After reading the article, “Leadership Group on School Staffing Challenges,” I began to think how these licensing recommendation would affect me as a future educator. For example, Licensing Strategy #4 deals with the review and reconsideration of testing requirements for licensure currently. To summarize, this licensing strategy advises if the teaching candidate’s grade point average is between 3.0/4.0, the candidate will be exempted from taking the Praxis II exam. Furthermore, the candidate’s grade point average validates their mastery or efficiency. As a future educator, this Leadership Group recommendation to excuse certain teacher candidates because of their dedication and competence in their schooling is beneficial to me. I had a grade point average above 3.0, which pardons me from taking the Praxis II exam. Moreover, not being required to take the exam will save me money, which can be further used when I have to take the Foundations of Reading Test (FoRT). To continue, an interesting statement mentioned about the cost of assessments caught my attention when reading the article. To become a future educator, I will have to pay $1,200 or more just to enter my profession. …show more content…
I agree with guiding principles of the Leadership Group, but I believe the cost is overbearing. Along with that, I believe the most beneficial and insightful assessment would be from a veteran educator, who has been in the field for numerous years and has lots of experience. In the article, it mentions the “potential bias in assessments,” which suggests the educators of the courses are biased towards wanting the candidate succeed. My outlook on this is that the educators of the candidate understand and know the candidate the best. Furthermore, the educators would know if the candidate would fail or succeed due to attitude and strive the candidate brought to the classroom along with knowing the candidate for multiple
From studying education, I have noticed how many school districts teach based upon what the students will be tested over. As a future educator, I feel as if a standardized test cannot determine what a student is capable of. The individuals creating the test often don’t realize that many students suffer from test anxiety, in fear of failing the test and what is more fearful is how the school districts pressure the teachers to stress to the students the importance of passing the test. Also, in this chapter Boaler describes assessment for learning as having three components clear communication about what students have learned, a way to help students understand where they are on their journey to mastery and where they still need to improve, and information on ways to get from where students are currently to where they need to be to meet success criteria. This chapter offered several strategies that will help students have a better grasp of where they are in the learning process and that will help them develop and maintain a growth mindset.
After reading the interviews on Len Bickman and now David Fetterman, it seems being an evaluator is dangerous work. It is frustrating to read the obstacles educators have to navigate to see progress made in discovering new ways to teach and learn. We are trying to educate in a fast paced world where information changes so quickly, so how will schools ever be free to move with the ever changing landscape when the political dynamic creates obstacles of progress. Luckily we get to read about educators who are not afraid to step in front of the train and evaluate with integrity and demand we do what is right for our students. Fetterman explains how easy it is to be retrospectively courageous, but the hardest thing is to do the right thing at
Sawchuk discusses the massive task of getting all the public school K-12 teachers ready for the standards. Professional development and the roles of the states and school districts are reviewed. This article is clearly demonstrates the amount of work it will involve to make the Common Core Standards a reality across the United States. Wilhoit, G. (2012). Make-or-break state action.
Chapter 3: Case Study Discussion #5. If you were the superintendent, what factors would you consider before responding to Mr. Inglis? As superintendent, there are several factors I would consider before responding to Mr. Inglis. First, I would want to thoroughly examine all of the elements related to this matter.
Classroom assessment and grading practices have the potential not only to measure and report learning but also to promote it. Indeed, recent research has documented the benefits of regular use of diagnostic and formative assessments as feedback for learning (Black, Harrison, Lee, Marshall, & Wiliam,
Discussion Post- Chapter 7- High stakes testing Claim: High stakes testing is an extremely problematic political issue within the education system because it holds all students to the same standards regardless of disabilities or disadvantages , it encourages educators to teach strictly on information that relates to the tests, and it can have major consequences for schools across the country that are unable to make Adequete Yearly Progress (AYP). Evidence: The Learning to Teach Edition Nine textbook outlines key disadvantages to high stakes testing. Although the textbook does consider some of the advantages, which include a focus of attention on the achievement of students and providing information on areas where students may need to improve,
Those consequences are higher school dropout rates, educator/schools cheating on test to keep or increase their funding, and teachers leaving the profession because of the consequences associated with the testing policy (p.
What assessment tools will I need? What are the differentiated class sections that are aligned with the objectives? How do I engage and promote the maximum effectiveness in the learning environment? Secondly, the Payment teacher data artifact helps to understand the intention of the students who remain in the course.
There are also much better ways to test a student’s capability to learn; a 2006 Center on Education Policy conducted a study and found that a curriculum that follows state standards and uses the test data as feedback led to higher scores than those that prioritized test-taking skills. When teachers are more focused on teaching material rather than test strategies, their students benefit from it (“Do Standardized Tests Show an Accurate View of Students’ Abilities?”). Several alternative methods to state assessments for measuring a student’s academic success include comparing high school graduation rates and the number of dropouts, offering advanced placement courses, and looking at the percentage of the former students that are admitted to colleges. State assessments are more harmful than helpful to students; they are a large cause of test anxiety and a majority of teachers can never fully prepare their students. Although state assessments are an easy way to be able to see the growth of students, that does not mean that they are the best
Upon compiling and analyzing employee data including, demographics, salaries, education, and years of service several trends have been identified. These trends can be used by the company both to improve in areas that they are struggling and to show areas that they are excelling in. The most apparent trend found was the lack of diversity in terms of gender, level of education, and race. Based on the data it is clear that the majority of the employees are white, males, with a high school education. Being that the company strives for diversity, in the future they should move towards hiring more females and more minorities (in terms of race).
Tests should be low-stakes, flexible questions and evaluations should ask for thoughtful responses and not multiple-choice guesses, and a reinforcement of the fact that tests are not the “be all, end all” when it comes to the goal of the education system. By doing this, we would give
Assessments are a teacher’s tool that builds a profile on student’s growth and are the “tell-tell” detectors that provide the with teacher information on a student who may need additional services in and beyond the
2:1 Compare the strengths and limitations of assessments of a range of assessment methods with reference to the needs of individual learners. Workplace Observations, question and answer/professional discussions, projects/assignments, portfolios, witness statements. A good assessor will always take into account their learners needs and what particular subject they are studying for prior to confirming with learner type of assessment method to be used. Workplace observations
Smarter Balanced Assessment: Pro or Con? Smarter Balanced Assessment, who is it truly assessing, the teachers or the students? Smarter Balanced testing contributes to the teacher’s performance, but is it beneficial or does it have unintended consequences? Students are ultimately grading the teachers by taking these tests and they are not even aware of it. The disadvantages may outweigh the benefits for this topic, but teachers must look past the disadvantages and do what they were meant to do, teach.
I incorporate this learned experience daily and learn through each success and discovered area of improvement. Addressing my students needs using a variety of assessment tools has been a beneficial practice to help guide instruction. Students have different learning styles and their strengths and weaknesses are not always apparent using the same methods of assessment. Utilizing formative, standards(goal)-based, anecdotal, observational and benchmarks has driven my instructional programs. The combination of different assessments provides me with a multi-dynamic perspective of my students allowing me to better understand their strengths, weakness and academic needs.