Leadership is an important aspect in our life. It is all started within a basic unit of family which the father held the responsibilities as a leader that lead family towards happiness. Leadership skills also been practiced at the primary school level where there are class monitor or class president who is in charge of the class. The major aspect is for government where a leader is elected or appointed in order to rule the country. Leadership style is classified as the way leaders perform their role and how their action and attitude toward members of the group (Mullin, 1999). In scope of Human Resource, leadership is one of the most important factor in any organizations. Successful organization depends on how leaders lead and managing the organization. …show more content…
This skill describe as the act of the leader in letting the workers or employee to make decisions and complete their work according to the way they think that fits them. This type of leadership minimizes the leader involvement in decision makings. According to Robbins and Coulter (2014) laisser-faire style is a leader who lets the group make decisions and complete the work in whatever way it sees fit. There are a few characteristics of laissez-faire style. Cherry (2016) mentioned that there are four characteristics of laissez-faire leadership style. The first characteristics is the employee will get only little guidance from the leader. The second characteristics is the employee has freedom to make decisions without hesitation to apply what they feel right. This is because the employees know many things on how to perform the work better than the employer. The leaders provide and prepare for the resources and the equipment needed in order to fulfill the employee needs. Although the employee makes the decision but the leader still follow the progress and give guideline to their employee. Gill (2014) stated that laissez-faire leadership style is mostly used in creative businesses or in product development. Laissez-faire leadership style is developed by Kurt Lewin. Example of laissez-faire leadership style is transcontinental railroad. There is no single individual responsible for building the North American railway system. This …show more content…
Based on Christina Boateng’s study (as cited in Bass & Avolio, 1994) transformational leadership is a progression that transforms the organization by changing followers to leaders and leaders to agents of change. A change is constant when practicing this type of leadership as the leader is looking forward and guides the followers to keep improving themselves in order to make out the best performance for the employees and organization. A leader is more advanced in doing things than others in the organization. There are a few characteristics of transformational leadership. Firstly, the transformational leader has an idealized influence. A leader’s charismatic that involved the followers’ respect and trust which leads to the followers’ loyalty. The second characteristic is as an inspirational motivation. A transformational leader always inspires others in creating new ideas and finding the best ways in achieving goals which have been designed from the start. The followers will believe in their abilities and optimist about the future as the leaders have encouraged them. One of the visionary aspects of leadership that can drive followers toward their goals is communication skills that can make the vision intelligible, powerful and engaging. Thirdly, individualized consideration is one of the most important characteristics that a transformational leader
(Kerfoot 1998) (Evans, 2003). The Personality traits for good leader are activity level or energy, adjustment, dominance, assertiveness, emotional balance and emotional control, self- confidence, originality, intelligence, tolerance of stress, personal integrity, independence, achievement motivation, sociability, responsibility, initiative, and diplomacy (NYSTEDT 1997). Furthermore, Agreeableness and conscientiousness is perceived as a trait for transformational leaders (ARTOG2 et al 2005).
Abstract The aim of this paper is to study how to mitigate and avoid the perils of hubristic leadership in an organization by using risk management concept. The objective of this study is to identify the main factors that influence the hubris leadership and how the perils of hubris leadership might be mitigate and avoid by using risk management concept. Finally, the main factors that influence the hubris leadership is such like excessive self-confidence, self-importance, egotism, an incentive and abrasive, aloofness or arrogance, betrayal of personal trust and overdependence on a mentor and risk control has been used to minimizing the risk of the loss in hubris leadership by using techniques of risk avoidance and risk reduction. The concepts advanced, and implications discussed, provide an insight into the role of leader in reducing hubris and this paper suggest that future research should attempt to examine other factors that may influence the hubris leadership.
Laissez-Faire leadership, otherwise called delegative leadership, is a sort of leadership style in which leaders are hands-off and permit bunch individuals to settle on the choices. Scientists have found that this is by and large the leadership style that prompts the most reduced profitability among gathering individuals. Managers and administrators who receive the Laissez-Faire leadership style delegate obligation regarding the achievement of work targets and choice making energy to their representatives. On the inverse end of the range is the Laissez-Faire leadership style, which is to a greater extent a hands-off methodology. A Laissez-Faire leader gives others the correct instruments and assets required, and after that backs off, giving
Leadership is an essential task in management (Weihrich, et al., 2008), as it is an important factor that contributes enormously to the over-all wellbeing of the organisations (Odumeru & Ifeanyi, 2013). As stated by Cox (2001), transactional and transformational are two important types of leadership. The differentiation amongst these two types of leadership was initially made by Downton (1973), as cited in (Barnett, et al., 2001), and introduced by Burns (1978) in his descriptive work on political leaders. Transformational Leaders Transformational leadership is also defined as the way of influencing the employees by “broadening and elevating followers’ goals and providing them with confidence to perform beyond the expectations specified in
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP Transformational Leadership is defined as leadership style focused on effecting revolutionary change in organizations through a commitment to the organization’s vision. (Sullivan & Decker, 2001) Transformational leaders are usually given higher position and are known for their charismatic sense and ability to develop high visions and regards in the work they do. They often give their best performances due to the low morale or self esteem Example: Steve Job, Bill Gates and Ratan Tata. As the existentialist rightly said, we always have a choice, in doing what we already have done or doing that which we have never done.
Bass & Riggio (2005, pp. 4-8) explains that transformational leaders inspire their followers to exceed their own expectations and perceived capabilities and is comprised of the four components of idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individualised consideration. DuBrin (2016, p.163) suggest that leaders in a time of crisis need to
He further illustrates that transformational leadership instills trust, admiration, loyalty, and respect in members for their leader, thus they are motivated to do more than they originally expected to do. Similarly, according to Bass (1991), the leader transforms and motivates followers by making them more aware of the importance of results, encouraging them to rise above their own self-interest for the good of the organization, while stimulating their higher-order
They are enthusiastic individuals are usually seen as active, expressive and energetic. They are often optimistic and open to change with a quick and alert mind set. Transformational leaders in today’s society are better for the organization because in maintaining a business for the long term, leaders need to focus on the overall growth of originality and
219). Additionally, the morals and ethics from ones leadership style is transformed to their followers, and leadership associated with his or her power should raise employee’s consciousness on what values and goals are important to the individual (Ciulla, 2003). Transformational leadership will occur by providing a mindset for followers to make a conscious choice among real alternatives in making moral decisions (Ciulla,
I prefer to use the Laissez Faire Leadership Style for it engages the people around you and stimulates more ideas in your mind as there is a diversity of perspectives and it is based passing the leadership process to the worker. The Laissez Faire style allows all of the team members to be engaged in the choices and decisions, which eliminates any feeling of uselessness since the members can pull in their thoughts just like the higher heads in the hierarchy. My choice of the Laissez Faire Leadership Style depends on several success stories of organizations that used it; one of these organizations is SAMSUNG's use of the leadership style to achieve its business plans. In Song, and Lee (2015) Samsung's success story is described in details according to its plans. To supply the demand of the market, youths are the best batch of people to target since they are the group which is keen to involve technology in their lives.
Transformational leadership has 4 factors, sometimes referred to as the 4 I 's: Idealized Influence (II), Inspirational Motivation (IM), Individualized Consideration (IC), and Intellectual Stimulation (IS). In taking a closer look at each of these factors, I will be able to figure out how to use them effectively in my future leadership role will benefit me greatly in my quest of becoming an effective leader. The first transformational factor is idealized influence (II). The leader serves as an ideal role model for followers; the leader "walks the walk," and is admired for this.
Laissez Faire Leaders are ones who choose not to intervene and will allow the group to make decisions independently. This style can happen automatically and will result in a loss of group direction if the leader is inadequate. Lewin (1985) found that when subjected to this style of leadership, group members were inclined to be aggressive towards each other and gave up easily when mistakes occur. In this style of leadership, the characteristics adopted by the leader depends fundamentally on how favourable the situation
Leadership: Definition Leadership is the process of influencing the motive of the employees and so directing, guiding them to the proper completion of the short-term goals and the mission, vision of the firm. Leadership referring to achieve a specific set of goals of the business enterprise by minimizing risk and more advantage of opportunities is also called Entrepreneurial Leadership (Rao, 2015). Today leadership is such an iterative process when the leaders should have a variety of qualities and expertise in different area of management. Here, different theories will be explained which can clearly identify the scope, the responsibilities and the area of expertise required to be successful leader.
Experienced and trained employees that require little or no supervision falls under the laissez-faire leadership style. This leadership style affects a group success in that if the group is doing something wrong there is no feedback from management to make corrections since management do not directly supervise them and would led mistakes being made continuously. ● Autocratic- This leadership style managers makes all decisions with the input of others.
Leadership is a very important term in power, politics and in organization. It can be defined as Leadership is both a research area and a practical skill encompassing the ability of an individual or organization to lead or guide other individuals, teams, or entire organizations. The literature debates various viewpoints: contrasting Eastern and Western approaches to leadership and also (within the West) US vs. European approaches. US academic environments define leadership as "a process of social influence in which a person can enlist the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of a common task" [8]. Organization Leadership is termed as the leadership in an organization.