So how, are naturally people inclined to look for a leader? The value of a good leader is the leader working by side with their people. Being able to encourage their people to become a leader like their leader. The qualities of being a leader are honesty showing respect to others and having a goal to accomplish and to never get up. The value of being a bad leader is a leader who lacks vision that cannot support their own team.
Although traits can be learned and developed, I believe they play a major role and whether someone will be comfortable leading others or whether they have the capability to lead others. As previously stated, Oprah has so many traits that have made her a successful well-balanced leader. There isn’t one correct style for all leaders in all circumstances at all times and any group or individual behaves differently from each other. Each leader has to figure out their differences and adapt according to each of their own situations. In the end, they use the same ideas in different ways the suit them that brings them the success of being a leader.
Leaders are not followed as a mere result of the authority conferred onto him or her by the organization, in actual fact, a leader is followed as he/she will show great passion and personal investment in the success of their followers. Leaders assist other individuals in achieving their goals, in spite of these possibly being different to that of the organization’s
A leader is someone who is in charge that can help us create a great lifestyle.A functioning society must have someone who is able to worry about everyone while protecting them from dangerous activity. I am Legend is a great representation of what a leader must be. In this film, Will Smith is portrayed as to be a great hero after undergoing a horrific fight against society. Because Will Smith is a leader, leaders must choose to make the right
Servant leaders are tremendously different from the leader first. For example the servant first tries, to the best of their ability to make sure other people 's priorities and needs are being served. A servant leaders primarily focus is on the growth and wellbeing of people and the communities that they belong to. It is known that traditional leadership generally involves the growth and exercise of power by having only one person at the “top of the pyramid”, contrary to servant leadership. Servant leaders are extremely important because of the fact that they can relate to the people.
While this may not be the most appealing leadership strategy in terms of building relationships and developing a highly motivating work environment, it often works, and leaders in most organizations use it on a daily basis to get things done. Charismatic leadership theory The Charismatic Leader gathers followers through dint of personality and charm, rather than any form of external power or authority. It is interesting to watch a Charismatic Leader 'working the room ' as they move from person to person. Situational leadership theories Autocratic - this leadership style is one where the manager sets objectives, allocates tasks, and insists on obedience. Therefore the group becomes dependent on him or her.
An effective leader will try to make his goal the same as his workers or use a persuasive communication strategy in order to convice the workers to do what the leaders want as a goal. Throughout the last centuries many leaders have ruled countries and some writers have divided the leaders into good and bad or effective and non-effective. An effective leader is a person that has a lot of passion in what he/she does,they have ambition and also a vision of a better place to live with a better society. On the other hand a non-effective leader even,if charismastic,if he/she uses the power to a personal benefit is a manipulator. A leader who manipulated an entire country is for example Adolf Hitler when he came in power with his party.
Conceptually, post-bureaucratic leadership surrounds ‘unobtrusive peer based teamwork control’, and blurs the segments of the hierarchy between the influencing agent- the manager- and the persons influenced- the employees. This is not to say that post-bureaucratic leadership is any less authoritive, but rather replaces distinction of the hierarchy with even-leveled democratic networks. Through a democratic leadership style, when a goal has been identified a leader encourages members of a team to input the most efficient and effective ways of achieving this, and then supports them in completing the goal or
The term "transactional" refers to the fact that this type of leader essentially motivates subordinates by exchanging rewards for performance. A transactional leader generally does not look ahead in strategically guiding an organization to a position of market leadership; instead, these managers are solely concerned with making sure everything flows smoothly today. Advantages As stated above both leadership styles are needed for guiding an organization to success, and it was thanks to that approach that Fight Club was such a successful organization. Transactional leaders provide distinct advantages through their abilities to address small operational details quickly. Transactional leaders handle all the details that come together to build a strong reputation in the marketplace, while keeping employees productive on the front
Ambition & political acumen should go hand in hand because one cannot survive without the other. Someone has ambition but if he doesn’t have political acumen to clear his path to achieve his ambition then his path is not a cake walk, he might have to abandon in the whole thing. A leader with good political acumen can plan his path, can overtake his retaliators, and can outperform all others to achieve his goal. MOBILITY Mobilizing people has always been the hardest challenge for any leader, leader should understand why someone will follow someone else’s path! It can be for money, power, association, culture etc.