ipl-logo

Larry Boatner Case Essay

1436 Words6 Pages

The Case The case involved the shooting of five friends in a house during an armed robbery. One of the witnesses Larry Boatner stated that he was at a friend’s house shortly after Juan Smith and two other people entered the house. They demanded money and drugs which resulted in the shooting that left five of Larry’s friends dead. During the trial Boatner identified Smith as one of the gunmen who entered the house where the shooting took place. Larry Boatner was the only survivor which he then became the sole eye witness to the case. He identified Smith as one of the perpetrators five months after the murder ("Smith V. Cain", 2017). Larry saw the photo of Smith in a local newspaper identifying Smith and linking him to the case as one of the perpetrators.
The court convicted Smith on five counts of first degree murder charges. Following the conviction, he was convicted and received …show more content…

This is in respect to the evidence obtained or evidence given to the defendant or withheld by the prosecution. If the statements affect the decision of the court or the verdict of the jury then Brady violation in this case may affect the due process. It is crucial to Note that the statements are first heard by a court before a ruling on whether the Evidence may affect the case. If the evidence has a probability of changing the verdict then it is said to affect the due process. On the other hand of the disclosed evidence has no probability of affecting the case, then it is not probable to affect the due process. Brady violation affects the due process if the provisions of the new evidence affects the case. In case of inadequate information the jury may state that the information does not amount to Brady Violation. Thus Brady rule violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution ("Smith v. Cain (10-8145)",

Show More
Related

  • What Is The Court Case Of Illinois V. Wardlow

    577 Words  | 3 Pages

    Assignment 2 Illinois v. Wardlow Sam Wardlow was a 44-year-old man who was standing on the side walk in Chicago. When he saw the police cars he decided to flee the scene. Even though Sam was not doing anything suspicious (that the police could see). The police thought that it was suspicious for him to turn back around and run away.

    Read More

  • Marrisa Alexander Case Essay

    905 Words  | 4 Pages

    A crime that recently happened was the Marrisa Alexander case. A mother of 3 sentence to 20 years in prison for firing a warning shot at her abusive husband. Can we use rational choice theory to state that Marrisa Alexander, was a delinquent who committed this crime with all understanding of the law and knowledge of penalty? Physical and verbal abuse can blur the line for a victim that rational thinking may sometimes become and irrational. We will review if Ms. Alexander case, to better understand was this crime committed by a criminal or someone under duress, was rationality used during this incident, and was all preventive measures taken to prevent this crime or was this a case where the law provided no justice for the victim.

    Read More

  • Sarab's Killer Essay

    680 Words  | 3 Pages

    It’s been eight years since Malik received the guilty verdict and was sentenced to life without parole in the California state prison for the rape and murder of his ex-girlfriend Sara Bolson. He spent everyday crying not because he was guilty but because he was about to spend the rest of his life in prison for a crime he did not commit. New victims with the same M.O. as Sara’s killer have been found all over the city of Los Angeles, so the detectives thought that it was possible that the wrong guy was put away and that the killer is now resurfacing or they may have a copycat trying to be like Malik. However, the three bodies found in the past two weeks had the same bruises and strangulation marks around the neck as Sara did and there was evidence showing the same type of drug used to subdue the victim.

    Read More

  • The Case Of People V. Mr2d 504

    440 Words  | 2 Pages

    It was Ricky Franklin Smith fourth offense, in which he was known as a habitual offender. He pleaded guilty to a charge of breaking and entering. During his hearing in the Court of Appeals, Smith suggested that he deserve a resentence due to the fact his charges was base upon his expunged juvenile criminal record. The Court of Appeals referred back to the case in People v. Price, 172 Mich App 396, 399-400; 431 NW2d 524 (1988) that suggested that in pursuant to MCR 5.913 when a juvenile record is expunged it cannot be used in a sentencing. Whereas, People v. Jones 173 Mich App 341, 343;433 NW2d 829 (1988) states that an expunged juvenile record can be included in an investigation report and in a sentencing(People v. Smith, 2017).

    Read More

  • Case Brief Of Hustler Vs Falwell

    3086 Words  | 13 Pages

    Hustler Magazine v. Falwell,485 U.S. 46 (1988) came about as a result of Hustler Magazine and its publisher Larry Flynt publishing a crude ad parody of Baptist minister and televangelist Jerry Falwell. The ad itself was modeled after Campari Liquer ads in which various celebrities talk about their “first times” sampling Campari, clearly playing off the sexual double entendre regarding “first times.” Hustler's November 1983 parody consisted of an alleged interview with Falwell in which he stated that his “first time” was a drunken, incestuous encounter with his mother in an outhouse. Shortly after the parody was printed in Hustler, Falwell sued the magazine and Flynt for intentional infliction of emotional distress. To win a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant intended to cause mental distress or acted with reckless disregard of the probability that such distress would occur.

    Read More

  • Lemon V. Kurtzman Case

    1533 Words  | 7 Pages

    One of the many landmark cases heard by the United States Supreme Court in American history was Lemon vs Kurtzman. In 1971 the Supreme Court had to decide if states could give money to certain religious based schools to hire staff even if the teachers couldn’t teach religious classes. The first amendment to the Constitution established the law of separation of church and state. What is the established boundary between church and state? This case would be the defining point in that fight between the involvement of a state and the churches.

    Read More

  • Roper V. Simmons Essay

    872 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Roper v. Simmons there are two issues that must be addressed, the first being the issue of moral maturity and culpability. The defense in the trial phase of this case argued that Mr. Simmons was an at an age where he was not responsible enough to fully understand the effects and consequences of his actions. The majority draws on Atkins v. Virginia to argue that this specific precedent supports their case that the death penalty should not be imposed on the mentally immature or impaired. However, an important point to be made is that the Atkins v. Virginia decision is geared towards the clinical definition of mental retardation: significant limitations that limit adaptive skills. Also, another important question to consider is the competency and premeditation of Mr. Simmons’ crime in this case.

    Read More

  • Florida Bar Association Essay

    747 Words  | 3 Pages

    Graduates of ABA-accredited universities cannot practice law in the state until passing the Florida Bar examination and becoming licensed. And despite those eligibility requirements remaining incomplete for several years and as previously discussed, the Florida Board of Bar Examiners advises first-year law students complete a student registration early in their first year of law school. The Board, a judicial arm of the Supreme Court of Florida conducts matters of bar admission, offers a special student registration to first-year law students through its Registrant Bar Application at a substantial fee reduction. If postponed, applicants henceforth delay the required background investigation, eventually incur higher registration fees and just might exclude themselves from eligibility for externship programs during their tenure at the college. Delayed long enough and scheduling the bar examination itself also comes into question.

    Read More

  • The Philip Reynolds Case

    446 Words  | 2 Pages

    I am writing to you to request a deviation on behalf of my client Philip Reynolds. The current plea offer is for Mr. Reynolds to plead guilty to DUI Impaired to the slightest degree, and under other terms to serve three days in prison. Based on my client’s background and the circumstances of this case, Philip is respectfully asking that the State amend its current plea offer and allow him to serve only one day in jail. Philip is a single father of three minor children. His wife abandoned the family in 2011.

    Read More

  • Brady V. Maryland Argumentative Essay

    390 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the 1963 ruling in Brady v. Maryland, the United States Supreme Court ruled that any government state or federal has the duty to disclose to a defendant and his counsel any exculpatory information or evidence in its possession. If the

    Read More

  • What Are The Constitutional Amendments In The Movie Fracture

    1559 Words  | 7 Pages

    Fracture is a movie that focuses on the court proceedings of an attempted murder trial and emphasizes the legal aspects of this event. In the film, there are several instances in which the Constitutional Amendments are used in the movie as positive or negative rulings in the court. Because this is a movie follows a complex court case, it is an excellent source for these Constitutional Amendments and provides a multitude of examples to accurately represent the commonly used amendments in trials and arrests. This movie focuses primarily on the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution, as well as the basic concepts of criminal justice.

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Cases Essay

    1705 Words  | 7 Pages

    The Supreme Court has been used for basically the entirety of America’s history. Though many think of recent ones or cases in the past century when thinking about the Supreme Court, the 1800s had many Supreme Court cases that were pivotal to America. Marbury v. Madison was a case in the Supreme Court decided in 1803. When John Adams was in his final days of presidency, he nominated people to serve as justices of peace for D.C., but his secretary did not deliver all of the commissions by the time Thomas Jefferson became president, and William Marbury was one whose commission was not delivered. When Jefferson became president, he ended up disallowing his secretary James Madison from delivering the commissions, but Marbury along with other

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Case Essay

    537 Words  | 3 Pages

    “There comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but he must take it because conscience tells him it is right. ”(Martin Luther King, Jr.) Most people were racist but now since the civil rights have been established most have stopped being racist and moved on. Three supreme court case decisions influenced the civil rights movements by letting more and more poeple know what the Supreme Court was doing to African Americans,and of the unfair him crow laws:(Dred Scott v. Sanford,Plessy v. Ferguson,Brown v. Board of Education). Dred Scott v. Sanford Is a case that most people felt that Dred Scott had an unfair charge against him.

    Read More

  • Apprendi Vs New Jersey Case Study

    860 Words  | 4 Pages

    Apprendi vs. New Jersey Apprendi vs. New Jersey landmarked United States Supreme Court decisions dealing with provoking factors in crimes. Furthermore, it was found that judges were prohibited to sentence beyond the maximum amount because of factors other than the ones found by the jury. Beyond a reasonable doubt was the key word in this case. This case decision has been the precedent for the rights of people in jury trials. This case set the tone for other trials where an increased prison term was questionable.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Due Process

    245 Words  | 1 Pages

    The due process deals with the administration of justice and thus the due process clause acts as a safeguard from arbitrary of life, liberty or property by the government outside the sanction of law. One of the pros of the Due process is that accused gets to enjoy all Constitutional protections of law and the entire process is fair and well balanced. However the con is that it takes the time, hardship on the victims and their families in having to be at every hearing.

    Read More

More about Larry Boatner Case Essay

Open Document