Duality of Leadership and its Consequences
Good leadership comes from the desire to better the community but leadership can turn disastrous when power is craved for the benefit of oneself. Willam Golding illustrates this theme in Lord of the Flies using Jack Merridew and Ralph. Both boys are in positions of leadership but different types. While Jack focuses on enjoyment, lives in the present and selfishly gains power, Ralph wants to escape the island and prioritizes the future of the group. His caring nature represents Ralph being a good leader and stepping up to the job. Jack’s leadership causes turmoil and chaos on the island and all of the blame can be put on Jack instead of Ralph because Ralph was just trying to survive and plays no
…show more content…
When Jack invites Ralph to go to his feast and all of Jack’s group is having fun, Ralph laughs and says “Without the fire we can’t be rescued. I’d like to put on war-paint and be savage. But we must keep the fire burning.” (Golding 142). Ralph acknowledges that he wants to be with Jack’s group and have fun, however the responsibility of the survival that the group put on him when he was appointed as the chief weighs more heavily on him than his personal need to have fun. Ralph’s traits of responsibility, maturity and effectiveness are extremely visible during this scene because he is taking all the …show more content…
The deaths and destruction that happened, only happened because of Jack’s decline into savagery and when he sees that most of the group is taking his side, he grows even more power hungry ultimately causing the downfall of the island. When Ralph is trying to explain to Jack that they go back to the shelters because it was about to rain, Jack had already begun chanting “kill the beast, cut his throat, spill his blood” (Golding 152). Jack starting this chant was a way to gain more power over the boys in the tribe by enabling a vicious part of them that was shown through when they killed the pig and because Jack has such a strong need for power he is willing to do whatever means necessary for him to stay in power even if that means unifying all the boys together to create a mob that only thinks of violence. Since all the boys are in a violent mob-like trance when they see Simon the group do not register that he is not a beast but a human and ultimately killing Simon while chanting. The death of Simon was caused by the chant that made the group feel a sense of security and protection being with Jack which made them unafraid of anything and as soon as they murdered Simon their last shred of civilization was gone and savagery took over. Jack’s selfishness, desire for power and savagery were the starting of chaos on the island and since the group was in
Jack, another main character, tries to fight for that same leadership role but ends up using the superstition of an unknown beast to dissolve the island into mayhem. Therefore, Jack Merridew should be blamed for the chaos and eventual destruction
In the novel Lord of the Flies, there are various types of leaderships evident. Ralph and Jack are two of the main characters in the book, who both show a great sense of leadership on the island and towards the boys. Ralph being a democratic leadership, and Jack being a dictatorial leadership. First the fact that Ralph was a democratic leader will be discussed and proven with evidence.
Imagine being stranded on an island with nothing but little boys and pigs and no real sense of leadership and responsibility. That’s exactly what Lord of the Flies is. The hunger for power over other beings is a great way to destroy civilization and order as seen in Lord of the Flies. The struggle for being chief has torn two of the oldest and strongest characters apart. Their appearance, personality, and beliefs put them on opposite ends of the spectrum adding to the chaos enriched feud between Jack and Ralph.
Throughout the novel, Jack consistently demonstrates a disregard for rules and a desire for dominance and power. When he leads the boys in hunting and violence, he taps into their savage and primal instincts - including Ralph’s. As Jack proclaims, "The conch doesn't count at this end of the island" (Golding, 150) it becomes evident that he prioritizes dominance and power over order, authority, and the established rules on the island. In the midst of their destructive rivalry, Jack’s failures teach Ralph important lessons. Witnessing Jack’s inability to maintain the signal fire makes Ralph recognize the value of collaboration, communication, and planning for survival.
Ralph's style of leadership and leading is based on logic and reason, while Jack shows leadership by using fear and intimidation. By them Jack and Ralph having different ways they show their leadership this will lead to conflict. In the literary work Lord of the flies by William Golding, the reader is introduced to the character's personality and beliefs. According to the author, Ralph felt himself the center of an uncomfortable attention.
An examination of this quote reveals how Ralph Cares for every boy living with him. The author also expresses how instead of helping with the camp and fire Jack made others do that, while he went off hunting for a pig just to prove his own self-worth. In closing, it is important to note that Jack is a more selfish leader, but Ralph believes in what is best for all the
Jack just wanted to have fun on the island. There were no parents or adults there to stop him. He was more focused on being selfish and making sure he survived. Jack didn’t care about the other boys, they were just there to help him. Jack used the boys so he would be able to survive.
The novel Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding takes readers through a story that consists of numerous conflicts. Although there are many instances of conflicts that arise between the characters and other factors, such as technology and nature, one of the major conflicts within this novel is the dispute between Ralph and Jack. This conflict regards who is the better leader for the boys during their time on the island. Throughout the novel, the obvious and most effective leader is Ralph. Ralph is the better leader for the boys during their time on the island because Ralph obtains strong leadership abilities, he can maintain civility, along with order on the island, and he is empathetic towards the boys.
People are always relying on leaders to help them along, but maybe it’s safer to go on alone. After surviving the crash, the boys rely on each other for their everyday tasks. They go as far as selecting one boy to make all the decisions for the group. As time goes on, they find separate ways of learning what really makes a great leader. In the book, Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, the authority and fear produced by Jack and Ralph influence the unity within the group.
(Golding, Pg. 71) This quote proves that Jack cares more about himself than the rest of the people in the group because he took everyone to help him hunt, and didn’t complete little things that needed to be done. This is why Jack is the worst leader. But there were two other leadership styles on the island, and one of those is
Lord of the Flies by William Gilding is a novel that portrays the essential problem of leadership and its limitations. Throughout the novel, it becomes clear that no leader can satisfy everybody’s needs. This is demonstrated through the experience of Ralph, Jack, Simon, and other characters who struggle to find their place within the group Ralph is selected as the leader by the boys at the beginning of the story. Ralph tries to establish order and build a community. But he faces constant challenges from the other boys who do not share his same ideas.
This shows that Ralph isn't the only one who wants order on the island, but needs rules to keep civilization. But as we go on we see that Jack starts to think that Ralph's rules are wrong and that everyone is not obeying the rules, and he wants to start his own leadership. Jack states,” I’m not going to play any longer, not with you, I'm not going to be a part of ralphs lot-”(127). We see that Jack had enough of Rlaphs “poor leadership” and wants to start his own civilization and shows a lack of civility towards Ralphs's leadership
His direct involvement in Simon’s death and how he planned for Piggy’s and pre-meditated Ralph’s death. His savage rule and his blood-lust brought inhumane deaths, punishments, and behavior among the boys. His deisire for leadership and his fantasies of the perfect tribe nearly desroyed everyone on the island and burnt down half the island in the process, and why Jack is guilty of 1st degree
After Jack and his choir agree to tend to the signal fire, Ralph spots a potential rescue ship but finds that Jack’s group let the fire go out as they went on a pig hunt, making Ralph extremely enraged and disappointed. Whereas previously there were only minor arguments that resolved quickly and easily that did not damage their relationship much, this marks the official beginning of the conflict of Ralph against Jack. After this incident was yet another turning point. What started off as an assembly “to put things straight” resulted in Jack disputing Ralph’s authority and leading everyone away in a show of clear mutiny. This shows that Jack is distancing himself and the group away from Jack.
Jack lost his sanity and civility and this changed him in more ways than imaginable. Jack was a natural leader when the boys first came onto the island, but as time continued he became a horrible dictator. On the first day on the island, Ralph and Jack competed for chief of the island. Ralph won. Jack was unhappy with this result, but it didn’t yet throw him into a spiral of craze and anger.