have been a number of articles and talking heads lamenting homeownership. The opinion is that it's just not a good investment anymore and for some people homeownership is just not in their best interests. Let's look at this from a long term prospective. Owning a home adds pride for the home owner as well as the neighborhood. You can drive down most streets in most any neighborhood and tell which homes are rented and which are owned by the people living there.