Laura and Howie’s excursion was an immature action for which they should have been punished. Howies and Laura’s excursion was an immature action because they could have solved the situation easily by going back to the camp and act as if nothing would have happened. Although, I would have also felt mad if some boys would have stripped and marooned me as they did to Howie , Howie and Laura would have just gotten revenge to them and act chill. All the things Laura and Howie did lead to a series of unreasonable events that could have had a better solution and could have ended peacefully. One better decision could have changed the entire situations and events that occurred. Another reason why Laura and Howie should have been punished is because …show more content…
In my opinion, they should have stayed in the camp. Howie and Laura would have had a great chance of snitching on what the campers did to them. If they would have done that, the campers would have gotten in more trouble they were already in for stripping and marooning them in an island. You have to let the adults take care of something that serious. Howie and Laura decided to fix the problem themselves but ended up solving nothing, instead they made things worse. Obviously, the campers would have gotten into trouble because the camp supervisors don’t allow this. Police officers have a really important job to do. They take cases that are really dangerous. Laura and Howie didn’t ever get hurt throughout their “adventure”. I am saying this because it shows how useless their investigation was . It was just a case of two kids running away. At the end, Howie and Laura were going to go back to see their family eventually. The police department made a big case because out of this. I am not saying it was dumb, but what I am trying to say is that the police department could have only sent a couple police officers to the scene. This was a pressured conflict. Maddie did good by telling the police about this. The police didn’t send any duty officers that were supposed to fix everything. The conflict stayed the same thing with and without the
Laura Ingalls Wilder Laura Ingalls Wilder was a children 's book author. She is the author of the famous Little House on the Prairie series. She had a very interesting life and career. She also had a very fun filled life.
“On July 30, 1992, an innocent person was convicted of a heinous crime”. Guy Paul Morin, an ordinary man, was arrested, imprisoned and convicted of first degree murder. The victim was Christine Jessop, a nine-year-old girl from Ontario, Canada. She was found murdered in a field about fifty kilometres from where she lived. Due to the investigation team’s carelessness and tunnel vision, the systematic failure of the justice system, and the poor handling of evidence by the crown there was not only one, but two victims in this case.
Although, the picture the public failed to see at first ultimately led to a harsh and difficult lifestyle for these kids. Both judges were very demanding, for example in cash for kids, judge Ciavarella didn’t put up with any kid. Whether it was a small behavioral offense or a larger criminal offense, he treated it the same. Ciavarella
Not calling 911 and hiding the body was morally and criminally wrong. The lack of remorse bothered me as an utter disregard for her dead daughter and selfishness unparalleled. I believe that the prosecution’s putting the death
Investigators tried their best to figure out why the family was
In The Lord of The Flies, Sam and Eric deal with conflict by sticking together. There are many conflicts in the book, but the twins always stick together through their actions, speech, effects on others, and stage of moral development. So when is this represented in the book? The author, William Golding, shows how Samneric deal with conflict in The Lord of The Flies when the twins let the fire go out, they join the hunters, and when they help Ralph confront Jack’s tribe. Sam and Eric’s actions show how they deal with conflict by sticking together through their actions.
When the boys get stranded on this island they must take care of themselves and try to get rescued. As the boys climb this mountain to get home they face new challenges which resulted them to descend into savagery. With these new challenges of killing the pig for the first time, them breaking the conch, and deaths of Simon and Piggy they to descend into savagery causing them to lose their innocence. After the boys crash landed on the island it was only a matter of time before the boys descend into savagery because lack of leadership, need for survival and loss of innocence. Their first goal on the island was to have fun and get rescued but throughout their stay, they get further away from that.
One of the members decided to beat up Peter, Cole did not take this lightly and punches him in return. Unluckily a teacher sees Cole and sends them all to the principal’s office. Cole tries to explain what happened but his effort falls upon deaf ears. This is not the only encounter with the bullies that the two have. This time the gang tries to beat them up but this time they have a new strategy.
The school boys main focus was to survive and get rescued. While Piggy and Ralph were looking for the other boys that also fell onto the island they saw a conch. Then Piggy had suggested to Ralph that he should blow into the conch to help them call for the other boys. They selected someone to
The discretion of the case was significant in the regard of the defense, which countered some contradicted evidences. The evidences from the trial and the hearing preliminaries have revealed that the children were coached. The testimony showed lack of credibility on the issues and showing the significance of the discretion on the defense. McMartin told his attorney that he did not do it and his attorney used his discretion and believed him.
In the article " Boy, 13, charged 'wrestling ' death of girl,5" by Kennedy ryan, he states that the 13 year old boy killed his half-sister. The boy should know whats good and bad but in this case it wasnt his fauly. Because he thought he was just playing with the 5 year old girl. The victimed moms just left the boy to babysit his half-sister but instead she should of took them with her to the store, if thats where she was going. The boy didnt want to kill the girl but to him it was a wrestling game but he didnt know that by playing like that he was gonna killed the 5 year old girl(Half-sister).
If I was in Taylor’s position I would defiantly report the real story. I would report that officer Ansley used excessive force on the individual. The individual was put in the hospital with multiple fractures to his skull, by the hands of a “Supposedly” well trained officer. What if it was my child, mother, or someone I personally knew. I would have told Lt.
The caregivers lacked commitment, compassion, conscientiousness, fairness and honesty, and if they had taken their jobs seriously probably Tomcik wouldn’t have suffered as much. Trial began on July 22, 1991 and the decision was made on October 7, 1991. Tomcik’s total damage came out to be $85,000 according to the text. The defendants were proven wrong and they were charged. The court did the right thing, but I think a stricter action should have been taken against the defendants.
if it was held at school of course they would be expelled. After listening to the case i believe that the court made a good
Is it fair that all of Robbie’s hopes and dreams were confiscated because of a 13 year old girl accusing him of a crime that was never proven to be true? In the book Atonement by Ian McEwan Briony is an adolescent in the beginning and does not understand the changes of adulthood. When her cousin Lola comes to her and confesses she has been raped she assumes it was Robbie because of a sexual contented letter she finds that he wrote to her sister. As a result his life changes drastically and every goal he has in life is wiped away. We later come to find he was not the one who committed the crime.